Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Any idea why my videocard is causing this effect?||
|Sony bins Music Unlimited, launches PlayStation Music 'with Spotify as exclusive partner'||
|Windows 10 Technical Preview||
|Windows Server 2012 r2 Remote Desktop Setup||
Posted 01 December 2011 - 13:04
Posted 01 December 2011 - 13:15
I'm paranoid with my data integrity, I want to minimize risk of bad sectors and the like as much as possible.
Simply put, I want all my data to be as bullet proof as possible at okay prices and not too many hoops.
It's a lot of data and I want it to scale over time.
We're talking about starting with 6-8ish TB of capacity before redundancy
RAID controller breaks -> what then?
Simply get a new one of the same type and dandy?
Posted 01 December 2011 - 18:56
Posted 01 December 2011 - 19:23
Posted 01 December 2011 - 20:25
as someone just mentioned, RAID is about redundancy - keeping your system running should a drive fail - a backup is still essential!
I read a bit about RAIDs and am scared that I get a faulty controller/it dies
Posted 01 December 2011 - 21:41
Posted 01 December 2011 - 22:01