Nvidia Physx Performance + new drivers


physx perfomance  

44 members have voted

  1. 1. Did enabling the physx on your hardware Drown you or make you Fly

    • Fly
      31
    • Drown
      13


Recommended Posts

so basically wondering what Hardware you all are running and your performance with the new drivers and physx fluid demo and or any other physx based demo something just for fun

3800x2

2GB ram

8600GTS

Fluid demo performance Fraps 22FPS and 2FPS software mode on windows vista 32bit ultimate all up to date

Poll Options Mean:

Fly means better FPS performance

drown means lower FPS worse performance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 FPS with hardware enabled, only about 30% CPU usage.

2 FPS with software only, 100% CPU usage.

8400GS. Yeah I know, I didn't expect much from a card I bought for $8. :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 8400GS can't do PhysX even if it do Cuda...

where do you get that from? the release says all 8/9/200 cards are supported as long as they have 256mb of memory which my 8600gt does (512mb) and i assume trashpickinman's 8400gs has 256mb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 8400GS has 256MB. I can select 'Geforce Physx' in hardware device selection, and it shows it as 'HW' mode in the fluid demo. With 'no acceleration' selected 'SW' mode is shown in the demo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i tried a small program called phyX fluidmark it does some benchmarking for phyX

phyX thro CPU (software mode )got about ~1286 point

about 22 fps on average

post-254628-1218645018_thumb.jpg

phyX thro gpu got about ~5300 point

much smoother 89 fps average some major improvment over cpu mode :D

post-254628-1218645092_thumb.jpg

edit : waired the screenshot doesn't show up

Edited by Skynetfuture
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone tried these drivers with any games (LOTRO in particular)?

I have played LOTRO for a couple hours after installing these drivers, work just fine, exactly like 177.99 BETAs. Work just fine in Crysis, TF2, UT3 and FEAR as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This fluid demo a seperate download or the one included with the drivers? (the ones found in PhysX options) I was feeling brave and decided to try them to see how badly it would run on my 8600GTS and it ran smooth with PhysX on and off :blink: I must be doing something wrong...I'm guessing it's probally a seperate application? where you get it from? Nvidia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This fluid demo a seperate download or the one included with the drivers? (the ones found in PhysX options) I was feeling brave and decided to try them to see how badly it would run on my 8600GTS and it ran smooth with PhysX on and off :blink: I must be doing something wrong...I'm guessing it's probally a seperate application? where you get it from? Nvidia?

Try here: http://www.nvidia.com/content/forcewithin/us/download.asp it's the last one on the list, just uncheck all the other boxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want smoother performance, use GTX2xx or 9800 as a main GPU and a 9600GT as a GPU that will be in charge of PhysX.

There is only one problem, and that is that you will need a little more blood (money). :)

EDIT: This is meant for PhysX enabled games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first PhysX enabled game I tried, UT3, suffered in the PhysX Mod Pack maps. In Lighthouse, after blowing half the walls to bits, FPS dropped to 4. :| Tornado wasn't all that much better; a 9-bot CTF match with the tornado ripping through the map pulled frames down to 10.

Honestly, that doesn't look impressive in the least. Something like what Alan Wake demonstrated with Intel CPUs and Havok was far better, and probably less taxing on the system to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.