Opinions on future pc build?


Recommended Posts

Just want some opinions on what you guys think of this possible pc build. I had another topic regarding the graphics card but it seems to have gotten deleted. Maybe somebody can suggest a better component than the ones I've chosen for a similar price. Here is the build. I'm thinking of placing the order on the 7th (today) so I would greatly appreciate some fast opinions.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/678854-opinions-on-future-pc-build/
Share on other sites

i would sac a little speed for quad core... it seems like on average the cpus with more cores are doing better.

never bought that mobo brand so i can't say much about the quality but specs look good.

everything else is good..

video card depends on what you plan to do with this...

and i would look into the case. doesn't seem to have much ventilation... but it's big and nice. so it should be good for the bigger mobo.

ECS sucks. By a MSI or Gigabyte motherboard

By a Western Digital hard drive

If you're not gonna overclock, get the Q6600. Get it anyways, even if you do want to over clock

Your power supply could be a lot better

What are you planning on doing with this PC?

If you can must about another $50-60 you can get a much better case (many CoolerMaster cases in the $55 range), power supply (check out the Corsair Value series), motherboard (you can get into a Gigabyte or MSI for another $10-15. I'd also recomend going eVGA with the video card just to keep the step up option. Someone else mentioned quad core and I'd suggest that if you don't upgrade often I would go quad core as well. A little more money now will save you a lot of money later.

Ok I update the list according to most of your recommendations so if you could give it another quick look at before I place the order I would really appreciate it. I have class in a bit so I'll check back around 4 hours.

And thanks so much for all of your input.

$10 more puts you in a much better monitor...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!