Is it worth going 64bit


Recommended Posts

Using 64 bit OpenSuse here and everything runs great :) Everything is quick and I have had no problems yet.

I need some more RAM though, I have a virtual Server 2003 and Virtual XP running at the same time, with only 4GB of RAM. It still seems to be working ok but I think I should get some more :p

If your hardware supports it, go for it.

Does Flash work properly on 64-bit Linux now? Last time I used it (A while back, actually) nothing worked. I'd be really surprised if support has not been added yet.

If your hardware supports it, go for it.

Does Flash work properly on 64-bit Linux now? Last time I used it (A while back, actually) nothing worked. I'd be really surprised if support has not been added yet.

You can download the 64 bit Flash for linux yes.

It works in Ubuntu, just download and install :)

It works in OpenSuse. I installed flash from the repos and then installed Firefox and Opera and both worked without any additional 'tweaks' :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Is it worth going 64bit on Linux? I'm asking cause I'm curious since I just got myself a new system.

My distro of choice is Ubuntu by the way.

As someone that did, I would say heck yes unless you have issues with driver support for your hardware in 64-bit. (Drivers, are, in fact, the only reason I would recommend that someone with proper CPU support NOT install a 64-bit operating system, regardless of how little RAM they have.)

The biggest reason why I personally switched, and why I recommend that others do so, is stability (not future-proofing, or even access to large amounts of RAM).

It's not unique to 'buntu (especially since I installed Jaunty inside of Windows 7 64-bit), but actually pretty darn generic (all the more so since I switched 2 GB of RAM and six months ago).

While others have cited future-proofing and access to large amounts of RAM, what's wrong with extra stability compared to 32-bit? With all else (including RAM) being equal, comparing 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the same operating system, when it gets down to stability, 64-bit wins.

Arch is a rock solid 64 bit Distro, but the devs are strictly against multi-libs (32 bit app compatibility) which is why it is so solid. Stray from the path and you can get in a mess quickly.

I posted a thread a while back about 64 bit woes with Linux, seems the only way to maintain a clean 64 bit system is to have a separate chroot to run 32 bit apps in, a PITA since Wine is only 32 bit which is what is causing the most commotion.

Hence, if you don't use Wine, go for it. If you use Wine a lot, think carefully, Wine requires lots of 32 bit libs (sound, video, input etc.) and it's messy.

64 Linux linux is less stable than 32bit. It is less tester, making it less stable. Just take firefox for example, it is easier to crash it in 64bit than 32.

I have not found this to be the case. I've run Debian 5 Lenny x64 for almost 2 years and it has never crashed once. I use Firefox exclusively as a browser and never had any issues at all. Can you give a source for this data?

This article says exactly the opposite:

Using TuxRadar as an example, we know that 77% of our visitors run a 32-bit Linux distro, which is astonishing given that 64-bit Linux has been around for so long. All modern Intel chips support 64-bit out of the box - that's all Core 2 chips and all Core i7 chips, plus most Xeons and many Celerons. On AMD's side, all Athlon 64, Turion 64, Phenom and Phenom II chips also support 64-bit. But although Linux was first out of the door with support for these chips, early implementations were plagued with problems and extensive use of compatibility layers was needed to make things work.

No longer. Thanks to extensive testing and feedback from the community, 64-bit Linux is as stable as 32-bit Linux, so there's little reason not to use it unless you have a need for a specific, 32-bit only app. Even Wine happily supports 32-bit Windows apps such as Microsoft Office or Half-Life 2 running on a 64-bit Linux installation, and cross-platform mainstays such as VMware, VirtualBox and Java have already been ported.

http://www.tuxradar.com/content/ubuntu-904...-bit-benchmarks

On Linux you'll find that most applications will be build in x64 so it should work great. I'm not a Ubuntu user but I know that for the most part x64 Ubuntu isn't a bad distro. I currently have Slackware 12.2 compiled with a PAE kernel and OpenSuSE with a PAE Kernel (ATi Drivers won't work properly on x64 OpenSuSE).

  • 3 weeks later...
If your hardware supports it, go for it.

Does Flash work properly on 64-bit Linux now? Last time I used it (A while back, actually) nothing worked. I'd be really surprised if support has not been added yet.

I'm using the 64-bit flash plugin together with 64-bit Opera 10 beta 2 (build 4502), works fine here :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple, and worked on Microsoft Office for MacOS - and I have several Macs and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!