[Windows 7 SP1 x64] 16GB R.A.M.


Recommended Posts

My mobo supports 16GB r.a.m. (15.7 usable).

So I installed 16GB r.a.m. (15.7 usable).

All the same make all configured correctly.

However, I donated my last system to my son, that is exactly the same OPS and has exactly the same start-up items.

It has 4GB r.a.m. and feels quicker and boots quicker.

Anyone have an idea why 16GB r.a.m. (15.7 usable). is slower than 4GB (all usable)?

Thanks in advance for suggestions.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057812-windows-7-sp1-x64-16gb-ram/
Share on other sites

Semtex has a good point. Can you post the HDD info and whether you're using a SATA II or III drive?

If he has a regular mechanical HDD, SATA II or III won't matter at all. But yeah, depending on the brand of HDD, some will be definitely faster than others.

As for boot time, that's not too much of a concern. Some BIOS will fly right through all the checks really quickly, and some will take there dear time. You could go into the BIOS and make sure "Quick Boot" is enabled, and there there aren't any diagnostic timers that are sucking up a few seconds.

Yep, the hard drive could be the problem, look how many RPM the drive has, 7200RPM would be nice, 5400rpm is way too slow, if you get a SSD would be perfect- The loading times is affected by many things like drivers and software installed, hard drive speed...

Your question makes very little sense... You're asking why two separate machines used by two different people "feel different"... Maybe it is because you both have different usage patterns?

For starters, what does "feel faster" even mean? What programs do you both have starting up? Etc...

My desktop feels fast. It has 24GB of RAM and a regular old magnetic HDD in RAID 5 that it boots from. It obviously boots slower than an SSD based system, but feels just as snappy in day to day usage. You have to do more to explain your problem if you're hoping for a real solution.

Hard Drive Info:

Name, Value

Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 ATA Device

Disks: C:, D:, E:, F:, G:, H:, I:, J:

Model: Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 ATA Device

Firmware Revision: JC4OA3MA

Serial Number: XXX930HXXXXX

Device Type: IDE-device, hard drive

ATA Version: SATA-2

CPU same clock speed 2 extra cores.

Name, Value

CPU Properties

Physical Processors: 1

Logical Processors: 4

Name: AMD Phenom II X4 840 Processor

Description: AMD64 Family 16 Model 5 Stepping 3

Manufacturer: AuthenticAMD

Frequency: 3200 MHz

External Clock Frequency: 200 MHz

Processor ID: 17XXXXXX - XXXXXXX

Cache Properties

L1 Instruction Cache: 64 KB

L1 Data Cache: 64 KB

L2 Cache: 512 KB

Extended Details

Architecture: x64

Stepping: 3

Number of Cores: 4

APIC ID: 0

Address Width: 64 bit

Data Width: 64 bit

Socket Designation: AM3R2

Hi,Using 4 memory slots instead of 2 makes your system run at 2T which causes that you loose 2% to %5 performance maybe that,s your problem cause i asume your using 4 sticks,

2 sticks feels snappier but loading times on games are faster with more ram and about boot times maybe your have many programs loading on startup,"msconfig" is your friend. :)

  • 2 weeks later...

On Windows 7:

Open the Control Panel, click on "Action Center", click on "View Performance Information" on the left panel, click "Advanced Tools" on the left panel, and finally click "View Performance details in Event Log".

That will show you any performance degrading issues with software / drivers / etc that will make two seemingly identical machines feel quite different.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!