Recommended Posts

KDE Plasma Workspaces, Applications and Platform 4.8 Improve User Experience

KDE is delighted to announce its latest set of releases, providing major updates to KDE Plasma Workspaces, KDE Applications, and the KDE Platform. Version 4.8 provides many new features, and improved stability and performance.

KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.8 Gain Adaptive Power Management

Highlights for Plasma Workspaces include Kwin optimizations, the redesign of power management, and integration with Activities. The first QtQuick-based Plasma widgets have entered the default installation of Plasma Desktop, with more to follow in future releases. Read the complete Plasma Workspaces Announcement.

KDE Applications 4.8 Offer Faster, More Scalable File Management

KDE applications released today include Dolphin with its new display engine, new Kate features and improvements, Gwenview with functional and visual improvements. KDE Telepathy reaches first beta milestone. Marble's new features keep arriving, among which are: Elevation Profile, satellite tracking and Krunner integration. Read the complete 'KDE Applications Announcement'.

KDE Platform 4.8 Enhances Interoperability, Introduces Touch-Friendly Components

KDE Platform provides the foundation for KDE software. KDE software is more stable than ever before. In addition to stability improvements and bugfixes, Platform 4.8 provides better tools for building fluid and touch-friendly user interfaces, integrates with other systems' password saving mechanisms and lays the base for more powerful interaction with other people using the new KDE Telepathy framework. For full details, read the KDE Platform 4.8 release announcement.

Source: KDE website

Download information: KDE SC 4.8.0 Info Page

Screenshot:

plasma-desktop-4.8.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1054021-kde-sc-48-released/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I cannot see why people "like" KDE. Too bulky and clunky for me.

To me its UI looks professional and its feature set is impressive. It sometimes get a bit too messy and it lacks a cohesive and organized approach to some parts of the settings and management of the desktop environment (it's called a DE, right? Sorry for any linux geeks If I got that wrong). But all in all it has its place in the linux world with its different goal in doing things than gnome. I also think it's slightly more familiar to windows users than gnome (but it could be only me).

To me its UI looks professional and its feature set is impressive. It sometimes get a bit too messy and it lacks a cohesive and organized approach to some parts of the settings and management of the desktop environment (it's called a DE, right? Sorry for any linux geeks If I got that wrong). But all in all it has its place in the linux world with its different goal in doing things than gnome. I also think it's slightly more familiar to windows users than gnome (but it could be only me).

It's not just you. Where Gnome has taken cues from Mac OS, KDE has taken several cues from Windows. For funzies, while Gnome users acknowledge that it takes cues from Mac OS, KDE users get a sandstorm in their gender-appropriate crevices whenever anyone points at something added to KDE just a few months after the same element was added to a version of Windows.

I'm in the flustercuck camp, myself, when it comes to KDE. Everything strikes me as bubbly and gaudy and lacks a cohesive design language. KDE feels like somebody ran one of those disgusting custom-GUI, shun-all-native-controls, wifi configuration or anti-virus applications and thought that kind of intentional inconsistency was a great idea. The above screenshot is the closest I've seen to an improvement in years, and only because there's so much gray everywhere it all just sort of blurs together and you don't register the skin anymore.

But that's cheating.

It's not just you. Where Gnome has taken cues from Mac OS, KDE has taken several cues from Windows. For funzies, while Gnome users acknowledge that it takes cues from Mac OS, KDE users get a sandstorm in their gender-appropriate crevices whenever anyone points at something added to KDE just a few months after the same element was added to a version of Windows.

I'm in the flustercuck camp, myself, when it comes to KDE. Everything strikes me as bubbly and gaudy and lacks a cohesive design language. KDE feels like somebody ran one of those disgusting custom-GUI, shun-all-native-controls, wifi configuration or anti-virus applications and thought that kind of intentional inconsistency was a great idea. The above screenshot is the closest I've seen to an improvement in years, and only because there's so much gray everywhere it all just sort of blurs together and you don't register the skin anymore.

But that's cheating.

Umm.... Wrong. Windows took cues from KDE. Mac took cues from Gnome.

It's not just you. Where Gnome has taken cues from Mac OS, KDE has taken several cues from Windows. For funzies, while Gnome users acknowledge that it takes cues from Mac OS, KDE users get a sandstorm in their gender-appropriate crevices whenever anyone points at something added to KDE just a few months after the same element was added to a version of Windows.

I'm in the flustercuck camp, myself, when it comes to KDE. Everything strikes me as bubbly and gaudy and lacks a cohesive design language. KDE feels like somebody ran one of those disgusting custom-GUI, shun-all-native-controls, wifi configuration or anti-virus applications and thought that kind of intentional inconsistency was a great idea. The above screenshot is the closest I've seen to an improvement in years, and only because there's so much gray everywhere it all just sort of blurs together and you don't register the skin anymore.

But that's cheating.

So you are saying it looks too inconsistent, but the grey skin looks too consistent? :rofl: One thing to note is the default theme is very customization via color schemes. There are many color schemes to choose from by default that are less "grey", and you can download more as well.

I actually just gave 4.8 a try today on my arch install. I had never liked kde in the past, mainly do to buginess and performance issues and I am actually pretty impressed with 4.8. Its extremely fast and responsive on my laptop, even more so than gnome 3 which ran pretty well too. I'm getting 17 seconds boot time to a usable desktop, apps are all opening fast, and kwin effects are super smooth for once. Best of all plasma no longer crashes if I so much as look at it wrong :0

The best thing so far for me is dolphin. Its so much better than nautilus in every single way, and a lot faster. The new layout engine it got in 4.8 has some really nice eye candy and is screaming fast.

I also really like that there is finally an option in system settings to disable nepomuk. I very rarely search for files so have little use for it. If I do search for files I use FSrunner (krunner plugin)

There are still issues with the look in feel, the gui can indeed be weird/convoluted in certain places but its improved.

I'm on KDE 4.8. I already have explained my conversion from Unity to KDE. I'm not hardcore and never have been.

But I had my desktop set to display, well, my desktop folders. I have to remind it now every time I log on to get it to treat my desktop as a place where you can have files.

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? :)

Mac OS X is NeXTStep with a modified UI. NeXT had a beta with a shelf (dock on steroids) in the works around the time they were bought by Apple. This is where the OS X UI draws its inspiration from. Certainly not GNOME 1.x.

OPENSTEP.beta-Desktop.jpg

I think Windows 3.1 looked better than this. KDE looks absolutely awful. I keep thinking they'll come to their senses and revamp the UI, but it doesn't look like it's gonna happen. Are there at least other themes that look more professional?

Gnome was released in 1997. The current Mac interface came about in the early 2000s. Some of Mac's interface was "borrowed" from NeXTStep.

You're still delusional. Things like the Menu Bar go all the way back to the original Mac OS released in 1984. Nothing was "borrowed" from NeXTSTEP, Steve Jobs developed it in 1989 and sold it to Apple in early 1997 following an announcement in late 1996. NeXTSTEP was then turned into Mac OS X.

You really have no point whatsoever. In fact the only thing you proofed here is that GNOME is much younger than both Mac OS and NeXTSTEP are. You should also keep in mind that early GNOME looked nothing like Mac OS/NeXTSTEP. They didn't start copying stuff until recent years.

Maybe I have my facts wrong when it comes to Gnome and Mac. Was never a Mac fan boi, so it isn't important to me. So many OSes "borrow" from each other all the time, it's hard to keep track of who "stole" what and when.

So I will concede the point.

Maybe I have my facts wrong when it comes to Gnome and Mac. Was never a Mac fan boi, so it isn't important to me. So many OSes "borrow" from each other all the time, it's hard to keep track of who "stole" what and when.

So I will concede the point.

I would love to know what Windows copied from KDE..

I loved KDE until 4. The way it changed is too much for me. I switched to LXDE though and haven't looked back. Also, did anyone see the article about Canonical dropping funding from Kubuntu?

Agreed. I went to Gnome and then Xfce. MATE and Cinnamon look good also. Will give those a try soon.

Maybe I have my facts wrong when it comes to Gnome and Mac. Was never a Mac fan boi, so it isn't important to me. So many OSes "borrow" from each other all the time, it's hard to keep track of who "stole" what and when.

So I will concede the point.

So why exactly did you bring it up in the first place?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!