Chrome only future for Flash on Linux

By +Frank B.
in Linux

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

ichi

Posted
Posted

We are talking about browsers here.

Then I don't understand what I quoted above about removing flash on smartphones not being a problem :huh:

If not using Chrome and Flash, how will you be able to enjoy embedded music and movies on the web?

If you were in dire need, and for whatever reason didn't want to use Chrome, and also for whatever reason you didn't want to use Chromium, and also for whatever reason the old Flash plugin (which Adobe will still be supporting for some years, just not releasing new versions) stopped working... in such extreme scenario, you still could run your Windows browser of choice on Wine with the Windows version of the Flash plugin.

Years ago I had to play an online flash based MMORPG running Firefox on Wine because back then the Linux plugin was some major versions behind. Other than the windows styled widgets not matching the aesthetics of my Linux desktop it all worked perfectly fine.

Grand Master

.Neo

Posted
Posted
Adobe Flash is a media plug-in that plays a variety of media formats and games - without Adobe Flash, you are left with a less functional browser.

Flash is by no means the only way of watching media content or even the most important one. Flash is becoming less and less important with every passing day.

Mentor

ArialBlue

Posted
Posted

Flash is by no means the only way of watching media content or even the most important one. Flash is becoming less and less important with every passing day.

How else can you watch h264 videos and listen to MP3s on a Desktop Linux?

Grand Master

Gerowen

Posted
Posted

To be totally honest, there's not a lot of websites that I visit that require the use of Flash. More and more web-sites are using HTML5 or other comparable technologies to provide rich content without the need for 3rd party plugins. And this isn't a sales pitch for HTML5, I seriously don't visit that many websites that use flash.

Grand Master

ichi

Posted
Posted

How else can you watch h264 videos and listen to MP3s on a Desktop Linux?

With any of the available media players: mplayer, totem, kaffeine, vlc, amarok, clementine, banshee, audacious... they all play any media format you can play on windows.

The two programs I mentioned above, Minitube and Musictube, are playing the h.264 video streams straight from Youtube bypassing flash entirely.

Exception to this is mobile Linux OS which are built with media in mind (more optimized for media and can take full advantage of the hardware's media capabilities), but then again they are not relevant to this topic.

Care to elaborate how a mobile Linux OS is more optimized for media than a desktop Linux OS? Only thing that comes to mind would be h.264 hardware acceleration, and that's available as well on desktop Linux.

Mentor

ArialBlue

Posted
Posted

There are H.264 and MP3 players for Linux...

With any of the available media players: mplayer, totem, kaffeine, vlc, amarok, clementine, banshee, audacious... they all play any media format you can play on windows.

The two programs I mentioned above, Minitube and Musictube, are playing the h.264 video streams straight from Youtube bypassing flash entirely.

Care to elaborate how a mobile Linux OS is more optimized for media than a desktop Linux OS? Only thing that comes to mind would be h.264 hardware acceleration, and that's available as well on desktop Linux.

Is Flash the only way play those formats on OS X and Windows? No. Well, the same goes for Linux.

You are intentionally confusing browsers with media players.

Grand Master

ichi

Posted
Posted

You are intentionally confusing browsers with media players.

I think you are intentionally mixing both in an attempt to make a point. You asked how you could play h.264 and mp3 on desktop Linux without flash, and we gave you an answer.

Just in case you didn't know, media players such as mplayer or gstreamer also provide browser plugins to play embedded content, so we are still talking about browsers if that's what you want to talk about.

Let's put it this way: you have the same media capabilities on Linux as you have on Windows.

And then, as I pointed above, even in the hypothetical situation that some vital browser plugin became completely unavailable on Linux and there was no native working alternative, you could still resort to running a Windows browser with Wine with whatever Windows plugin you need.

Community Regular

singularity87

Posted
Posted

Adobe is still a commercial company and if it turns out that the resources put into keeping Flash on Linux alive isn't worth its while it will get axed. That's what I think happened here.

I can run Safari in 64-bit while using 32-bit plugins. Why won't other browsers go the same route?

I think that's a feature of OS X that 32-bit and 64-bit play so nicely, not so much on Windows and Linux.

Grand Master

ichi

Posted
Posted

I think that's a feature of OS X that 32-bit and 64-bit play so nicely, not so much on Windows and Linux.

I haven't tried myself since I run 32bits Linux, but AFAIK you can run 32 bits NPAPI plugins on 64 bits browsers using nspluginwrapper. Maybe it's not as nice as in OSX, I don't know, but it should work anyway.

  • singularity87
  • Like 1
Grand Master

.Neo

Posted
Posted

You are intentionally confusing browsers with media players.

You asked a question about how else (besides a browser) to play movies and mp3s on Linux. You got your answer.

My Mac supports Flash perfectly, does that mean I use Safari to watch movies and play music with? No.

Grand Master

The_Decryptor Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I think that's a feature of OS X that 32-bit and 64-bit play so nicely, not so much on Windows and Linux.

It's the "Fat Binaries", where you can put 32 and 64bit code within the same file, and then load either version when you want it.

Linux and Windows on the other hand can't do that, you need separate binaries for each architecture, so in the Firefox case you'd need both 32bit and 64bit versions (When an official one exists) installed to be able to run 32bit plugins with a 64bit host (or 64bit plugins with a 32bit host)

Rising Star

@Leo

Posted
Posted

Microsoft DTV-DVD cannot play H.264 outside of the Bluray/HDDVD spec, which is perfectly inside of the H.264 spec. If you would have watched more than Apple trailers, you'd know.

And another moron to fall for the "MKV=Piracy" bull****. I guess all my rips for personal use are also piracy. Oh wait, you are probably from the US. -.-

Community Regular

singularity87

Posted
Posted

I haven't tried myself since I run 32bits Linux, but AFAIK you can run 32 bits NPAPI plugins on 64 bits browsers using nspluginwrapper. Maybe it's not as nice as in OSX, I don't know, but it should work anyway.

I remember that now. I think I'm thinking of some weird OS X kernel arrangements - 64-bit apps on a 32-bit kernel. Don't know if Safari could use nspluginwrapper (or indeed any browser not on Linux)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Rockstar gives last-gen GTA V players free upgrades tomorrow

      By +Random Stranger · Posted

      I don’t get why if I bought the game on the last get I needed to pay $40 to upgrade to the new version in the first place and people who love the game and play a lot would have upgraded already so this is just PR and a chance to grab new players who forgot the game long time ago I think
    • Nearly half of American adults now use AI, but concerns are also growing

      By tradesetter · Posted

      The term "use" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that headline. "Use" can mean opening ChatGPT occasionally to ask for the definition of a word or information about a specific topic. If you frame the question around how many people use it as a daily driver in their work or personal lives, that number is a lot smaller. Those are the people who pay for AI. Nearly everyone else is happy to use it for free, but doesn't see enough value in it to pay for it.
    • This 4K webcam from Acer is now only $59.99

      By wrack · Posted

      No support for Windows Hello!
    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts

      By [deXter] · Posted

      I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models

      By LoneWolfSL · Posted

      Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!