Mount a network folder to a folder instead of a drive?


Recommended Posts

Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

Silly question, but are you just trying to create a folder as follows:

On Server

C:\Some_Folder\folder_with_files_I_Need

On Desktop

C:\Some_Folder\Folder_With_Files_I_Need <------Mapped from server

If this is what you want, then cant you just right click in the folder you want to pace the mapped folder and select create shortcut. Then type in the location such as \\Server\Some_Folder\Folder_With_Files_I_Need.

It worked when i tried it just now, or maybe this is not what you are wanting?

Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

What you have shown looks like it would apply to what i said. Simply delete the current folder in the Etc folder and instead create a shortcut to \\somecomputer\NetFolder.

That was my first try as far as getting this done, but I need Windows and programs to actually see it as a folder, not a shortcut. So that programs/users/Windows think it's on the drive but it's actually, what I guess would be called a "symlink" to the network folder.

A shortcut is only a shortcut so programs won't be able to access the folder on the drive as if they were using the network.

That was my first try as far as getting this done, but I need Windows and programs to actually see it as a folder, not a shortcut. So that programs/users/Windows think it's on the drive but it's actually, what I guess would be called a "symlink" to the network folder.

A shortcut is only a shortcut so programs won't be able to access the folder on the drive as if they were using the network.

If your just worried that users will see its a shortcut, then just use tweak UI to remove the arrow on shortcuts?

Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

We have done what you are asking for on our network here. We change the path on My Documents folder on XP-SP2 from local disk to a location on the server. First, a login script runs that maps a letter to a folder on the server. Then based on that letter, we remove the default under properties on My Documents and change it to "U:\". Since the user already has a mapped drive called "P:\\server-name\user name" the user has access to that drive by simply putting "U:\". In your case, you might want to share the drive/folder first and give proper rights to the user/s.

Well it's not just users, I also need programs to recognize it as an actual folder instead of a shortcut. I may be wrong, but if I put a shortcut called "IamAShortcut" and point it to a folder on the D: drive, and in that folder there is a file called "IamAFile.txt," I am fairly sure I can't type "IAmAShortcut\IamAFile.txt" to access that file. . .

The folder I am trying to create unfortunately isn't in the My Documents folder so that doesn't help, but thanks for the tip :)

Well it's not just users, I also need programs to recognize it as an actual folder instead of a shortcut. I may be wrong, but if I put a shortcut called "IamAShortcut" and point it to a folder on the D: drive, and in that folder there is a file called "IamAFile.txt," I am fairly sure I can't type "IAmAShortcut\IamAFile.txt" to access that file. . .

The folder I am trying to create unfortunately isn't in the My Documents folder so that doesn't help, but thanks for the tip :)

No you couldnt access IamAFile.txt by creating a folder shortcut, but creating a shortcut directly to that file?

Well that would mean having to create shortcuts for every file in the directory, not to mention the programs still couldn't use them to access the files because they end in .lnk instead of the proper extension. I need to basically "fool" programs, etc., into thinking the network folder is on the local disk.

Well that would mean having to create shortcuts for every file in the directory, not to mention the programs still couldn't use them to access the files because they end in .lnk instead of the proper extension. I need to basically "fool" programs, etc., into thinking the network folder is on the local disk.

I really dont understand the problem with what i said? You can even turn on syncronisation to make the drive available offline.

I think either you or I am missing or not understanding eachother, because i have what i said working at home and it works flawlessely.

If I just create a shortcut called "ThisFolder" in "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc" and point it to "\\somecomputer\NetFolder," and in the NetFolder there is a file called "file.txt" I won't be able to access said file with the path "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder\file.txt" because it's a shortcut not an actual folder. In Windows if you double click the shortcut it will take you to the target directory, but if I use the Start->Run box or if a program tries to access it like that, it won't be able to find the file because the shortcut is not an actual folder on the drive.

Sorry for not being clear before :)

If I just create a shortcut called "ThisFolder" in "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc" and point it to "\\somecomputer\NetFolder," and in the NetFolder there is a file called "file.txt" I won't be able to access said file with the path "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder\file.txt" because it's a shortcut not an actual folder. In Windows if you double click the shortcut it will take you to the target directory, but if I use the Start->Run box or if a program tries to access it like that, it won't be able to find the file because the shortcut is not an actual folder on the drive.

Sorry for not being clear before :)

Ah ok, i think i see what your saying.

Then you would type it as follows:

c:\Test\Test\somefile.exe.lnk

That would work, but probably not what you are looking for.

Sorry for getting abrupt, but i really didnt understand what the problem was for you.

SysInternals (now Windows SysInternals) have a tool called Junction which allows you to create mount points (symbolic links) through you file system. Windows doesn't actually support this for remote shares, but local folders it works a treat. Junction is a console application, it has no UI.

You can download it from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysintern...k/Junction.mspx

Usage: junction <junction> <target>

e.g junction C:\Tools\MyFolder C:\Windows\System32.

When you explore C:\Tools\MyFolder, you are actually exploring System32.

Hope that helps.

SysInternals (now Windows SysInternals) have a tool called Junction which allows you to create mount points (symbolic links) through you file system. Windows doesn't actually support this for remote shares, but local folders it works a treat. Junction is a console application, it has no UI.

You can download it from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysintern...k/Junction.mspx

Usage: junction <junction> <target>

e.g junction C:\Tools\MyFolder C:\Windows\System32.

When you explore C:\Tools\MyFolder, you are actually exploring System32.

Hope that helps.

Thanks for the tip, I actually tried junction yesterday and found out it doesn't have that functionality for network folders. :)

I think it's time I gave up on this, it doesn't appear that it can be done. If it could I'm sure I would have found a solution by now, or someone here would know something - for sure before I would. :) Thanks to all that tried to help me, it's much appreciated.

Have you tried mounting the network forder as a local Drive:

Then use juntion to "juntion" the local drive to the folder you want.

\\Network folder\ -> Drive x:

juntion x -> c: \whatever\juntion folder\

Actually yes. . . it appears that any and all programs I've found/tried only work on physical volumes, not virtual drives as I think they're called. It didn't work in Disk Management or with any of the programs I've tried.

Never mind this thread, I gave up on this already :) Thanks for all the help though.

If a mod could close this thread?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!