• 0

Nvidia Geforce 175.16 WHQL


Question

-WHQL Certified for Windows XP, VISTA

-Supports GeForce FX, 6, 7, 8, and 9 series GPUs including these newly released GPUs:

GeForce 9800 GX2

GeForce 9800 GTX

GeForce 9600 GT

GeForce 9600 GSO

GeForce 8300

GeForce 8200/ nForce 730a

GeForce 8100/NVIDIA nForce 720a

-Supports single GPU and NVIDIA SLI? technology* on DirectX 9 and OpenGL.

-Adds new PureVideo HD features for GeForce 9800 GX2, 9800 GTX, 9600 GT and 9600 GSO:

Dynamic Contrast Enhancement

Dynamic Blue, Green & Skin Tone Enhancements

Dual-Stream Decode Acceleration**

-Improved performance on many DirectX 9 and OpenGL applications.

-Numerous game and application compatibility fixes. Please read the release notes for more information on product support, features, driver fixes and known compatibility issues.

-Users without US English operating systems can select their language and download the International driver here.

GPU overclocking and temperature monitoring is available by installing NVIDIA System Tools software.

* Note:Quad SLI technology with GeForce 9800 GX2, 3-way SLI technology, and Hybrid SLI technology are only supported on Windows Vista.

** Note: Users will require updated software from third-party movie players to experience the new Dual-Stream decode acceleration for Blu-ray and HD DVD playback features.

VISTA x86

VISTA x64

XP x86

XP x64

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636727-nvidia-geforce-17516-whql/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Should work on the 7600 GS....Why it doesnt i dont know....A bug perhaps.

I got an error that said there is not a driver on this machine that is compatible. I then looked at Nvidia's website and this release is not posted there. Their latest is the 169.25???

  • 0
These are though GeForce Release 175.16 WHQL Release Date: May 13, 2008 using them right now.
I have solved the mystery as to why this will not install. It does not support the Geforce 7600GS.

Well then I don't know. I will try it again later. It probably won't do my card much good anyway.

  • 0
Well then I don't know. I will try it again later. It probably won't do my card much good anyway.

Go have a look at laptopvideo2go.com and see if there's already a modded INF file for these. That's what I'll be doing to get them installed on my laptop (a 7300 Go) which will almost certainly not be officially supported.

  • 0
I got an error that said there is not a driver on this machine that is compatible. I then looked at Nvidia's website and this release is not posted there. Their latest is the 169.25???

If you do their auto-search or insert another graphics card version it will give these drivers. I get exactly the same and I'm using the 32-bit Vista WHQL 175.16 driver package and trying to update my PNY Geforce 7600GS to no avail.

I'm used to seeing the word "forceware" in the installer but I don't see it here.

Anyone any ideas?

Edited by Ex_Brit
  • 0
If you do there auto-search or insert another board version it will give these drivers. I get exactly the same and I'm using the 32-bit Vista WHQL 175.16 driver package and trying to update my PNY Geforce 7600GS to no avail.

I'm used to seeing the word "forceware" in the installer but I don't see it here.

Anyone any ideas?

There must be a problem with the driver.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!