Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



[Windows 7 SP1 x64] 16GB R.A.M.


17 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 leesmithg

    The Major!

  • 8,898 posts
  • Joined: 11-August 04
  • Location: Kings Hill, West Malling, Kent, England.

Posted 13 February 2012 - 14:54

My mobo supports 16GB r.a.m. (15.7 usable).

So I installed 16GB r.a.m. (15.7 usable).

All the same make all configured correctly.

However, I donated my last system to my son, that is exactly the same OPS and has exactly the same start-up items.

It has 4GB r.a.m. and feels quicker and boots quicker.

Anyone have an idea why 16GB r.a.m. (15.7 usable). is slower than 4GB (all usable)?

Thanks in advance for suggestions.


#2 Semtex

    Resident Fanatic

  • 502 posts
  • Joined: 20-February 11
  • Location: Europa/Poland

Posted 13 February 2012 - 14:55

It is more about Your HDD then RAM in that case....

#3 zeke009

    yeap...

  • 1,213 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 04
  • Location: MN
  • OS: Win8 Pro x64
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920 (AT&T)

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:01

Semtex has a good point. Can you post the HDD info and whether you're using a SATA II or III drive?

#4 +Jdawg683

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 11,358 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 03
  • Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:02

yep. hard drive

#5 Joe USer

    Lazy Joe's

  • 379 posts
  • Joined: 29-May 07
  • Location: East Coast USA

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:03

View PostSemtex, on 13 February 2012 - 14:55, said:

It is more about Your HDD then RAM in that case....

Exactly. I'm betting there's a 16GB hibernate file and a 16GB pagefile in play.

#6 Astra.Xtreme

    Electrical Engineer

  • 5,924 posts
  • Joined: 02-January 04
  • Location: Milwaukee, WI

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:05

View Postzeke009, on 13 February 2012 - 15:01, said:

Semtex has a good point. Can you post the HDD info and whether you're using a SATA II or III drive?

If he has a regular mechanical HDD, SATA II or III won't matter at all. But yeah, depending on the brand of HDD, some will be definitely faster than others.
As for boot time, that's not too much of a concern. Some BIOS will fly right through all the checks really quickly, and some will take there dear time. You could go into the BIOS and make sure "Quick Boot" is enabled, and there there aren't any diagnostic timers that are sucking up a few seconds.

#7 daniel_rh

    Resident Elite

  • 1,368 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 05
  • Location: Venezuela
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy SIII

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:07

Yep, the hard drive could be the problem, look how many RPM the drive has, 7200RPM would be nice, 5400rpm is way too slow, if you get a SSD would be perfect- The loading times is affected by many things like drivers and software installed, hard drive speed...

#8 LogicalApex

    Software Engineer

  • 4,996 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 02
  • Location: Philadelphia, PA
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
  • Phone: Nexus 4

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:09

Your question makes very little sense... You're asking why two separate machines used by two different people "feel different"... Maybe it is because you both have different usage patterns?

For starters, what does "feel faster" even mean? What programs do you both have starting up? Etc...

My desktop feels fast. It has 24GB of RAM and a regular old magnetic HDD in RAID 5 that it boots from. It obviously boots slower than an SSD based system, but feels just as snappy in day to day usage. You have to do more to explain your problem if you're hoping for a real solution.

#9 Mark

    (: ollǝɥ

  • 3,468 posts
  • Joined: 22-October 04
  • Location: Derbyshire, UK

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:11

There's also obviously start processes, are you running anything you don't need at startup? If it's a standard HDD, maybe defrag it and if you're only using a single HDD for all your storage, partition it so that you can reduce fragmentation between apps and data.

#10 Joe USer

    Lazy Joe's

  • 379 posts
  • Joined: 29-May 07
  • Location: East Coast USA

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:11

Just for fun, you can turn off virtual memory and hibernate and see if there's any difference.

I wouldn't recommend doing it long term, but I bet you'll see an improvement.

#11 Mark

    (: ollǝɥ

  • 3,468 posts
  • Joined: 22-October 04
  • Location: Derbyshire, UK

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:19

I'd set something low for the pagefile, like 2GB, I only have 8GB of RAM and never have any issues. I say this because anything more would be wasted space, it's unlikely you'll run out of RAM with 16GB

#12 Semtex

    Resident Fanatic

  • 502 posts
  • Joined: 20-February 11
  • Location: Europa/Poland

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:31

For 8GB RAM I've 1024 MB min. and 1024 max. SWAP, moved to other SSD, working perfect...
I don't use hibernation (with SSD this have no sense IMO) ....

#13 medium_pimpin

    Boner Soup

  • 2,998 posts
  • Joined: 22-February 06
  • Location: Lexington, KY USA
  • OS: Windows 7/Linux Mint

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:32

Same CPU?

#14 vetneufuse

    Neowinian Super Cool

  • 15,079 posts
  • Joined: 16-February 04

Posted 13 February 2012 - 15:33

Your hard drive controller comes down to play a huge part in this, and ontop of that the hard drive itself.

#15 OP leesmithg

    The Major!

  • 8,898 posts
  • Joined: 11-August 04
  • Location: Kings Hill, West Malling, Kent, England.

Posted 13 February 2012 - 17:21

Hard Drive Info:

Name, Value
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 ATA Device
Disks: C:, D:, E:, F:, G:, H:, I:, J:
Model: Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 ATA Device
Firmware Revision: JC4OA3MA
Serial Number: XXX930HXXXXX
Device Type: IDE-device, hard drive
ATA Version: SATA-2

CPU same clock speed 2 extra cores.

Name, Value
CPU Properties
Physical Processors: 1
Logical Processors: 4
Name: AMD Phenom™ II X4 840 Processor
Description: AMD64 Family 16 Model 5 Stepping 3
Manufacturer: AuthenticAMD
Frequency: 3200 MHz
External Clock Frequency: 200 MHz
Processor ID: 17XXXXXX - XXXXXXX
Cache Properties
L1 Instruction Cache: 64 KB
L1 Data Cache: 64 KB
L2 Cache: 512 KB
Extended Details
Architecture: x64
Stepping: 3
Number of Cores: 4
APIC ID: 0
Address Width: 64 bit
Data Width: 64 bit
Socket Designation: AM3R2