About to become a new Mac user


Recommended Posts

Im saving up for an expensive mac (still not sure if I want a laptop or desktop) for production. I plan to use all Adobe products, Final Cut Studio, Garage Band, and other production software for it.

Now that being said, ill also use it for personal use too like browsing and listening to music. So, is there anything I should know before I start using it? Are there ANY good AV software for it or are they not so good (I am a tech geek so I know there are no major mac viruses yet, I just dont want to be unprotected when the day comes even though I never get viruses on windows)? What are your thought on getting a laptop or desktop? I plan to spend at least $4,000 or close to it regardless of the type, since I need all the power I can get. It will take me a while to get that money, so new versions will be out probably

The only problem is, I doubt I could run two high-powered desktops at the same time in my room (windows PC will be for programming and general use too) but I really could use the power of a desktop (especially for video production). I guess I could get parallels or something.

Anyway, let me know what you guys think and any advice you could give me, please do :p

Oh, is there a screen recorder on the Mac like Camtasia is on Windows?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/644858-about-to-become-a-new-mac-user/
Share on other sites

For media production there is nothing better than a desktop (in both mac or windows based pcs) but the Macbook Pro its not too shaby either and it can be upgraded manually pretty easy to 4GBs of RAM, I mean, if you also would like some portability with your projects.

As far as I know McAfee has an OS X of its antivirus.

In your case i'd go with a MacBook Pro with 4GB of RAM, unless you feel you need a 24" screen, in that case get the iMac with 4GB

As for Viruses, seriously man, common sense will solve 99% of virus issues on all platforms. All Anti-Virus will do is slow down the machine big time, and norton and mcafee do more damage than good.

As for a screen recorder, IShowU is what I use, brilliant little application.

Your other general apps include, Safari, Mail, Adium, Skype (maybe), Transmission, Transmit. You can find all kinds of info on the Mac Software forum.

In your case i'd go with a MacBook Pro with 4GB of RAM, unless you feel you need a 24" screen

Depends of the projects. Most of my scanned films are over to 13,000 x 8,000 pixels. The bigger the screen the better.

How can you know if there is any 'good' mac antivirus software, if none of them have a chance to be tested yet.

It is best to save your money and go without antivirus software for your Mac right now.

When a virus does come, news will quickly spread around the Mac newswire. There will be 4 possible outcomes to it:

- Workarounds will be available to avoid it, and manual instructions will be available to remove it.

- Someone will release a freeware tool to protect/clean the virus

- Apple will release a freeware tool/Software Update to protect/clean the virus

- If an antivirus product is required, a clear favourite will emerge from the community as to which one should be used.

As for Viruses, seriously man, common sense will solve 99% of virus issues on all platforms. All Anti-Virus will do is slow down the machine big time, and norton and mcafee do more damage than good.

Yeah, I sometimes turn off auto protect on windows, even though windows users complain what I do I have never gotten a virus on Windows.

I was either thinking the Mac Pro or the MacBook Pro

As of right now (if I had the money) this is what I would get:

Mac Pro:

Two 3.0GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon

4GB (4x1GB)

320GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB

MacBook Pro

2.6GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

4GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM - 2x2GB

200GB Serial ATA @ 7200 rpm

SuperDrive 8X DVD+R DL/DVD+RW/CD-RW)

MacBook Pro 17-inch Hi-Resolution Glossy Widescreen Display

I think the Mac Pros are overpowered in all honesty. For what you're doing I dont see any need for a machine that expensive.

Future Proof: Mac Pro + Snow Leopard next year + CS5 suite in about three years = A monster machine sporting a very optimized OS running very optimized apps. A setup like this can last 5 years or even more.

Hell, my lowly MacBook Pro will fly with that combination of software.

Seriously? My current computer is WAYY too slow (Core 2 E6600, 4GB of ram, Photoshop CS3) Using photoshop with a large amount of layers and wallpaper size documents really slows my computer down.

Heavy video, audio, AND image production will require as much power as possible wont it?

A Core2 with 4GB of RAM running on a 64-bit operating system should fly along even using a ton of Photoshop layers, hell I used to work with PSDs with 50+ layers at a resolution of 20000x10000+ on a Pentium 4 with no major slowdowns.

I know this is a Mac section, but what OS and Anti-Virus do you have?

Seriously? My current computer is WAYY too slow (Core 2 E6600, 4GB of ram, Photoshop CS3) Using photoshop with a large amount of layers and wallpaper size documents really slows my computer down.

Heavy video, audio, AND image production will require as much power as possible wont it?

Sounds strange, thats not a bad system at all. Maybe you have some software or even some hardware problems.

As I said before, I work with images that are hundres of megs, even some psd files over 1gb and while its true its not a totally smooth experience its not way too slow.

Sounds strange, thats not a bad system at all. Maybe you have some software or even some hardware problems.

As I said before, I work with images that are hundres of megs, even some psd files over 1gb and while its true its not a totally smooth experience its not way too slow.

I asked for help on this a few months ago here, and loads of other places and nobody could help me out. I tried all new hardware, formatting, different ram quantities, both 32-bit and 64-bit, and both XP and Vista. XP performs just as bad, and sometimes worse. Games/movies lag every few seconds (jumping occurring) sometimes. Yes I have tried doing these things on a clean boot, no AV on, and nothing running in the BG but I still experience problems.

Sometimes it takes 1 minute or so to open My Computer or a program.

Im hoping a mac would be better for design since im tired of spending loads of money to fix a problem like this

The way I see it is Windows users just don't understand how powerful hardware really is. These C2D's these days are amazing. Windows, in a way just builds up some stupid windows mentality among users that they need faster hardware, when in all honesty I just think they need a faster OS.

Now your spending $4000? You don't need to. For what you said, I would recommend a MBP, even the base spec. Or any of the iMacs. Whichever your choice make sure you get minimum 4GB RAM to start with, add more in later years if required. The difference RAM makes in OSX is by far the greatest in terms of overall system performance. Performance difference so large that I am confident that my 2.0GHz C2D could last me another 5 years if I wanted it to, so long as you got a nice amount of RAM.

Don't know why people come in here asking if they should get a laptop or desktop to be honest. I mean thats up to do, whether you need portability or not.

Either way a system running MacOS will fulfill your needs. Hell, Id be pretty sure you could even get away with a MB using a X1300 integrated. But im not sure how much graphics power Final Cut etc uses. Which is why I say any of the MBP's will do you nicely.

Edited by se7en.hu
I asked for help on this a few months ago here, and loads of other places and nobody could help me out. I tried all new hardware, formatting, different ram quantities, both 32-bit and 64-bit, and both XP and Vista. XP performs just as bad, and sometimes worse. Games/movies lag every few seconds (jumping occurring) sometimes. Yes I have tried doing these things on a clean boot, no AV on, and nothing running in the BG but I still experience problems.

Sometimes it takes 1 minute or so to open My Computer or a program.

Im hoping a mac would be better for design since im tired of spending loads of money to fix a problem like this

You must have some problem somewhere with your system, it should run everything (inc Photoshop) just fine. You should not experence any 'lagging' video nor should it take one minute for a new Explorer window to appear.

Even if I edit huge audio files of video files a laptop will be good enough? With my experience with my current E6600 has me worried.

With a desktop I could get 8GB of ram, 8 cores, and more space for around the same price range.

You must have some problem somewhere with your system, it should run everything (inc Photoshop) just fine. You should not experence any 'lagging' video nor should it take one minute for a new Explorer window to appear.

I tried everything possible, and spent months trying to solve it. Maybe I keep getting bad hardware :p While I am saving for a mac, im going to upgrade this computer one last time with a new motherboard and either an E8400 or a quad core

I wouldn't bother upgrading that other computer unless you used an OS on it that could actually use the hardware available to it. Say if you put some linux distro on it, it would be a very nice computer. But would probably lack all the commercial software that you require.

I say this because I got friends that run Vista and my brothers 900MHz eeePC (running Ubuntu) performs faster then their C2D rigs (general OS performance, not Photoshop or anything related).

On another note, I really dont know exactly how much processing power you require for the work you do. But non-the-less ridding yourself of this windows mentality concept should apply.

Remember though, with a MBP - The Genius's at  HQ have figured out a way to enable the GPU to execute instructions meant for the CPU. Effectively making the GPU another CPU. Amazing. Thats coming in Snow Leopard though, whenever that may be.

Perhaps goto an Apple Center and ask them there if you can try it out. Install your software there and then see if it is fast enough for you.

Yeah, try replacing the motherboard. Shouldn't run you more than $150 for a good one. Personally I'm skeptical of nForce based motherboards these days. ;)

Not discouraging you from diving into Apple hardware, but your computer's far from 'slow.'

Never buy RAM from Apple. They charge a ridiculous amount for it. I bought 4GB (2x2GB) of RAM from Macsales.com for $220, for a total of 6GB in my machine. Apple wants $500 just for 4GB.

And second of all, you don't need the eight core Mac Pro, considering that there are not many, if any, apps that will use all eight cores. Just get the fastest quad core you can, and use the extra money to get more RAM. The Mac Pro can hold up to 32GB, so I think you'll be set. ;)

Im saving up for an expensive mac (still not sure if I want a laptop or desktop) for production. I plan to use all Adobe products, Final Cut Studio, Garage Band, and other production software for it.

Now that being said, ill also use it for personal use too like browsing and listening to music. So, is there anything I should know before I start using it? Are there ANY good AV software for it or are they not so good (I am a tech geek so I know there are no major mac viruses yet, I just dont want to be unprotected when the day comes even though I never get viruses on windows)? What are your thought on getting a laptop or desktop? I plan to spend at least $4,000 or close to it regardless of the type, since I need all the power I can get. It will take me a while to get that money, so new versions will be out probably

The only problem is, I doubt I could run two high-powered desktops at the same time in my room (windows PC will be for programming and general use too) but I really could use the power of a desktop (especially for video production). I guess I could get parallels or something.

Anyway, let me know what you guys think and any advice you could give me, please do :p

Oh, is there a screen recorder on the Mac like Camtasia is on Windows?

Congrats on your decision to purchase a Mac, I don't think you will regret it.

From what you are saying here, your problem is very easily resolved. If you are going to be doing that much work on the machine you will want the Mac Pro, notebooks are wonderful however for the type of work you are mentioning I would want redundancy in hard drives (RAID) to protect my data which is something that just can't be done on a Laptop.

The additional factor is that you could very easily kill off your Windows PC with a Mac Pro through the use of Boot Camp or a virtualization software such as Parallels Desktop for Mac. Both solutions provide you the ability to run your PC oriented software from a single machine at greater than native, or native, speeds depending upon the applications. Depending on which applications you use currently on your PC one solution or the other may be more suited, and if you cared to post those applications here I'm sure that someone or I can help you determine the best solution for you.

When viewing the Apple Refurbished Store, I was able to locate the following machine to give you an idea what you can get there for the approximate $4,000 budget you mentioned.

Refurbished Mac Pro 8-core 3.2GHz Intel Xeon

Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors

2GB (2 x 1GB) of 800MHz DDR2 ECC fully buffered DIMM

500GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s 7200-rpm hard drive

Two 16x SuperDrives (DVD?R DL/DVD?RW/CD-RW)

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB (two dual-link DVI ports)

Your price$4,099.00 b>

Memory upgrades from Crucial can be found at http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.asp...%20%288-core%29.

I feel that is a wonderful and powerful workstation for virtually any task you could throw at it:):)

Now, as for Anti-Virus... Don't waste your computing cycles with a program that has no purpose at this time. Antivirus for the Mac is, at current, a pointless endeavor. Should viruses start to become common place for the Mac, which I doubt will happen in the near future, you then can look into a product to take care of the problem. If you exercise caution in your day to day operations, such as not providing your Administrator Password to any applications you are not familiar with, you will be fine.

If I can help further with this, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Future Proof: Mac Pro + Snow Leopard next year + CS5 suite in about three years = A monster machine sporting a very optimized OS running very optimized apps. A setup like this can last 5 years or even more.

Hell, my lowly MacBook Pro will fly with that combination of software.

So in 3 years, the machine will be very good, and can then last 5 years or more? Macs aren't made of magic hardware, it may "last" as in it won't break down but it won't be great in 7 years just because it's a mac.

Actually, 7 year old Macs are still (marginally) capable of running everything up until the latest version of Mac OS 10.5, they are still fully capable of running Mac OS 10.4 Tiger and all of it's latest 10.4.x revisions.

They may not be magic, however, Apple takes extreme pride in insuring their software and hardware have such a symbiotic relationship that endures far longer than that of a traditional PC.

Come on now, "symbiotic relationship", you sound like an Apple sales rep, i would bet there's more 7 year old PCs than there are 7 year old macs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!