Couple of simple overclocking questions


Recommended Posts

I'm fairly new to overclocking (have always tinkered with my gfx cards but never my CPU).

I have a x2 7750+ but unfortunately it's not a BE. (black edition with unlocked multiplier)

The only option I have for overclocking as far as I can see is the clock from 200mhz.

I cannot adjust multiplier or the voltage (which I didn't expect to be able to do).

For the last couple of days i've had it bumped up to 220mhz giving me just under 3ghz up from 2.7.

I've read about what safe temperatures are (i'm on stock cooling) but when viewing through hwmonitor i'm not sure which temperature I should be going off. I'm guessing the two chipset temps are for north/south bridges?

Thing is under the temp for the CPU is says 85c, which is worrying, but the temps for the two cores are at 17-23c and up to 30c under load. Is this what i'm supposed to be going off, or is it that my CPU is actually dangerously high, or that the temperature readings are not correct.

Also since this takes my ram up past 800mhz to 890mhz if I remember correctly is this ok? Can you slowely fry a CPU/RAM with constant heat or is the danger only really one overclock set much too high?

Cheers in advance.

Try CoreTemp. 30C under load is fantastic, if correct.

you cant change the voltages?

dont worry so much about frying anything. people always worry about this, but it's really hard to do unless you REALLY crank something up too far. if anything, you'll overheat and BSOD. no biggie, try again until it's stable.

i dont know anything about that cpu, so check out some AMD overclocking guides online.

Well it ran freaking sweet for 4 days, no problems what so ever, gaming etc every day.

Then last night when I turned it on it wouldn't even post, no lights at the front or anything, so I reset it with the jumper back to default and it works again.

Strange eh.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      212
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!