35 replies to this topic

[Muhammad Farrukh]

Director:
Tony Gilroy

Writers:
Tony Gilroy (screenplay), Dan Gilroy (screenplay)

Stars:
Jeremy Renner, Rachel Weisz and Edward Norton

Quote

A story centered on a new CIA operative in the universe based on Robert Ludlum's novels.

[svmpatel]

Hmm... Bourne without the Bourne... Interesting twist.

[Shaun]

I quite like Jeremy Renner since I saw him in "The Town"

[Muhammad Farrukh]

He was awesome in 'The Hurt Locker' too

[SHoTTa35]

Looks pretty good though even though i'm kinda upset (just a little) about no Jason Bourne. I'll definitely watch it though as it looks pretty action packed, just how I like my movies

[virtorio]

Ed Norton. That's one way to revitalize my interest in a movie.

[monkey13]

virtorio, on 10 February 2012 - 14:29, said:

Ed Norton. That's one way to revitalize my interest in a movie.

Rachel Weisz for me.

[Vykranth]

A bit surprised about the actors choices. Funny how Edward Norton has a leaning towards shady characters.
It is still bizarre to me that the Bourne continues without Jason Bourne and Matt Damon.

Still, when one thinks about it, Robert Ludlum wrote only three Bournes but Eric van Lustbader, who took over Ludlum, has already wrote 6 more Bournes. I just hope that Bournes are not going to become like James Bonds.

[ThePitt]

hmm no

[Hell-In-A-Handbasket]

Vykranth, on 10 February 2012 - 15:20, said:

A bit surprised about the actors choices. Funny how Edward Norton has a leaning towards shady characters.
It is still bizarre to me that the Bourne continues without Jason Bourne and Matt Damon.

Meh, Jason Bourne is the American James Bond, its a CodeName, not a person?

Dont really seem interested in it atm, might be cause they exposed it and seemed over,, yet seems now back with ssame names and people

[Teebor]

svmpatel, on 10 February 2012 - 12:47, said:

Hmm... Bourne without the Bourne... Interesting twist.

I know what would be an interesting twist, a hollywood film that isn't an attempt to cash in on an existing title, or a remake, or a reboot, or whatever they decide to come up with next as an excuse.

<sigh> I suspect I will watch it though, but I'm not going to the cinema thats for sure

[Snafu]

So has this new guy gone rogue or he is still working for the CIA?

Would be awesome to have this guy and Matt Damon in the next movie. The Bourne Collision?

[+Perfect72]

Meh. Jeremy Renner is okay, but I've always felt he was a better supporter, than a star in a film. SWAT was decent. Just not sure how I feel about him taking over, never really liked him all that much.

[tiagosilva29]

Rachel Weisz and Edward Norton having steamy spy sex?

[arachnoid]

Looks like parts of it are recreations of the origional but the actual character is after treadstone