Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|resharper alt + enter fix in visual studio 2013||
|Ford Taurus Oil Change Warning||
|DirecTV equipment somehow eating 70Gb per day.||
|What do you drive?||
|used nokia lumia 920, worth it?||
Posted 13 April 2012 - 00:43
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:15
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:35
Posted 14 April 2012 - 12:24
Posted 17 April 2012 - 00:37
Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:21
Nope, higher frequency means nothing these days, unless you compare two processors from the same series and generation. Ex: Core i7 2600 (3.4 GHz) vs. Core i7 2700K (3.5 GHz). Your statement wouldn't stand true if you compared something like a Pentium 4 3.8 GHz vs. a Core i7 2700K. The i7 2700K will run circles around the P4.
I am going to assume the Atholn is better cause of the higher GHZ but I need to make for sure as now days things have changed so much.
Posted 17 April 2012 - 22:28