Recommended Posts

I have a local network setup using a standard 192.168.1.x range. there's no domain involved. there is no hardware firewall involved - only an unmanaged switch.

there are 4 machines on this subnet - Win7, Synology NAS, Server 2008 R2, Server 2003

i have 2 shared folders on the NAS which can be accessed easily by the Win7 and Server 2003 machines, but not by the R2 machine. fwiw, the R2 machine can access shares on both the Win7 and 2003 machines, just not the NAS.

When i try to map a network drive (a shared folder on the NAS) through Windows Explorer on the R2 box, i type in the appropriate creds, and about 10 seconds later, the credentials box pops up again (over and over.) If i try to use cmd to map the drive, i get "System error 58 has occurred. The specified server cannot perform the requested operation." Also, Synology has a product called the Synology Assistant. Within this program, i can [try to] map a drive using their wizard. This results in the same Error 58. I've contacted Synology support, and they were unable to rectify the issue.

Again, the win7 and 2003 boxes can access the shared folders on the NAS. The 2008 R2 box cannot.

After searching the internet for a fix, nothing has worked for me. I've tried uninstalling MSE, numerous Group Policy settings, numerous registry tweaks. i've also disabled the windows firewall and tried various tweaks to the network adapter's properties. nothing has worked.

I'm not sure where else to go w/ this.

no problems there typing in the computername\userid and password? if that is the case just use that to auth with.

i cant use the method you described. the NAS has no idea about the server's local users - only the users assigned in the NAS itself. (plus, i've tried that already) :p

you fail to understand what I am talking about....let me try to explain better...

device type : network name

server : server1

nas : storage

On the server you have no user passwords a user called owner and on the nas you have a user called user1 and a password of password.

when on server 1 and logged on with the user called owner and you want to access a share on the nas you open a run prompt and type in the following

\\storage\share1

now it prompts you for a username and password you type in:

storage\user1

password

--------------------

You can see in this example I am not using the user on the server for any type of authentication.

I have no clue what you have named your nas box so you will need to go into the network properties of your nas box to find out what it is called if you didn't rename it.

and what you described does not work. i continually get prompted to enter my credentials for the NAS. again, the NAS logs that the authentication was successful; however, windows just constantly re-prompts for the creds. if i do the same thing you mentioned in CMD, using "net use" i get the Error 58.

this same thing does NOT happen on the win7 or 2003 machines.

Thanks sc302. i've already tried that, but it didnt help either :s i had it set to ?Send LM & NTLM responses - use NTLMv2..." and it didnt work. i switched to ?Send LM & NTLM responses? and that didnt work either.

server 2008 isn't liking something, and there isn't much we can do further at this level. perhaps getting a network sniff and seeing what is transpiring on the network layer can lead to a more definitive cause if you are infact authing to the nas box and are getting logs stating that you have been granted access but continue to get access denied.

if it is group policy you can see what gp changes have been made by running rsop.msc at a run prompt you will be able to drill down through anything that has a policy change. if nothing is listed there are no policy changes (local or through a dc).

And what account are you running with on the 2k8 box? I do not believe I have ever seen that error before. But sounds more like the account your using does not have the ability to map

When you keep getting prompted -- are you trying to map it, or just browse it? Sounds like mapping to me

"When i try to map a network drive"

Vs trying to map -- just access it

run, \\nasname -- put in your creds, do you get access now?

if it is group policy you can see what gp changes have been made by running rsop.msc at a run prompt you will be able to drill down through anything that has a policy change. if nothing is listed there are no policy changes (local or through a dc).

let me look into that this morning. thanks!

And what account are you running with on the 2k8 box? I do not believe I have ever seen that error before. But sounds more like the account your using does not have the ability to map

When you keep getting prompted -- are you trying to map it, or just browse it? Sounds like mapping to me

"When i try to map a network drive"

Vs trying to map -- just access it

run, \\nasname -- put in your creds, do you get access now?

I've tried 3 different windows user logins - all of them in the local Admin group.

i get constantly prompted for my creds whether i try to browse (start, run) or map the drive in Explorer.

So when i try to map a drive in CMD, i get the Error Code 58 message. This same error code occurs in the Synology Assistant.

post-34502-0-45056500-1334580863.jpg

post-34502-0-32521400-1334580858.jpg

Again, you do not use windows logins....you will never auth with windows logins. You might as well try logging in with the user name of jesus and the password I am god, it will yield the same results.

You need to login with a user that was created on the nas or the nas admin user. You may have to use the nas computer name (which you have not mentioned what it was) in the auth method with the nas admin user name.

I feel bad because 2 years ago when I was a network administration student we had the same issue when we were building our end projects for class. I have a billion (and one) documents stored from all the stuff me and the other guy (who was the top of the class with me) and we DID figure out how to fix it, it's just after graduation I never got a job in the field (very little up here in South Dakota, and my wife did not want to move) so a lot of the stuff I've forgotten. I can't even remember where I stored all of the crap we read to try to fix the issue. ?Send LM & NTLM responses - use NTLMv2..." does sound VERY familiar though. If I remember right, those older NAS systems do not play well and there is some policy you need to change dealing with that. I feel horrible, it's on the tip of my damn tongue but I just can't spit it out... Lemme keep rolling it around my head for awhile and I'll try to get back to you.

Again, you do not use windows logins....you will never auth with windows logins. You might as well try logging in with the user name of jesus and the password I am god, it will yield the same results.

You need to login with a user that was created on the nas or the nas admin user. You may have to use the nas computer name (which you have not mentioned what it was) in the auth method with the nas admin user name.

again, im not using the windows login to try to access the NAS. Budman asked about the windows user i was trying, implying that it's a group policy issue.

just a quick summary, as i still believe this is a GP issue, but i simply cant narrow it down.

  • i cannot access a shared folder on the NAS from Server 2008 R2
  • i can access the shared folder on the NAS from Server 2003 and Windows 7
  • i can access folders shared on either Server 2003 or Windows 7 from 2008 R2
  • The shared folder on the NAS uses an account local to the NAS - not tied to any specific computer, server, or domain
  • there is no domain involved at all

and thanks to all that have been helping me so far :beer:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!