Most Pirated Games of 2009


Recommended Posts

Source

As 2009 is slowly moving toward its end, we follow up our most pirated movies chart by taking a look at the most pirated games of the year. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is the absolute winner on the PC and Xbox 360, while New Super Mario Bros. scoops the title of most pirated Wii game of 2009.

With 4.1 million unauthorized downloads of the PC version alone, the game more than doubles the achievement of last year?s ?winner? Spore. Modern Warfare 2 leads both the PC and Xbox 360 lists, by a landslide. The overall trend across all platforms is that, unlike last year, all of the games are 2009 releases. What makes Modern Warfare 2?s chart-topping even more impressive is that this has been achieved after just two months of availability. We further see that the figures for the most downloaded titles have more than doubled compared to last year, equaling the growth in uTorrent users.

PC games are by far the most downloaded titles, with on average more than three times the number of downloads compared to Xbox 360 and Wii releases. As expected, Mario titles are in high demand on the Wii.

The data for these lists is collected by TorrentFreak from several sources, including reports from all public BitTorrent trackers. All the data is carefully checked and possible inaccuracies are systematically corrected.

post-34384-1262133006_thumb.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/860306-most-pirated-games-of-2009/
Share on other sites

Someone downloading a game doesn't equal a lost sale if they were NEVER GOING TO BUY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

I'm pretty sure developers/publishers don't see it your way either.

Don't get me wrong though, your point is perfectly valid if the people are already heavy 'torrent-ers'.

The reason that the CoD games are pirated so much is because the pricing is rediculously high, even on Steam CoD 4 is still ?29.99

IMO, if Activision get more realistic about pricing, piracy would drop.

Exactly! It's still $120NZD for the PC, which is a damn right rip-off!

The figures don't mean much.

Someone downloading a game doesn't equal a lost sale if they were NEVER GOING TO BUY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Exactly.

If you didn't buy it, you shouldn't play it.

Since there's no way to "try before you buy" with most pc games these days, meaning there's no demo released, no rentals (unlike console games), and a "no return policy" standard everywhere, then piracy is the only option.

Most games are total trash anyway, and I would be very ****ed if I had dropped $40-60 on a crap title and couldn't get my money back. Used to be it was no problem returning an opened title for a full cash refund, but piracy killed that for all of us.

The whole issue is really a catch-22 the way I see it. Crap games, high prices, and no return policies cause piracy, yet piracy causes crap games, high prices, and no return policies.

Not to mention these damn game studios either not supporting their titles, or using their paying customers as beta testers. Sometimes both.

Sometimes they even screw their customers outright. Horse Armor anyone?

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

I doubt that since most would want online play, or have the legal copy on their hands. I know many of people who wouldn't act as you said.

I doubt that since most would want online play, or have the legal copy on their hands. I know many of people who wouldn't act as you said.

The point is that those people do exist and as long as they do developers will do everything in their power to make-up for lost sales, e.g. Increasing the price.

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

If he was thinking about saving up for the game and didn't, then it's not a potential sale lost either. The majority of people who pirate would never have purchased the software/game to begin with. Game publishers in that regard can't complain about losing something they were never going to get to begin with.

If I decide not to purchase a game from a brick and mortar store because I think it's too expensive, and I don't download it either, is that lost sale counted in all those statistics as well? No it's not and everything will be lumped under the guise of "piracy" to justify why they aren't making the money they think they should be making.

Edited by iamwhoiam

And now Activision has the justification they need in order to neglect PC development even further. Perhaps I'm just paranoid, but I can't shake the feeling that Activision and IW neutered the PC version of MW2 on purpose, in order to stir the people into a frenzy and get them to pirate the game out of anger. Now for all future Activision titles, whenever they're asked why there's no PC version, they can just point to MW2 and and the fact that it was pirated to hell.

The Wii piracy surprised me though. I didn't realize there was any significant amount of piracy on that platform.

If he was thinking about saving up for the game and didn't, then it's not a potential sale lost either. The majority of people who pirate would never have purchased the software/game to begin with. Game publishers in that regard can't complain about losing something they were never going to get to begin with.

So that gives people the right to download/steal the game that the developer/publisher have pumped money into creating?

It's a shame to see such high figures for the PC, I'm not surprised developers cut corners when adapting games for PC.

And cutting corners is only a way to increase piracy, not deter it. As a half-assed pos port isn't worth paying full, or even half price for. So that train of thought would only 'hurt' devs more.

MW2 is a great example. It's on top cause they pretty much cut out the ability to have decent multiplayer(console kiddies may enjoy home servers run on shared 128kbps dsl since they have no choice, but i don't). Basically removing half the game. They cut corners and it cost them.

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

You just pointed out an excellent reason for pirating....if someone has to "save up for" a measly game, then there's a serious problem. When a game sells for $9.99 that was $49.99 just two years earlier, that tells me they are still making a profit on the $9.99 price and that greed accounted for the $40.00 hike two years earlier.

Then you also need to look at how they price vs. quality. More and more companies are basing their cost on the multi-player experience. For example, MW2 is very expensive. The single player main game can be completed in under 2 hours. If you don't like multi-player, you paid nearly $30 an hour for the game. Meanwhile, another game around the same cost (e.g., Dragon Age) provides hundreds of hours of single player gaming, making it cost about $0.50 an hour.

Now for all future Activision titles, whenever they're asked why there's no PC version, they can just point to MW2 and and the fact that it was pirated to hell.

Cutting out an entire market is a surefire way to make a business fail, especially in a terrible economy. If Activision is that stupid, so be it.

Another company will simply buy up what they can and the industry will move on as it always has. Just like Eidos and Looking Glass Studios and so many others before them.

i'm not surprised by the result, if activision wants more "lost sales" another price increase will help with their next game :rolleyes:

and if somehow possible make MP even worse and SP even shorter. :rolleyes:

then i'm sure all pc gamers will run to the shop to get it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!