Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
start-run-CMD

use command line :

c:

ren A " /"

post-218458-1201060086_thumb.jpg

all done!

post-218458-1201060336.jpg

remove the folder use this command:

c:

rmdir " /" /s

Actually there is an easier way to hide the name of the folder.

Right click the folder and choose to rename it, them, hold down the "ALT key and type 0160, then, release the ALT key and tap the ENTER key......all gone.

^ That hardly offers any protection. A find/search can easily reveal the files contained in the folder. Using a different program other than windows explorer will reveal it.

Besides, it's not even completly invisible. Anyone who knows this trick will be able to "unhide" the folder. Also, it's quite obvious that there's an "invisible" folder. (Ref image in post #1)

If you want any decent protection, you should use windows' builtin permissions support (disable Simple File Sharing , or use CACLS). For added protection, you can even use encryption. In this way, the files/folder will not only be hidden, but also protected such that thirdparty programs or even windows can't access it.

If you want it *really* hidden such that even recovery programs or other OSes cant even detect that a file ever existed, then use TrueCrypt.

--

Cheap tricks like this will only work against 5 year olds.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!