Finally got parts to build a normal file server


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. Well I finally got the money together to say good to my PII 350mhz file server computer. I just picked up 512MB RAM, and a sempron 2400 proc. I had a friend give me a sockaet A mobo. I also picked up the Cooler Master CM Stacker case to give me expandibility in the future when I buy more drives...

So.. now that I have the juice to run windows without the computer freezing up every 10 minutes, I want to load 2003 Server edition. I think that is the best one for a server right? (don't know linux).

The thing is that I am so confused with all these different 2003 server editions. There's enterprise, corporate, SBS. Which one do you guys think that I should use. I have no idea in the differences among them.

Just to give u an overview of my setup. I have 2 desktops 1 laptop and a HTPC that will always be connected to the network. I need the server to always be running to store all my movies so that I can access any time on the HTPC. I also need to be able to share partions and map them as network drives... In addition I want to have some folders to only be available to my computer so tha tno other computer on the network can see it. In addition I would like to be able to log in to the server and make changes any time as I please form a remote PC. ( I am doing that right now with ultraVNC but as I understand 2003 Server edition is specifically made for this purpose). I am really excited about the new server and I am completly new to all this. I look to finally set up my home network the right way once. Like a small business would. Please make comments, suggesitons, and please help me out with this. I appreciate everone's contribution and time. Also I believe Verizon FIOS is coming soon to my area so my crappy DSL conneciton will go, and its upload time! Thanks everyone again and sorry about the long thread.

*EDIT* Sorry guys but one more thing I need ot be able to do. I think 2003 server does this at least one of the version sright? I need for the server to automatically download the latest virus definitions from norton and all the updates and automatically update all the computers on the network (Ill make sure that they are all using the same version of norton). Also if possible to do the same with windows updates. The thing is the updates on 2003 server are probably not oging to be the same as for XP Pro which all of the computers are running right now. Thanks again guys. Hopefully I can get some help on tihs.

Microsoft do 5 versions of Server 2003:

Web, Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter and Small Business Server.

Standard Version should be fine for what you want to do.

As for the "I need for the server to automatically download the latest virus definitions from norton" you need a piece of "Norton" software to do that, but the usual "Norton 200x" software wont work on a server so you need something like Symantec Anti Virus Server 8 or 9.

Remove Management

Server 2003 allows you to control it via Remote Desktop.

ChocIST

All right thanks. Just some more quesitons. Some1 reccomnded that I use 2000 Server because its more stable and less bloated. What do you guys think about this idea? Also what are the benefits of using a domain with my setup? In addition will I be able to access the server from within anywhere through the internet?

Id use Server 2003 personally but I havent had much use with Server 2000.

Using a domain on your setup, things are controlled centerally instead of being individual workstations, alot easier if you set things up correctly the first time.

Depends on what you mean by "access".....I can Remote Desktop into my server at home from anywhere on the web aswell as access the webserver/mail server part. Really depends on what you want to do and what hardware you already have.

ChocIST

Rather use W2K Pro or XP Pro (if you have a spare license) or use nix. That is a lot of money to spend on an OS for just a file server.

585920012[/snapback]

agreed - if you are to do this legally/cheaply then best way is to use something like Linux - assuming you are setting this up purely for fileshare etc then you can do everything you could possibly want through tools in KDE etc. Something like SuSE has the automatic update function so you need not worry about patching it manually!

Plus once its configured you need not know what OS is installed on the machine

I'm sorry maxse, but I can't see any compelling reason to use Server 2003 of any variety for your purposes. I use it (Standard version) for about 25 PC's and it does all of things you want, but so does Win XP Pro. Mine also does a heck of a lot more (like run Exchange 2003, WSUS, use Group Policies and OU's, run Symantec Antivirus Corporate, run Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange, run login scripts, use IIS for Media Streaming, run Routing and Remote Access etc etc). And even then, it is well protected behind a subnet so no Windows boxes are directly exposed to the internet.

Unless you have a burning desire to spend the money to buy Server 2003 for experimental or educational purposes, I agree with the previous poster that it may be better to use XP. There is nothing you have stipulated that cannot be done with XP Pro.

hmm okay so you guys are saying in order to get the norton updates pushed out to all the computers all I need is symantec corporate? Can you post the exact version numbers?

The only real reason I want 2K3 server is because it is just more stable than XP Pro. Price not being an issue. Which one would you guys pick up? Thanks.

The only real reason I want 2K3 server is because it is just more stable than XP Pro. Price not being an issue. Which one would you guys pick up? Thanks.

585923347[/snapback]

Windows XP Pro is very reliable and will do what you want, but if you want to spend that kind of money and can afford it, go for it! ;)

maxse, when you say "Price not being an issue. Which one would you guys pick up? Thanks." that is different for me. My hard-headed side still makes me want to repeat my previous answer. But, I'd not be entirely honest if I said that because, personally, I like to play around and experiment with different OS's and versions.

I had a lot of fun getting up to speed with Server 2003 and trying out the new functionality and what it could do for me. If price is truly not an issue, I'd say skip the Small Business version of Server 2003 (I'm not a big fan of it at all, but it is pretty good value since they throw in a slightly crippled version of Exchange and a few other goodies). I'd go straight to Standard which IMHO is more versatile.

If you do, I'd probably just get the basic 5-user CAL (licences) initially, but you can add to this as required. (You'd have to check out your local MS website for pricing).

Later on, if you wanted to add other things like MS Exchange 2003, or IAS or whatever, you can. From memory I paid about $AUS1800 (equivalent to $USD1350?) for Exchange with 10 licences, but I can't recall how much the additional licences cost.

Edit added: I forgot to add that I agree with the previous poster that stability should not be an issue with either W2K3 or XP Pro SP 2. Well, at least it's not for me anyway these days - it was a lot different several years ago.

You can get Symantec Groupware (which includes Symantec Antivirus and Symantec Mail Security for MS Exchange) for about $50 per seat or so I think (starting with 10 licences?).

You'll find it to be a little bit of a learning curve with all the bits and pieces you can do on Server 2003, but I found it to be lots of fun. Once you have that mastered, if you really want to start throwing money around, you can go to Enterprise or Datacenter editions - but I hope you have deep pockets!

Your choice, and whatever happens, make sure you enjoy yourself!

Edited by omniphile

To be honest, it doesnt sound like your going to be buying this software. as your giving your self the option of what version.

If i got a *free* copy i would go for Windows 2003 Advanced Server as its the best one. If theres a cost issue just stick with standerd, as it will do MOST things, and theres proberly free alternatives of the extra's on the net.

okay thanks guys. I basically decided to go with 2K3 standard. The thing is though can I just not use the active direcotries and just share the drives and then map them as a dirve letter on the workgroup computers. I really dont have the time to learn how to set up active direcotries and simply dont have the time to play aorund. So I wil be using 2K3 just for its stability. What do you think?

okay thanks guys. I basically decided to go with 2K3 standard. The thing is though can I just not use the active direcotries and just share the drives and then map them as a dirve letter on the workgroup computers. I really dont have the time to learn how to set up active direcotries and simply dont have the time to play aorund. So I wil be using 2K3 just for its stability. What do you think?

585941633[/snapback]

Honestly, 2k3 isn't much more reliable than XP Pro... and for a file server, you might as well use XP Pro or *nix. I don't see any compelling reason to use any type of professional server for what you're doing. You might as well be taking your money and burning it. That said, expect to pay about $300-500 for the OS alone if you choose to stick with 2k3 server.

well I don't know how a meida server works mabye someone can tell me but for you need to use linux. It free you can setup samba with little to no trouble I've know a bunch about linux within 3 months of using it. With the tools out there you can have a nice server and some general knowlege of linux. I use my desektop as a webserver, ftp server, and a desktop (I'm usng nix dual to window ot play games)

dude use linux

if you want to temp web server or ftp server it is so easy to setup with a few tools

I can setup a ftp server in under 10 minutes and apache (web server) also under 10 min plus linux is low on resources. You can even close the graphic user interface down when you aren't confiruging or using the server which would save more space. Try something like debian (no ubuntu, fedora, suse because there setup is kinda goofy) and seriously it a lot easier downloading linux than I pirated version of win 2003

Microsoft Windows Sever 2003 - Enterprise or Standard Edition is your choice with SP1 is prefect :D

eBay have some good deals at times...I did a search for you

eBay UK eBay

Just be careful from whom you buy from.

Edited by DJ Prem
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Euro-Office must default to ODF to be considered "genuinely European", LibreOffice argues by David Uzondu Euro-Office is a web-based collaborative office suite that positions itself as a "European sovereign alternative" to American tech companies, backed by a coalition of developers including Nextcloud, IONOS, Abilian, BTactic, OpenProject, and, more recently, Tuta. The project officially went live a couple of days ago, but not before drawing heavy fire from LibreOffice developers, who called the marketing claim that Euro-Office represents the "first open-source office suite developed in Europe" a deceptive historical inaccuracy because projects like OpenOffice and LibreOffice existed decades earlier. Now that the project has launched, LibreOffice is back with another complaint, arguing that Euro-Office cannot consider itself "genuinely European" while it pushes proprietary Microsoft defaults on users. Euro-Office had promised to improve the OpenDocument Format (ODF) back in April, but the current release still plagues users with several technical failures. For instance, the suite lacks an admin setting to enforce ODF, and mobile editors completely block ODF saves, forcing files into Microsoft's OOXML formats. Some configurations force files into read-only mode, while editing frequently corrupts document formatting or erases data. LibreOffice thinks that merely supporting a format as an afterthought does not make you a sovereign alternative, as file formats are the battleground where" digital sovereignty is won or lost." The road to the first stable release of Euro-Office has been quite bumpy due to an aggressive public fallout with OnlyOffice, from which the coalition originally forked the project. OnlyOffice struck back by accusing the coalition of violating copyright terms under its AGPLv3 branding requirements by stripping the original branding anyway and forking the code. Getting Euro-Office up and running is a bit wonky (at least for non-technical users), as there is no direct installer to grab off the web. The easiest way we learnt is by using Docker. First, pull the official Euro-Office image from the GitHub Container Registry: docker pull ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest Then, run the container with active ports and a secure JWT token, enabling the test environment: docker run -i -t -d -p 8080:80 --restart=always -e EXAMPLE_ENABLED=true -e JWT_SECRET=my_secure_jwt_secret ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest And finally, open a web browser and go to the following address: http://localhost:8080 If you are running this on a remote server, replace localhost with your server's IP address. You will see the Euro-Office test page, where you can create new text documents, spreadsheets, or presentations directly in the browser. Image via Euro-Office Nextcloud promises that proper standalone desktop versions and mobile apps will arrive in a future release.
    • It’s any of their products not just windows.
    • Google Gemini has been failing for users across the United States, Europe, and Asia since early Wednesday morning, June 10, 2026, and more than six hours into the incident Google has yet to declare a fix............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318152/20260610/google-gemini-outage-tops-six-hours-errors-1076-1099-worldwideflash-lite-still-answers.htm
    • Fun fact: There are more Warhammer 40k games than there are stars in the universe.
    • laughing is tedious. Elephants really are laughing lazy, y'all..
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!