• 0

Is there a better addressbook for Outlook 03


Question

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thank You Gary. But it doesn't integrate with Outlook, right?

Joel, I agree that using Contacts view or Contact section of Outlook is really good, but even that is not enough under certain conditions.

For example you cannot just type the name or e-mail address of the person you are looking for and have it just minimize the results, you still have to go through all of your contact before finding the correct person. It is just not that easy when you have 2000 contacts.

What I would love is the auto complete with either first name, last name, displayed name, company or e-mail address as I am typing or with some sort of fast search. That would have been great.

  • 0
Thank You Gary. But it doesn't integrate with Outlook, right?

Joel, I agree that using Contacts view or Contact section of Outlook is really good, but even that is not enough under certain conditions.

For example you cannot just type the name or e-mail address of the person you are looking for and have it just minimize the results, you still have to go through all of your contact before finding the correct person. It is just not that easy when you have 2000 contacts.

What I would love is the auto complete with either first name, last name, displayed name, company or e-mail address as I am typing or with some sort of fast search. That would have been great.

I guess it doesn't. Sorry. Upgrade to Outlook 2007. It is great and use the contacts and not the address book . You may have to fiddle with the options.

  • 0
I am going to have to try 2007, can't say that I am a fan of the "ribbon". Thanks anyway. I just thought there would be an add-on or plugin for Outlook which would make the address book view better and more functional.

The only time I used Outlook 2003 was on my company's network. They used an exchange server and the contacts had thousands of names but it was on their mail server. It did not look like the one that you showed.

  • 0
Joel, I agree that using Contacts view or Contact section of Outlook is really good, but even that is not enough under certain conditions.

For example you cannot just type the name or e-mail address of the person you are looking for and have it just minimize the results, you still have to go through all of your contact before finding the correct person. It is just not that easy when you have 2000 contacts.

What I would love is the auto complete with either first name, last name, displayed name, company or e-mail address as I am typing or with some sort of fast search. That would have been great.

You can. Have you ever tried? Type the name in the To: field and compose your message and send. If you're not talking about when you compose, then please explain what exactly you're trying to accomplish. If you're talking sorting, sort by Categories if you don't have a field that suits you for sorting in the default views, or customise a view.

  • 0

Gary, this is also my company's e-mail and calender stuff but we do not use Exchange server. The contacts are just stored locally on each workstation.

Joel, yes it is what I am talking about. I compose a new message, and type like ' Bob ' on the To: field, and hit "Check Names" or just hit "Send", if there isn't a single Bob on my "Contacts", the screen shot I posted on my First Post shows up. This screen does not allow me to sort by any of the field I mentioned. Neither I can customize the fields.

Do you run Outlook 2003? Could you please go to compose new e-mail and just type a random name and hit check names and post the name selection screen? Just to see if yours is any different or if you can sort by any one of the fields.

Sure, we can sort by anything on the Contacts section of Outlook, but not on its Address Book or whatever it is using when composing a new e-mail. I think it is called "Select Names" dialog. Outlook only allows sort by Last Name or by Display Name, which has to go through options and not directly on the dialog screen.

  • 0

Problem is not Bob, but when you just know someone's company or the way it is put in your address book.

Composing new message is not a problem, but when replying or forwarding is, because you cannot really pick a name or add someone using Select Names dialog.

Anyway, I think I am going to get used to it. I am going to try to change it so it sorts by Display Name instead to see if it gets easier.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!