RAM Troubleshooting suggestions


Recommended Posts

I just switched from 32-bit and installed Windows 7 64-bit, yes I know long over due but never had an issue with 32-bit until I was getting lag after years of usage and it wasn't using 1.2GB of RAM out of my 4GB.

(Yes yes, I know 4GB and 32-bit?! Just never bothered, for the reasons stated above.)

When I installed Windows 64-bit PC's been crashing lately (never crashed with 32-bit for more than three years), with different BSOD messages.

First instinct is to test RAM, and what do you know, only a few sections are faulty.

I have 2 x 1GB Corsair DDR2 CM2X1024-6400C4

and a

1 x 2GB Patriot PEP22G6400EL

I'm aware that it's usually not a good idea to mix RAM but I got extra RAM from a friend and it has worked for years with no problem with 32-bit.

As soon as I switched to 64-bit Windows 7 started crashing a lot. About 6 times in a span of 5 days.

Now here comes the part that completely threw me off.

Even though it showed a faulty section in the RAM (didn't say which stick).

I ran two passes of memtest on each stick individually and they all passed memtest

I was like, well, that was unexpected haha.

Before I do some more testing I'm thinking the following:

Faulty motherboard memory slot which would be a huge coincidence now that I installed 64-bit.

Is dust a possible cause? I moved the RAM around before the install, it's moderately dusty, can that affect the contact? (Random memory of blowing NES catridges came to me as I typed this :D )

Plausible: RAM timings? (Though doubtful since I haven't had a blue screen since the Windows ME days)

That's all I can think of ATM.

I'm looking for other possible causes and suggestions on what steps I should do to troubleshoot this.

For example: Should I test each RAM stick on each memory port of the motherboard?

Here's a screenshot of said crashes: BlueScreenView%20%20-%20%20CWindowsMinidump.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026262-ram-troubleshooting-suggestions/
Share on other sites

I would read your motherboard manual on what it says about RAM placement & pairing.

I would put the BIOS RAM settings on Auto, if they are not.

I would check the seating of the RAM, they can become off, when you tinker around inside.

Windows 7 also has a proggy to test the RAM.

I would test each stick individually.

Excess dust does not promote conductivity.

Even though it showed a faulty section in the RAM (didn't say which stick).

No part of your RAM should have errors.

Replace the faulty stick.

No part of your RAM should have errors.

Replace the faulty stick.

Did you read the second bolded sentence? I tested each stick individually twice, and they all passed the test each time. It only happens when they're used together.

Also, what is the difference between the Windows 7 memory diagnostics and memtest?

Here is another thing you can try before replacing Memory:

Control Panel/System Propeties/Advanced tab.

Performance/Settings.

Advanced tab.

Change the virtual memory to No paging file.

OK, OK, and Reboot.

This will clear out the Page Memory.

After rebooting, go in and change it to System managed size.

Reboot again.

I forgot this tip that I read on the Microsoft site.

Thanks for the interesting tidbit Hum and helpful suggestions! If I recall correctly I had already the BIOS at default but I did it again just in case. I brushed up my NES cartridge blowing skills (ran out of canned air) and made sure to reseat them very solidly.

Ran memtest again and it passed with flying colors! I also ran two passes of Windows memory diagnostics and also passed.

Previous evidence strongly suggests that the RAM was fine. The current tests I did after writing this post points me to believe that some RAM was either loose or not properly mounted or dust or a combination of the two since the first time I ran Memtest within the first two minutes I'd immediately get errors.

Remounting the RAM seems to have fixed the issue.

To be 100% sure I'll see how the PC runs now that every test I ran seems ok. If something does happen I'll come back.

If I do come back, my only question would be... actually I think I'll make a poll.

Here: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026286-how-many-memtest-passes-is-good-enough/#entry594317914

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to train them to help sort Adobe's old spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better against Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!