How much did OLD computers cost in 1996?


Recommended Posts

Put it this way the average laptop that costs around ?350 -?400 now would have cost more than ?1500 back then.

I remember that having 512mb of ram was a luxury in those days.

512mb would have been the hard dis;) ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

512mb would have been the hard disk. ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

Exactly most mobo's went upto 196 max.

Are we talking about old computers then, so anything prior to 1990 is old?

I purchased a Sinclair spectrum for ?4 in 1993 with floppy drive, from a boot market.

In 1996 time would do a computer windows 95 with all bells and whistles, 32mb r.a.m. cd rom and floppy + for free ?1,000 worth of software.

Total cost ?1,200.

In June 1993 I purchased the following system:

  • 486 DX 33 MHz
  • 8 MB RAM
  • 162 MB HDD
  • Oak VGA card with 0.5 MB graphics RAM
  • 14" CRT monitor
  • MS-DOS 6, Windows 3.1, Lotus SmartSuite bundled

for roughly 3000 DM, or about $2000 at the time. Mind you, this was a relatively low end system from a budget retailer (the older German users among us will still remember Escom).

Probably 2k for a computer like that, 486 with 8MB was pretty top line back then... although I can't remember when back then was, might've been before 1996. :s

512mb would have been the hard disk. ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

512MB would've been a pretty good hard disk :p, I had to stack a couple SCSIs to get to 512MB.

Like 486/66 MHZ, with only 8MB memory.

I forgot was it over $500-1000 on Average?

PCs were a lot more expensive back then.

I purchased an Acer 486DX2 with 16Mb RAM and a multimedia kit (cd-rom + sound card) for $2,500USD back in 1995.

NB: with time value of money taken into account, $2500 back then is like 5K+ nowadays. The purchasing power of $100 ten years ago was a lot more than $100 today.

In 1995 my family bought a 386/9mhz that had a 50mb hd and 4mb ram. Cost a little over $3k. I loved that computer...overclocked it to 25 mhz.

Sorry about that. In 95 we bought the compaq Pentium 200 with MMX. It had 256 mb of ram and a 500 mb HD. Had an 8x cd-rom. That was a top of the line then and I swear the tower looked like a space ship. This machine was a little over $2K. My parents were still using it until last summer.

The 386 was bought in August 1989.

As other people have said, most computers were over $1000 in 1996. I remember my family purchasing a new computer in April or May 1997 for about $2500 CDN... it was pretty high-end for the time. Sad that I remember the specs:

-Intel Pentium MMX 166MHz

-32Mb EDO RAM

-2Gb Western Digital IDE hard disk

-ATI 3D Xpression+ PC2TV 2Mb PCI video card (ATI Rage II chipset... one of the early and useless 3D cards)

-Creative Labs Sound Blaster AWE32 sound card

-AOpen 33.6kbps internal dial-up modem

-12X Panasonic CD-ROM (went through 2 of these in 2 weeks before the store realized they had a bad batch and replaced it with an AOpen 18X)

-3.5" 1.44mb floppy

-14" AcerView 34T monitor

-Windows 95 OSR2

I remember this computer as being ridiculously fast for about a year until games started supporting 3D accelerators. That ATI card claimed to be Direct3D compatible but never really worked with any Direct3D games.

Edited by hitman05

my first "family computer" was bought in 1993. it was a Packard Bell Pentium (90MHz) w/ an 800MB hd and 8MB ram. it had a monitor, so im just guessing it was upwards of $3k.

several years later we finally put a 32MB DIMM in it (total of 40MB!), an upgraded hd, and a 4MB PCI video card. Amazing.

i think we kept that machine for 6-7yrs.

We bought in 1997 a

166mhz P1 with MMX (haha)

32mb ram

3.2GB Hard drive.

32x CDrom (was a big thing back then)

15ins ADI CRT Monitor

Cost us around ?1400. Nowadays the average system is ?40:s:s

Around the same time, we bought a 200 MHz Pentium 1 (MMX) machine with 16 MB RAM, a 2.1 GB HDD and a 20x CD-ROM drive. Was between ?700 and ?900 (can't remember).

They were about the same costs as today's computers. Remember those computers were once the high end in the days.

My family bought an Osbourne pc running win 3.11. Can't remember the specs. My own first PC was a 500mhz CPU, 64mb RAM, 8GB HD running Win98. Got that back in 2000. 9 years later I have a PC 1000 times powerful than that. but cost is the same. I got that 98 computer for $1999. This computer (the second one I built) I have now costs me $2000 with a video card to come yet.

when people say computers are getting cheaper, they actually meant that old hard ware are getting cheaper, not new hardware.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!