AMD Barton 2400+M running at 2.4 Ghz at 200MHZ FSB?


Recommended Posts

I put an old CPU and Motherboard system together to run as my media center and I wanted to see how far I could push the CPU. It started out at 1.8 Ghz at 133MHZ FSB and Windows showed it as the "weak link" as I got a 2.9 rating on my WEI on 7.

I pushed it up to 12x 200MHZ and it seems to be working well. Pushed the WEI to 3.9 and has been running HyperPI for 30 minutes @ Realtime with no issues. Is this a safe speed to keep it at? Should I clock it down a bit? I will be using it to rip my DVD collection to the HDD and recording TV from my cable company.

The original bartons were crackheads when it cam to overclocking, they were pretty much underclocked CPU's.

The mobile bartons are even better because they are mobile chips with less heat, so you could push them even further.

Ah, the famous "Barton" core. I had my 2500+ CPU overclocked to a 3200+ spec, on a ABIT NF7-S v2.0 - those were the days :D

It's a tried and tested overclock Frank (Y)

Radish?

Good News! This was previously in my main system before I went to Vista. Since my 3800+ MOBO wouldn't work with anything other then a crappy 300W PSU I dug this off of the back of the shelf and thought I would see what it could do. Previously I was only running it at 2.2GHZ at 166Mhz FSB. I took it up to 2.5Ghz at 166MHZ FSB but it started to error out. 2.4Ghz @ 200Mhz FSB seems to be the sweet spot at the default voltage (Y).

I have it installed i n a NZXT Duet case, the processor is sitting right next to a 120mm fan so I think it will be fine! Thanks for the input! I am still amazed that this setup with 1GB of RAM and a 6600GT runs amazing in Windows 7 and almost gets a 4 in the WEI index!

I got given a computer in 2004 with a 2500+ by my parents and when I recently accidently fried it due to the crap stock heatsink design, I brought another one and I love it to bits - nothing will ever beat IMO when it comes to easy overclocking, I even got it to 2.9 ghz once on stock cooling!

  • 2 months later...

I got my XP2500+ to 2.5Ghz on air with a 1.76-1.785v vcore at 12x210Mhz via modding the vcore lines and manually re-bridging the laser cut unlock multiplier on the CPU package. CPU temps were around 54C load.

My XP2500-M did a ridiculas 2.86Ghz on air (12x239Mhz @ 1.55v) and 3.025Ghz (12.5x242Mhz @ 1.79v) on water with Waterchill setup + mini pump in a modded Shuttle SN45G + 250w PSU. Load temps on air were around 65c and 48c on water. System went through two PSU's during an 8month lifetime before I went with an AMD 64 setup.

If your XP2400-M is on stock voltage or detecting it as normal desktop voltage (1.4v-1.45v) then you are doing the CPU no harm and will quite happily run for the forseable future.

  • 2 weeks later...

i had a 2500M+ many many years ago. i had that thing over 2.5GHz for a while. after a year or so, i got many BSODs. i had to lower the clock and voltage a bit... after several more months i had to lower again... finally the chip would barely run at 2GHz.

keep the voltage in a safe range and you should be fine.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
    • All it does is use the CPU more efficiently during boot to speed up boot times. That's it. Yawn....
    • It's not a one or the other kind of thing. Software should run efficiently, and the operating system should appropriately manage the CPU clocks. You could have the best most optimized software on earth, and it will still run faster if the CPU does a better job of boosting as needed. All this is doing is pre-boosting the CPU based on user actions, instead of waiting for the normal detection mechanism to kick in. If the OS knows it is about to need more CPU, why shouldn't it use that knowledge? It's the same idea of downshifting before passing someone, instead of just burying your foot into the peddle and waiting for the transmission to figure out what you want to do.
    • Audacity 3.7.8 by Razvan Serea Audacity is a free, open source digital audio editor and recording application. Edit your sounds using cut, copy, and paste features (with unlimited undo functionality), mix tracks, or apply effects to your recordings. The program also has a built-in amplitude-envelope editor, a customizable spectrogram mode, and a frequency-analysis window for audio-analysis applications. Built-in effects include bass boost, wah wah, and noise removal, and the program also supports VST plug-in effects. You can use Audacity to: Record live audio. Record computer playback on any Windows Vista or later machine. Convert tapes and records into digital recordings or CDs. Edit WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP2, MP3 or Ogg Vorbis sound files. AC3, M4A/M4R (AAC), WMA and other formats supported using optional libraries. Cut, copy, splice or mix sounds together. Numerous effects including change the speed or pitch of a recording. Write your own plug-in effects with Nyquist. And more! See the complete list of features. Audacity 3.7.8 changelog: #10688 Fixed an exception thrown when pasting into a newly-created track (Thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #10870, #10884, #10775, #10629 Fixed tone generation, waveform-scale setting, SetClip Name parameter, and clip-boundary command names for scripting and macros (Thank you, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #11106 Fixed the loading of presets for the Distortion effect (A million thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #10947 Fixed paste into an empty audio track not preserving the source sample rate (Thanks, Juan Gabriel Colonna (@juancolonna)!) #10776 Allowed AltGr modifier in label and clip name editing (Thanks, Davide Peressoni (@DPDmancul)!) #9938 Added options to choose where silence is truncated (start/middle/end) (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!) #9935 Added Podcast 2.0 chapters JSON export for label tracks (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!) #10103 Improve UI on HiDPI displays on Linux/wxGTK (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!) #10099 Fixed MixerBoard Mute and Solo button display (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!) #10681 Fixed multichannel FLAC import #10999 Fixed envelope being broken after joining clips Download: Audacity 64-bit | Standalone ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Audacity 32-bit | Standalone Download: Audacity ARM64 | Standalone View: Audacity Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!