Is my PC really that old?


Recommended Posts

I've been happily getting along with the latest system I built, which I admit has been quite a while ago. However I still considered it a very fast system and was surprised when a friend of mine started making a big deal about how ancient it was and wondering why on earth I hadn't upgraded. So anyway, as I type this I'm running the following:

Intel Celeron 335 (Celeron D)

Prescott core, Socket 478

1GB DDR SDRAM

Geforce X1600

Windows XP SP3

My system is quite snappy and responsive, and everything I run works fine so I'm in no hurry to upgrade. Really though, would a Core 2 Duo really be that much faster, or is it just a pointless upgrade people do so they have the best? Personally I don't think I need it but I was wondering what everyone else thought.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/847830-is-my-pc-really-that-old/
Share on other sites

The hard drive is a Seagate 320GB SATA. Anyway as I said it feels fast enough to me, everything opens instantly and even HD videos play smoothly. When someone says ancient PC I always think of a Pentium Pro or 486. :laugh:

The only difference between the Celeron D 478 and Pentium 4 is the reduced cache, and at the time it was the best price/performance purchase available for me.

A modern Core 2 system is faster, but it's pretty meaningless unless you actually use the extra performance. I take it that you probably do not run many heavy applications or games, which means upgrading would just be a waste of money.

That was my thinking, I'm not so much into games anymore. Plus if I upgrade now it means basically a whole new PC since AGP, DDR1, etc have all been replaced. Too much money for far too little benefit I think. I'll probably add more RAM in the future and maybe even pick up a cheap P4 for a few bucks but for now I'm satisfied with it. :)

That was my thinking, I'm not so much into games anymore. Plus if I upgrade now it means basically a whole new PC since AGP, DDR1, etc have all been replaced. Too much money for far too little benefit I think. I'll probably add more RAM in the future and maybe even pick up a cheap P4 for a few bucks but for now I'm satisfied with it. :)

I think upgrading it would be a bigger waste of money unless you are getting the parts really cheap somewhere because old parts are usually overpriced.

yes, it's old.

Does it matter? Nope

When I was in the computer business I always told the customer that the age didn't matter. It's what you did with the machine that mattered.

It's like having a porche and never taking it out of first gear.

Who cares how fast it is if you don't use it to it's full potential. (which most people wouldn't)

Rule of thumb. If it does what you want it to and you're happy with the way it runs then why worry about it.

People that tell you that you need to upgrade are usually geeks and young kids who haven't lost their virginity yet.

yes, it's old.

Does it matter? Nope

When I was in the computer business I always told the customer that the age didn't matter. It's what you did with the machine that mattered.

It's like having a porche and never taking it out of first gear.

Who cares how fast it is if you don't use it to it's full potential. (which most people wouldn't)

Rule of thumb. If it does what you want it to and you're happy with the way it runs then why worry about it.

People that tell you that you need to upgrade are usually geeks and young kids who haven't lost their virginity yet.

that made me laugh XD

i am young and virgin

if that machine works for you, keep it as-is. no point in upgrading if you don't see any need for it.

i remember my old i845 box. 2.8GHz P4 800FSB running at 2.1GHz 400FSB, a 250GB hard drive, dual 60GB hard drives, (all 3 IDE) a DVD burner, 768MB memory, 128MB PCI video card, and dual 15 inch LCDs. ran XP like a dream at the time (about 11 months ago) but just got to the point where it was becoming sluggish and lacking under my ever-increasing demands. the time was right and i spent $250 on a dual-core TigerDirect kit computer, which became part of my current machine. which is still "low-end", but i like it the way it is :)

and don't let anyone put you down for having such low specs. seriously, if it's performance keeps you happy then thats all that matters!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • What they really need to do is automatically spell "loses" and "lose" correctly since nobody seems to know how to anymore. Then they blame spellcheck/autocomplete and don't realize autocomplete is just filling in the word for them automatically so it was misspelled in the first place.
    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Weechat. https://weechat.org/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!