Norton Ghost 14


Recommended Posts

In this review, I will show you some features and tools of Norton Ghost 14.

Norton Ghost 14 Home screens

ng14homeig3.jpg

After the install and initial configuration, whenever you start up Norton Ghost 14, you will see a screen like this.

ng14statushc0.jpg

When you click on the Status tab, it will bring you to this screen. As you can see, I have made a back up of some files and folders on the 12th of February. It'll give you a status for each drive.

ng14taskspc6.jpg

When you click the Tasks tab, it will bring you to this screen. Here you can run or manage backups, perform a one time backup, recover my computer, recover files, and run the recovery point browser.

ng14toolshz5.jpg

Here is the Tools tab and here lie some pretty nice tools, especially convert to Virtual Disk.

ng14advanceug9.jpg

And as you can see, this is the Advance tab. A little less flashly but it gets to the point.

Recovery Disk

ng14rdhomelz8.jpg

When you boot into the recovery disk, this will be the first screen that you see. Pretty much all you can do in this tab is recover your computer.

ng14rdrecoveroj4.jpg

This would be the Recover tab, you only get one more option than the Home tab and that is to recover files.

ng14rdanalyzedk7.jpg

The Analyze tab. Here you can scan for viruses, check for errors, explore, and open a command line window.

ng14rdnetworkyr3.jpg

This is the Network tab. A few more options here, all of them self explanitory.

ng14rdutilitiesrk9.jpg

The last and final tab, the Utilities tab. These again are self explanitory.

If you have used one back-up program, you have used the rest. After having Norton Ghost 14 on my computer for almost a week now, it surprises and dissappoints. I wouldn't say it is a bad program at all. It's good at what it does and for most people, it will suffice. It's fairly easy and simple to get around and use. I beta tested this from the first build and it has improved a lot on some of the hang-ups that were first encountered. A big dissappointment and constant feature request is to be able to create an image from the recovery disk. Symantec has not delivered on our multiple requests in my experience of testing the newer Ghost versions. I would probably recommend this program to people if they needed a program to back-up their files and drives. As for the price, I have no clue because I received this for beta testing it.

Pros:

+Simple to use

+Good tools and utilities

+If you've used one, you've used them all

Cons:

-Unable to create an image from the recovery disk

-If you've used one, you've used them all

If there is anything you want to to go deeper into or clarify, please feel free to post and I will update my review to reflect those inqueries.

biohazard

Edited by biohazard
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/620696-norton-ghost-14/
Share on other sites

If all you want to do is to back up your computer, both work fine. But if you want to make an image, I would go with Acronis. I've used Acronis TrueImage and it gets the job done. So it's pretty much down to if you want to make an image or not. It's been awhile since I've used Acronis, but I think it has some of the same features.

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for posting this - I've been using Ghost 10.0, not to back up but to copy the entire C: drive on to 3 different USB HD's as my backups. I do this about 3 times a week, rotating among the drives. This way I figure I can plug any of them into another computer if mine fails -- which it has.

Ghost 10.0 started to give me weird error messages, then all of a sudden it kept trying to install itself and reboot the computer in an endless loop! I was able to F8 it and get in and stop it, then I de-installed it.

I bought and downloaded Paragon 8.5 after reading good stuff about it, and I've been playing with it for a week and have not been able to get it to successfully create an image or drive copy. It backs up using its weird formatting, but I don't want that because I don't trust that I'll be able to de-code the archive when the time comes. I want a straight backup where I can go in and grab exact folders, files, etc.

So it was back to the drawing board and just as I was about to pull out the card and buy Ghost 14.0, I read this and decided 10.0 was good enough for me, so I reinstalled it. Fortunately, I still have the disk and box. It's worked for me for a couple of years with no problems, so I'll give it another chance. And, it's "free" (to me anyway).

Don't know why these companies mess with backup software -- once you get used to using it, the last thing you want is to have some new interface or untested features. Of all software, backup software should have very deliberate, controlled and tested incremental changes, in my opinion, without any major surprises. Once you get used to it and know the ins and outs, you don't want to mess with a lot of change when the time comes to actually use it.....

Ziggy.

  • 4 months later...
would I be able to use Ghost 14 to make a bootable image; similar to DELL's purple CD that they send with new systems, which can be used to restore the PC back to factory default?

Dell's purple CD is just a Windows CD with Dell's Royalty OEM key and drivers on it. There's no image of anything.

Thanks for posting this - I've been using Ghost 10.0, not to back up but to copy the entire C: drive on to 3 different USB HD's as my backups. I do this about 3 times a week, rotating among the drives. This way I figure I can plug any of them into another computer if mine fails -- which it has.

Ghost 10.0 started to give me weird error messages, then all of a sudden it kept trying to install itself and reboot the computer in an endless loop! I was able to F8 it and get in and stop it, then I de-installed it.

I bought and downloaded Paragon 8.5 after reading good stuff about it, and I've been playing with it for a week and have not been able to get it to successfully create an image or drive copy. It backs up using its weird formatting, but I don't want that because I don't trust that I'll be able to de-code the archive when the time comes. I want a straight backup where I can go in and grab exact folders, files, etc.

So it was back to the drawing board and just as I was about to pull out the card and buy Ghost 14.0, I read this and decided 10.0 was good enough for me, so I reinstalled it. Fortunately, I still have the disk and box. It's worked for me for a couple of years with no problems, so I'll give it another chance. And, it's "free" (to me anyway).

Don't know why these companies mess with backup software -- once you get used to using it, the last thing you want is to have some new interface or untested features. Of all software, backup software should have very deliberate, controlled and tested incremental changes, in my opinion, without any major surprises. Once you get used to it and know the ins and outs, you don't want to mess with a lot of change when the time comes to actually use it.....

Ziggy.

That weird error message I had a theory back when I was testing version 7 I believe (it has been a while ago). But What fixed my issue back then- Something to do with rewriting over and over with similar images. Was to Actually put the Install Cd and do a full Format over the drive. Before ghosting the image back to the drive. Also note another thought is make sure that you have Indexing (Volume Copy/Shadow copy) turned off for the USB drive. I have heard of issues with that as well.

Though With the Light Weight Linux Boot Distributions... You probably could boot with them then use them to format over the drive to NTFS. Then Restore your image.

That is just my thoughts on the Error Messages..

As far as the Review- Top Notch- but please add for me Screens of System Usage (CPU Load/Memory Usage) I found that when I tested 9 it was a resource Hog. Since then I have given up on it. Other than using 9 to Ghost right after a fresh install. To a hard drive that I remove shortly after.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ahh, I didn't know that. It makes sense. I was thinking I would be fine with 50 hours, but 100 is close enough that I wouldn't feel like I am paying for more than I am using. I might check it out sometime.
    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
    • As much as I love owning my own hardware, it's hard to argue with the value. I'm not a huge gamer, I'd actually be interested in a cheaper plan with limited monthly hours, or even a pay-by-the-hour plan.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!