Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|What are you listening to? (2014 Edition)||
|Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane'||
|Ring is a Kickstarter project that allows you to control everything with the wave of a finger.||
|Couple Trapped, Attacked By Their Own Cat||
|iOS 7.1 no longer shows full screen contact photos||
Posted 01 December 2011 - 13:04
Posted 01 December 2011 - 13:15
I'm paranoid with my data integrity, I want to minimize risk of bad sectors and the like as much as possible.
Simply put, I want all my data to be as bullet proof as possible at okay prices and not too many hoops.
It's a lot of data and I want it to scale over time.
We're talking about starting with 6-8ish TB of capacity before redundancy
RAID controller breaks -> what then?
Simply get a new one of the same type and dandy?
Posted 01 December 2011 - 18:56
Posted 01 December 2011 - 19:23
Posted 01 December 2011 - 20:25
as someone just mentioned, RAID is about redundancy - keeping your system running should a drive fail - a backup is still essential!
I read a bit about RAIDs and am scared that I get a faulty controller/it dies
Posted 01 December 2011 - 21:41
Posted 01 December 2011 - 22:01