• 0

How do I use Outlook 2007 to filter certain e-mails to a folder?


Question

I can't seem to figure out how to properly setup Outlook 2007's rules to filter and move certain e-mails to a folder. For example, I created a folder with the name hotmail. I want Outlook to move any e-mails that have a "@hotmail.com" domain name to the hotmail folder. I thought I set it up correctly, but not all hotmail e-mails were moved to that folder so I think I did something wrong. Can someone here please post some detailed instructions on how to set this up? Thanks!

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Well if you're trying to filter based upon account (which is what it sounds like) it's actually very easy.

In the Account Settings window, click the email account you want to put in a specific folder, and then click the "Change Folder" button below.

  • 0
Well if you're trying to filter based upon account (which is what it sounds like) it's actually very easy.

In the Account Settings window, click the email account you want to put in a specific folder, and then click the "Change Folder" button below.

I don't think that will filter all incoming e-mails with the "Hotmail" domain into my newly created hotmail subfolder.

  • 0

So you want to filter based upon who they're sent from, not which account they're being sent to?

In that case, you would need to use Rules and Alerts, which it sounds like you're already fiddling with. I find the easiest way to filter by domain is to use the "with specific words in the sender's address" rule. Then just put the word you want (in this case, hotmail) and it should filter any domain that has the word hotmail in it. You can specifically do hotmail.com if you'd like, but it will work either way.

I find this method works better than using a domain with the "from people or distribution list" rule.

  • 0

right click your email and select 'create rule'

select 'advnaced options'

choose an option like 'where a specific word is in the senders address' - im using outlook 2000 at work right now, so it might be differnet on yours

click the 'specific words' link

type in 'hotmail'

select 'move to specified folder'

next next next, save save save, yadda yadda

any help?

  • 0
So you want to filter based upon who they're sent from, not which account they're being sent to?

In that case, you would need to use Rules and Alerts, which it sounds like you're already fiddling with. I find the easiest way to filter by domain is to use the "with specific words in the sender's address" rule. Then just put the word you want (in this case, hotmail) and it should filter any domain that has the word hotmail in it. You can specifically do hotmail.com if you'd like, but it will work either way.

I find this method works better than using a domain with the "from people or distribution list" rule.

Thanks to you and BGM for the advice, but wouldn't it be more appropriate to filter by domain name instead? Did I do something wrong with my initial rule? Not all e-mails sent from a hotmail account was moved to the hotmail folder. Some did and some weren't. I'm not sure why that was the case even though I checked and the sender's e-mail address does end with a hotmail.com.

  • 0

Were you using the "from people or distribution list" rule? That doesn't seem to work properly when it comes to domains, only specific email addresses.

Using the "specific words" rule is much more relaxed and allows a full text search of the sender's address. You can do hotmail.com, but it should work either way. If you were already using the "specific words" rule with hotmail.com and it's not working properly, I really don't know why it wouldn't be.

  • 0
Were you using the "from people or distribution list" rule? That doesn't seem to work properly when it comes to domains, only specific email addresses.

Yes. Are you saying that I shouldn't?

Using the "specific words" rule is much more relaxed and allows a full text search of the sender's address. You can do hotmail.com, but it should work either way. If you were already using the "specific words" rule with hotmail.com and it's not working properly, I really don't know why it wouldn't be.

So I should be using this instead?

  • 0

Yeah. I searched and searched wondering the same thing when I first started using Outlook 2007, and came to the conclusion that the "people or distribution list" rule simply doesn't work well for blanket domains.

I think it worked in 2003 though, so I'm not sure why they changed it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!