Unlimited mobile data, is it really needed? (UK based)


Recommended Posts

Debating whether to change my HTC One X pre-order from Orange over to Three to get unlimited data for the next 2 years.

I have a feeling streaming services are going to boom and the current ?10 price tag for music services for mobiles should come down.

Differences in contracts are

Orange

600 mins

Unlimited Texts

1GB Data

Free HTC Media Link from Dialaphone

Free monthly sub to Deezer, music streaming service

?28.50 p/m

?59.99 for phone (I have quidco cashback at ?65, but will have to wait on it)

Three

500 mins

5000 texts (basically unlimited for me)

Unlimited data

?29 p/m

Free phone

Orange is good in that I have a music service to use for 'free', but it's through Orange swappables and I have no idea if they'll keep swappables or Deezer around for 2 years.

What other sort of stuff will I benefit from having unlimited data with on a mobile? Tethering? TVCatchup? Podcasts? Videos? Any specific apps?

Im on O2 900 with my iPhone 4. That came with no data and had to buy a bolt on for ?6 for 500mb.

I really wish i never upgraded from my 3g as i was on a better contract, cheaper, and had unlimited data. (lost my phone so decided to upgrade).

They've recently changed their iPhone tarriffs to now have 1gb data as standard and i cannot up or downgrade without losing a loyalty discount i have.

As soon as my contract is up i am switching to a provider that offers me unlimited data.

I have jailbroken my iPhone so i'd like to watch freeview through tvcatchup.com when im on the train and i also stream skygo through my phone and through an app called SkyFire (which is a web browser app like Safari but can play embedded videos). At the moment cause of the data limit i only do this when i'm connected to Wifi.

In two weeks i've already used 300mb and thats from light use; emails, facebook, twitter and whatsapp.

Also, if i had unlimited data, i would use my phone to tether to my laptop if i didn't have a wireless access point.

Only down side is that 3 dont have very good coverage and haven't had so for the past few years and that seems to be peoples main gripe with 3.

I mostly use my phone as a phone, and for Twitter/browsing, and I listen to about 2 hours of streaming music (through Spotify) each day, although that's done from home and might be using my home network. I'm not really sure, it seems kind of random what does and what doesn't use WiFi when available. Either way I'm day 26 out of my 30 day billing cycle and I've used 862MB of data. I'm on an unlimited plan currently and aside from the first month or so when I was downloading a lot of apps I've never gone over 1GB of data.

I use Orange in Austria and I only pay 7.50 euro per month for 1000 calls/txt's and unlimited data (shaped after 1 gb) but I don't think I have ever gone over it. But still it's nice to not be charged if I do.

In regards to Three's coverage it honestly depends on where you live. Three are fantastic here, i get a full signal in my house, where as o2 and Orange struggle to get one bar here unless you go outside.

You will also not find a better network for mobile internet, i'm able to get 7mbps download speeds over 3g at work (hspa+) and I usually get around 4mbps at home.

I dont think coverage will be a problem, maybe get a free pay and go sim and see how three are in your area if its a concern? I would personally go for the deal on Three, its a much better network in my opinion, especially for data.

As for data intensive apps besides tethering i use Dropbox to upload / download stuff to my phone (photos / video), streaming internet radio, BBC iplayer and TV Catchup. That totals a couple of gigs a month for me, i would expect that to rise within the net couple of years as apps become more data intensive.

In regards to Three's coverage it honestly depends on where you live. Three are fantastic here, i get a full signal in my house, where as o2 and Orange struggle to get one bar here unless you go outside.

My brother struggled to get a signal in Wakefield, and the other weekend I was in Manchester and a friend couldn't get a signal (we were next door to the Trafford Centre), while I had a full signal (on vodafone).

Will this be your first smartphone with a data plan?

I used my Desire on GiffGaff for last year and a half with unlimited data. Can't really say I ever done anything intensive, but this phone has much more powerful hardware (HD screen for example), and streaming services really are starting to kick off.

It really depends. I have an iPhone on an unlimited (or so so) and never really go above 2GB a month and I use online radio and YouTube then the casual apps.

You'd only need unlimited if you do heavy video watching and streaming regularly.

Look in to buying your phone sim-free then going on Giffgaff, yes it costs you more upfront but it saves hundreds later on :D

Not really. The HTC One X is around ?460+ sim free, nearer ?480+ I think most places. GiffGaff at ?10 for 2 years is ?240. ?480 + 240 is ?720.

?29 x 24 is ?696.

It has all the pluses of not being tied in and what not, but I don't really fancy paying ?480 up front right now.

I am in the US, and have Verizon. They got rid of unlimited data, but luckily I had the unlimited data plan on my previous phone, so I'm grandfathered in to the plan. I now have a Galaxy Nexus, and I just eat through unlimited data. Before on my Droid Incredible, I would use 1-2 GB a month, but with the Galaxy Nexus, I've been averaging 5-6 GB a month. 4G is really fast, so I see no point being connected to WiFi when I'm at work or at home. Ultimately it depends on your use case, but I tether a lot, watch many youtube videos, stream music (through slacker, pandora), browse, etc.

I used my Desire on GiffGaff for last year and a half with unlimited data.

Have you checked the phone or with GiffGaff as to how much data you used per month? It'll provide a baseline at least. For example, if you discover that you've only been using 100-200MB/month up to now, then an upgrade to 1GB should be plenty. If you've been using 600-700MB, then the Orange plan won't suffice.

Not really. The HTC One X is around ?460+ sim free, nearer ?480+ I think most places. GiffGaff at ?10 for 2 years is ?240. ?480 + 240 is ?720.

?29 x 24 is ?696.

It has all the pluses of not being tied in and what not, but I don't really fancy paying ?480 up front right now.

For most phones it does work out cheaper by quite a bit, also your unlocked phone is worth more than one shackled to a network.

Think about how often you have access to WiFi. Most pubs, trains, train stations etc have WiFi. You probably have WiFi at home. Will you actually use a lot of data when you don't have access to WiFi? If not then 1GB is probably enough.

Other things to think about are which will have the better coverage for you. Three have the best 3G network in the UK from what I understand, as they're a 3G-only network. Their 2G services piggyback off Orange's network. Three are also the only company in the UK that have a HSPA+ network - if this is available near you I'd say it's a no brainer.

For most phones it does work out cheaper by quite a bit, also your unlocked phone is worth more than one shackled to a network.

Phone will be unlocked :)

Good advice all round everyone, I'm going to go for unlimited data and stay safe knowing over the next 2 years I won't have to think about downloads/streaming.

Yeah I would go with the unlimited option if possible. I use WiFi at home wherever possible and still was going over 750meg on my previous contract. It's now been upped to 1GB but as you say with all the streaming etc it will soon get used up.

without using any interweb videos I consume about 2gigs a month. I has "unlimited" data, also. But as the cheapskates add very little to infrastructure, and continue to oversell... if your provider isn't too unlike verizon you can expect similar abysmal performance as everywhere else but with possibly less fee gouging for not-unlimited

Not a fan of HTC, though: led colors are weak in Light Flow

I was a naysayer of unlimited internet as I never really found a use for it. That was until I found myself in a hotel where wifi wasn't free and I was going to miss the F1. It's always good to have it even if you don't know how you'll use it yet.

I do believe on Three, they allow tethering on their unlimited contracts too, so no legal problems.

Coverage wise... Here's my experience.

Vodafone 3G was the worst of the lot. Not far ahead was O2 3G - both REALLY poor compared to the other networks.

Three: Pretty much 3G everywhere. Problem was deep in buildings I'd lose signal completely.

Orange - not actually tried them, however I often roam onto it on my iPad:

TMobile: I've taken my iPad 2 with me just about everywhere and I've always had a 3G, medium to strong, signal. About 75% of the time it's a standard T-Mobile signal, the rest it'll show T-Mobile-Orange (i.e. the Orange network). I'm assuming the opposite is true for Orange customers so they'll be able to use the TMob 3G signal too.

I think about my internet use when these topics come up and immediately I think something along the lines of "I've gone through at least six gigs today alone." But then, I realize that it's on my computer. I hardly use my phone for internet unless I'm in need of directions while driving. For topics like these, you need to observe your internet usage and decide whether or not you sincerely need the extra data. My current phone plan is 300m Talk, Unlimited Text and Data for $25/month and despite having unlimited data, I hardly come close to reaching the 2GB throttle limit unless I'm torrenting on the go or I need to tether while on a road trip. It all really depends on your preference and your data usage.

I was a naysayer of unlimited internet as I never really found a use for it. That was until I found myself in a hotel where wifi wasn't free and I was going to miss the F1. It's always good to have it even if you don't know how you'll use it yet.

I do believe on Three, they allow tethering on their unlimited contracts too, so no legal problems.

Coverage wise... Here's my experience.

Vodafone 3G was the worst of the lot. Not far ahead was O2 3G - both REALLY poor compared to the other networks.

Three: Pretty much 3G everywhere. Problem was deep in buildings I'd lose signal completely.

Orange - not actually tried them, however I often roam onto it on my iPad:

TMobile: I've taken my iPad 2 with me just about everywhere and I've always had a 3G, medium to strong, signal. About 75% of the time it's a standard T-Mobile signal, the rest it'll show T-Mobile-Orange (i.e. the Orange network). I'm assuming the opposite is true for Orange customers so they'll be able to use the TMob 3G signal too.

Yeah me and the other half end up in hotels a few times throughout the year.

I've got myself on Three's One Plan for ?25 a month for two years - This is the only plan that 'legally' allows tethering with them. My phone cost me ?117.99 upfront, but that contract price is very attractive for what it offers, and if I decide to sell the phone and upgrade myself one year in, I'm not stuck with some ?30+ p/m contract eating into my budget for a new phone.

I also think when it comes to upgrading, being at ?25 is going to be good for haggling with Three.

The other day I started using Google Music, I'm uploading all my songs to the cloud (20,000 songs is a great allowance for me) - Working great so far, and this will definitely be something that's going to eat away at a monthly allowance if I had one. I know you can cache songs to your phone, and I will do that for aeroplane journeys for example, but I'll stream the rest of the time.

I'll be using pockcasts for podcast streaming, always hated using iTunes to download all the podcasts, then sync them to my phone (especially as I use Android).

TVCatchup, BBC iPlayer and Love Film on the video front for me also.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      404
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!