deadlogics Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 :alien: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliot Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 At the moment he's innocent. (Y) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julius Caro Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 At the moment he's innocent. (Y) 586020823[/snapback] Good point :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hulibecker Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 Guilty. HOpefully he will get sum of his own when locked up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YBG Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 Guilty or not, the parents should take SOME responisbility. C'mon, why else would you leave your kid there with an older man who you don't even really know, besides knowing that you could sue the pants off of him or get him in trouble? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.pingu Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 innocent till proven guilty seems to have changed to guilty till proven innocent thanks to many twats around the world :ninja: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oceanmotion Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 He will walk away. Still needs serious help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxondale. Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 innocent :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuarterSwede Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 Can't say I'm too sure. What I do know, is that even if he isn't guilty something isn't right with him. If you listen to any of his testimony you'll know what I mean. "I just watched him sleep ... it was really sweet." <- YUCK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spielo Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 I think it's entirely possible that he's guilty, but there's a massive element of doubt in the case, so I don't see how any juror could say he was guilty. I assume it's the case in the US that if there's an element of doubt, you can't usually be found guilty, as it is in the UK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metallithrax Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 Don't know whether he is guilty of the charges or not, but he is guilty of being a weirdo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoXY Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 not sure....:/.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaramonga Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 I'd hang him for FREE......... :happy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forster Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 He will walk away. Still needs serious help. 586020856[/snapback] If he's found innocent of the molestation, he is still guilty of the lesser charges of plying minors with alcohol. I'd hang him for FREE......... :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenny McCormick Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 I think he is guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enriq760 Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 If you have followed Mj's trial, You woul say that he's inocent like I do hehe.. That family it's just full of liars :pinch: And the fact that MJ is weird doesn't make him a child molester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiREFLi Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 innocent till proven guilty seems to have changed to guilty till proven innocent thanks to many twats around the world :ninja: 586020838[/snapback] Isn't it the other way around in other places anyway? Or is that what you meant? :unsure: I think he is guilty 586020883[/snapback] Yes but you actually have no idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 its hard to believe the ammount of people that voted innocent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kr0z Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 Innocent. The man is weird, for sure. But he's no pedaphile or child molester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitteny_berk Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 To be fair, only 2 people *actually* know. Personally, i have no idea, the guy's odd, i'm sure of that. But then, the family has a frikken screwed up history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kr0z Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 its hard to believe the ammount of people that voted innocent... 586022137[/snapback] It is innocent until proven guilty anyway isn't it still? That boy and his mother would make up anything just for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zachman123 Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 Spielo, yep that's correct (I think). For criminal cases, if a juror has a reasonable amount of doubt they should choose innocent, whereas for civil cases it's the opposite, if there's probable cause the plaintiff should get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kr0z Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 Guilty untill proven innocent! He's a peepee toucher! 586022183[/snapback] That's what TV makes us want to think, but this isn't the way the law works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggareis Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 Guilty untill proven innocent! He's a peepee toucher! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macstorm Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 :yes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts