Recommended Posts

I recently found out that my website that I designed to work with IE7 and Firefox 2, doesn't work properly with IE6. I'd like to see a recent chart or something that tells me the percentage of users between IE6 and IE7. Anyone know where I can get one thats updated regularly?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/538810-percentage-of-ie6-to-ie7-users/
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, IE6, however outdated and insecure, is still to widespread to not support it. (Unless you already have a target audience and you know not many people use IE6)

Yea I'd say that updating to IE7 is a must for everyone! :shiftyninja:

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

Developers of software and websites SHOULD stop supporting IE 6!

It is the people's fault if they are still using IE 6. I have no sympathy for them.

1) If they do not trust IE 6, then that is thier fault. They can read reviews on the Internet; or, use their common sense, open their eyes and see the phishing filters and security measures that are staring them right in the face!

2) If they don't like IE 7 then again that is thier fault. They can get FireFox or another browswer (especially one with skins). I'm sure they can find a browser they like, out there somewhere. Or they can just realise that IE 7 is the future and is MUCH better!

3) Too lazy!!!?!!? Again, this is thier fault! If they are too lazy to upgrade (does not take much effort at all), then why can't the developers be too lazy to support IE 6? (which would probably take a little bit more effort to do than a lazy customer clickin "Install" in Windows Update).

I have no sympathy for people who refuse to upgrade to IE 6, it is thier fault. Also, you cannot say that people do not know about IE 7 (I know you haven't, but some will); EVERYBODY who has an Internet connection, and a pair of working eyes, have been informed that a new IE version is out, by Microsoft, through Windows Update and other mediums.

IE 6 is redundant now in my opinion and EVERYBODY should upgrade to IE 7.

P.S. I agree that some small and large business may not have upgraded (e.g. my school), but again, this falls under the "lazy" aspect! It doesn't take more than a day to upgrade a whole school network! And the holidays would be an excellent time, yet alas they still have not.)

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

While I agree that any mission critical and corporate websites must still support IE6, I do encourage everyone to drop support for it in favour of a warning message telling the user to update to IE7 on their personal websites. IE6 needs to be phased out and any little bit to compel a user to update helps.

In terms of market share, it's still very large and yes corporate/business/money-making websites, etc, should still support it. It also depends on the target audience. It'll likely be reasonable if you drop support for IE6 on a website that gets say 10% of IE6 visitors, as in a lot of tech websites.

I understand about the requirements which is one reason why maybe they should support IE 6.

But in reply to the above comment: If people are not genuinely interested in upgrading IE, then it is thier fault if some of thier favorite websites do not show up properly. I have no sympathy for them. Software updates are there for a reason and IE 6 has a newer update - thus making IE 6 OLD and redundant!

Developers of software and websites SHOULD stop supporting IE 6!

wise up.

just like software developers should instantly stop making stuff for XP just because vista has come out?

maybe in a few years...same with IE6. it is so prevalent that only an idiot wouldn't at least try to make their site accessible with IE6. especially if you run a business website where you sell...

When I think about it, it would be stupid for developers to stop supporting IE 6 (however, they should encourage people to upgrade by putting a message in thier site).

I agree fully with the person who wrote the message under my first message, now I think about it.

  • 1 month later...

I'm currently using my dad's computer because the power supply took a dump in my computer, and one of the first things I did was put in 64bit Windows XP and upgrade to IE7. Anyone who is a hardcore internet user (browses the internet for horurs on end) and is up to snuff with internet security will upgrade to IE7 (that's probably why the percentage of IE7 users are so low -- there aren't many people out there who are actually intelligent about internet security). There's no reason not to upgrade to IE7 unless you're using a pirated copy of Windows XP and can't make the transition to IE7. In that case, for your security, use Opera or Firefox 2. Do not use IE6, you're only setting yourself up for a disaster, granted you hit the right website.

predator001: His point is to get people to stop using the insecure IE6 and start using the more secure, and smarter IE7. With all the phishing going around in websites, and fraud, you would be silly not to use IE7 over IE6, granted you have the choice. The problem is, more than half of the Windows XP users actually run a pirated copy of the operating system and can't make the transition to IE7 because of validation issues. Only one of my friends actually use a legit copy of Windows XP, everyone else I know is all illegal. If website developers would stop supporting IE6 and would only support IE7, that would not only imcrase the amount of sales for Microsoft, but it would also ensure that more people are securely browsing the internet.

There are a lot of cool features in Firefox 2, Opera, and IE7 alike, such as tabbed browsing, spell checking, text-to-speech, tighter security, and higher compatibility. Firefox 2 has the spell checking, they all have tabbed browsing, but IE7 has the increased security and compatibility, whereas if you turn to Opera, you have text-to-speech and a lot of bandwidth feedback that neither IE7 nor Firefox 2 provide. The theory here is, if you're using IE6 and you're concerned about your internet security, then stop it -- pick up Firefox 2 or Opera if you can't get passed the validation to install IE7. All three browsers have a lot of innovative freatures that make browsing the internet more secure and fun. I chose IE7 over them all because its's made by Microsoft, which means it's going to have the best compatibility, it has a lot of security features, and it's the "official" supported medium for browsing on more than most of the websites. Firefox 2 has a little bit of compatibility issues with some websites, and so does Opera, but they're all great web browsers, and they're all more secure and more compatibile than IE6.

That is only visitors to the w3c sites... and talk about a massively skewed numbers at that... in the REAL world its no where near 30+% for FF AND ie still accounts for about 80% of the markey in total

  • 10 months later...

Is there a way to find the percentages of the browsers from the portals sites? I would like to know what percentages yahoo, msn, google and aol are getting.

It would be cool if all sites revealed what kind of browsers that they were getting. This way you can find a site that has a similar demographic to yours and use that to base your browser support decisions on. Though I do think it is always a good idea to suport as many browsers as possible. The only exception might be if you are making a site that is targeted at a niche area. If i was making a site for Apple news I would not be to concerned about IE.

  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!