Cheapest and best hardware for a hackintosh


Recommended Posts

I am really looking for hone my mac skills and really learn the lion and lion server. I own a mac mini with lion server and I want to really learn how to create an open directory, connect to domain, etc...

So, I am thinking of trying to pick up rather cheaply a couple of computers that can handle either snow leopard or lion...non server. What would be the best hardware for this....a laptop or desktop? Is that dell mini 10 still available somewhere?

I could do vmware but that takes up resources. I'd rather have a physical separate computer.

If it's just for learning purposes why would you go through all that trouble? A virtualized environment is more than enough in your case. In any case I'd give it a shot, if it really does't suit you you can always choose to buy a dedicated computer for it.

I'm confused though... You say you already own a Mac mini, why do you need a second "Mac"? :/ If you don't want to fiddle around with your existing installation simply install a second OS X Lion copy on an external HDD.

+1 for vmware. it's very easy and vmware player is free and it may work.

even purchasing vmware workstation is cheaper then buying a dedicated system for it. workstation runs around 200 USD.... building a hackintosh ready system is around 800-1500 for a decent system.

If it's just for learning purposes why would you go through all that trouble? A virtualized environment is more than enough in your case. In any case I'd give it a shot, if it really does't suit you you can always choose to buy a dedicated computer for it.

I'm confused though... You say you already own a Mac mini, why do you need a second "Mac"? :/

Here is my reasoning for it, I just finished setting up the mini is in the following:

1. One login for a media server

2. One login for a small consulting business and remote support

3. One login for general computing

I have the dns and all of the network settings configured already. So I was looking for a couple of physical computers that can be played with so those settings can be matched to the server. The problem with using vmware on the server is that it is tasked with other uses already and I am not sure I want to do that.

I knew someone would ask that. The mac mini specs:

core i7 2.7 ghz

8 gb ram

500 gb hd

airport extreme router connected to comcast at 25/5

8 port managed switch

should be enough to run a couple basic instances. might be slow.... but not recommended, doable, but would be a little slow if you wanted to be heavy with the usage. however it's really easy to manage.not very many hassles and you can snapshot the OSes and everything with vmware workstation.

should be enough to run a couple basic instances. might be slow.... but not recommended, doable, but would be a little slow if you wanted to be heavy with the usage. however it's really easy to manage.not very many hassles and you can snapshot the OSes and everything with vmware workstation.

Remember that workstation is for windows and linux. For os x, it is vmware fusion. If I go that route I am really thinking of maxing out to 16gb ram and at least 1tb hd. That should go better for a vm route.

Remember that workstation is for windows and linux. For os x, it is vmware fusion. If I go that route I am really thinking of maxing out to 16gb ram and at least 1tb hd. That should go better for a vm route.

vmware fusion is 50 bucks. not too bad of a price ;-) that plus the hardware would be around 200-400.

I built a machine back in 2008 with the following specs: Gigabyte G31M-S2L board with 4gb RAM, Intel Core2Quad Q6600 and at the time it had an old ATI X1900 graphics card. Today the same box has an ATI 4670 graphics card, 4 new hard drives and runs Mac OS X Lion 10.7.3. I didn't use any of the custom installers that many hackintoshers use, I installed from the App Store copy of Lion I bought when this machine ran 10.6.8. This hardware works great as a hackintosh, and with my bootloader mods it doesn't require any mods or hacks to the OS at all, its all native Apple and updates without issue from Software Update.

If I were building a machine today, I would definitely always go Intel.. thats a must for good hackintosh setup. Also I recommend Gigabyte boards they are generally more compatible and only require very minor DSDT tweaks (part of the bootloader) to allow the OS to see all your hardware correctly. For graphics you can go either ATI or Nvidia though personally Im an ATI man. But ATI cards can be harder to get working on OS X, depending on the model you get.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!