The World 2.3, first alternative trident shell to use IE8 engine


Recommended Posts

So they're packaging IE8 trident in with their release, how is MS happy with that?

If they're just using the system install, then it's a moot issue.

they are using the system install, you have to install IE8beta to get the option to use IE rendering.

The thing is, so far it seems it's the only alternative trident shell doing this. all the other trident shells are still keep using IE7 trident, even if you have an IE8beta installed.

they are using the system install, you have to install IE8beta to get the option to use IE rendering.

The thing is, so far it seems it's the only alternative trident shell doing this. all the other trident shells are still keep using IE7 trident, even if you have an IE8beta installed.

I think it's probably a API call you need to use to switch into IE8 standards mode, if other shells are still using IE7 behaviour.

Kinda stupid actually (If it's the case), it should behave the same way as normal IE8.

Maxthon is already has IE8 engine support.

nope, Maxthon has "IE8 compatibility", means it no longer acts up weird after you install IE8beta, however it still uses the IE7 engine. Going to Acid2 test (or Acid3 test) clearly shows that.

http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/1...des-in-ie8.aspx

It's not an API call, it's a registry key.

:facepalm:

Edit: Apparently you should also be able to do it by calling the CoInternetSetFeatureEnabled function with the FEATURE_NATIVE_DOCUMENT_MODE setting, but whether that works or not is a different matter.

Edit: That was for Beta 1, for Beta 2 it's FEATURE_BROWSER_EMULATION, and the key has changed, http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/08/2...ew.aspx#8903587

Edited by The_Decryptor
I think it's probably a API call you need to use to switch into IE8 standards mode, if other shells are still using IE7 behaviour.

Kinda stupid actually (If it's the case), it should behave the same way as normal IE8.

http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/1...des-in-ie8.aspx

It's not an API call, it's a registry key.

:facepalm:

Edit: Apparently you should also be able to do it by calling the CoInternetSetFeatureEnabled function with the FEATURE_NATIVE_DOCUMENT_MODE setting, but whether that works or not is a different matter.

Edit: That was for Beta 1, for Beta 2 it's FEATURE_BROWSER_EMULATION, and the key has changed, http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/08/2...ew.aspx#8903587

Actually, I don't think it's that complicated. I don't think it has anything to do with API calls or registry keys to change the IE8 trident rendering mode, but rather the other IE shells are just still not picking up the new IE8 trident engine. So they are still keep using windows/ie7/mshtml.dll instead of switching to windows/ie8/mshtml.dll thus they are still using the old IE7 trident instead of the new IE8 beta trident.

Unless they're packaging their own version, then they're using the system version (i.e. IE7, IE8, etc.)

well, IE8 beta installation doesn't overwrite IE7, so the IE7 mshtml.dll is still there, and you can change the browser mode to IE7 mode (not IE8 compatibility mode) with IE8b2's Developer Tools. I guess the other trident shell just don't want to switch to IE8 mshtml.dll because that means they have to implement the extra features of switching modes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!