Safe to take XP without any SPs online?


Recommended Posts

I have an old copy of Windows XP that I am about to install, it doesn't even have SP1 on it.

I remember hearing that it is very dangerous to take an outdated copy of XP online without protection, that it will become infected within moments without even surfing to a single website, is this true? Should I install antivirus and firewalls before connecting the system online? I remember hearing that sometimes XP needs to install some small updates before installing an SP, is this true, or can I install XP offline, then download SP3 from another PC and install that offline without any problems?

What method would you recommend I do? (Other than slipstreaming)

download sp3 offline install, put it on a disk or a usb drive or something. install xp without an internet connection, install sp3 after xp is done installing then take it online. It will take mere moments for xp to get infected

From what I found out SP3 won't install unless you have at least SP1a installed. So you will need to download SP1a or SP2 as well as SP3 to get it fully service packed. You can safely install the OS, it won't get compromised in a mater of minutes even if just sitting there online long as you are behind a firewall and don't browse anywhere. Just download the SP1a or SP2 and SP3 network installs on another PC and copy them over anyway you want to.

first thing i think... get the installers for SP1 and SP3 and install them. as far as i know, you can skip SP2. install them offline (burn to CD), then put on an antivirus program of choice. then get online and do Windows Updates. it will save you alot of time and keep the outdated system off the internet till it is at least somewhat up to date.

You won't ge infected sitting on an idle conenction can you?

If the network (may be directly to the Internet, or even any other local network) has any machine infected with worms, there is a high probability that you will get infected. Windows XP pre-SP2 doesn't even have the firewall on by default. If you turn the firewall on manually, you will be a bit more safer.

If the network (may be directly to the Internet, or even any other local network) has any machine infected with worms, there is a high probability that you will get infected. Windows XP pre-SP2 doesn't even have the firewall on by default. If you turn the firewall on manually, you will be a bit more safer.

Well if he has another machine on the local network that is infected that's a whole other issue. Point is if no machine on the local network is infected he's fine long as he doesn't really go anywhere, to be honest he could go to the Microsoft website on the XP non-SP install and grap the SP files that way as well and still be safe..

Can you install SP2 then 3?? Since SP1 / SP1a is a bit hard to find now (its no longer on the MS site - well the small file is, the network install isnt)). As someone has already said, you need SP1 or 2 (altho I dont know if SP2 works without SP1), before you install SP3

Can you install SP2 then 3?? Since SP1 / SP1a is a bit hard to find now (its no longer on the MS site - well the small file is, the network install isnt)). As someone has already said, you need SP1 or 2 (altho I dont know if SP2 works without SP1), before you install SP3

You can install SP2 without SP1 or SP1a being installed, then install SP3 after SP2 is installed.

The issue with XP pre-SP2 was that the firewall didn't activate at the same time as the network connection, so there was a delay between network-on and firewall-on. This left a window of opportunity for the IP scanning worms to get in.

If you have a NAT router or firewall (any off-the-shelf router will do), then you will be safe to connect and make a visit to Windows Update.

I don't know if it still applies now, but I don't think it's just a case of FUD.

When worms such as Blaster etc. were prevalent you could be infected without doing anything.

I remember once when I just reformatted as I was about to download SP2 immediately, bam, I received the Windows will shutdown in 60 seconds message.

But I believe if you have Windows Firewall enabled at the time when you configure your internet connection, you should be rather safe.

I know this is gonna sound dodgy.. But if you have a genuine licence key then download XP SP3 integrated version from somewhere and use your key. But again be very careful and make sure that the one you download/borrow is clean version.

I don't know if it still applies now, but I don't think it's just a case of FUD.

When worms such as Blaster etc. were prevalent you could be infected without doing anything.

I remember once when I just reformatted as I was about to download SP2 immediately, bam, I received the Windows will shutdown in 60 seconds message.

But I believe if you have Windows Firewall enabled at the time when you configure your internet connection, you should be rather safe.

To avoid the blaster issue- you could offline go into services.msc (typed at the run) look for the Remote Procedural Call - then under the properties set the do not reboot option upon errors- (that used to be the way before a fix was applied) to allow you to stay online without it booting you offline until you could get SP1. I used to have a XP Gold around here until I slipstreamed service pack 1. Also setting the do not reboot upon erros in the system tab. As well as turning on the windows firewall.

But personally I would not trust a XP machine unless it had Service Pack 2 installed ... or Service pack 1 with a decent firewall.

If you go on the normal sites like Yahoo!, Google, MSN, things that big you will be fine. Don't search for sites and click on links you don't know.

No you can't get a virus from having an idle computer running. That's BS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaster_%28computer_worm%29

get your facts straight buddy :rolleyes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaster_%28computer_worm%29

get your facts straight buddy :rolleyes:

Get your facts straight. How do you get a virus from websites that are perfectly safe (the big ones: Yahoo!, Google, MSN)? If you don't visit any website that is shady then you can run the system idle while running Windows Update to update your PC.

My comment "No you can't get a virus from having an idle computer running. That's BS.", was meant towards running the PC and updating it while connected to the internet. Not visiting thousands of websites that are shady and then leaving it idle.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
    • They said by this time everyone will have flying cars. WELL...
    • A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. Maybe not as we now know that time can flow backwards.
    • Of course. Simply reverse the polarity.
    • It is clear from this aricle that "Time Is On My Side" no matter which direction it is flowing., https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?i...m%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsEj8lUx0gwY
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!