Setting up Simple Web Server


Recommended Posts

My dad is planning on starting a website, but only wants to pay for ~100 MB of storage, but he knows he will need much more space. He asked me to turn one of the computers in the house into a web server. We have the following computers (from newest to oldest):

- His Laptop: Compaq Presario Z3000T, Intel Core 2 Duo 1.66 GHz, 1 GB DDR2 Memory, 80 GB Hard Disk, 8x DVD-RW, Windows Vista Business, 128 MB Intel GMA950

- My Laptop: HP Pavilion dv1000, Intel Pentium M 1.73 GHz, 1.5 GB DDR400 Memory, 80 GB Hard Disk, 8x DVD-RW, Windows XP Professional SP3 RC2, 128 MB Intel GMA900

- His Desktop: HP Vectra VL400, Intel Pentium III 1 GHz, 128 MB PC133 Memory, 20 GB Hard Disk, 32x CD-ROM, Windows 2000 Professional SP4, 16 MB Intel i810 Graphics

- My Desktop (planned web server): Compaq Deskpro EN, Intel Pentium III 550 MHz, 448 MB PC100 Memory, 40 GB Hard Disk, 16x DVD-ROM, 4x4x24x CD-RW, Windows XP Professional SP2, 64 MB nVidia GeForce 4 MX440

- My Mac: PowerMac G3 Blue and White, G3 400 MHz, 256 MB PC100 Memory, 10 GB Hard Disk, 16x DVD-RW, Mac OS X 10.3.9, 16 MB ATI Rage 128

As you can see, the planned server already has XP, but it runs slowly. We aren't looking towards much traffic, but we are going to upload a lot of data and point to a lot of data. What is the best distro to use to make this a web server, but keep the system as a workstation (I am looking towards running things like Firefox and OpenOffice Writer - not too much)?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625904-setting-up-simple-web-server/
Share on other sites

I would strongly suggest paying for hosting especially if the website is for business.

How fast is your broadband out?

Takes certain amount security issues away.

Hosting will probably be alot more reliable.

Cost running comp for 24hrs a day for few visits be higher than cost hosting. (Hosting better environment as servers on anyway)

To mention just small few reasons.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!