Why Do You Need an Amp?


Recommended Posts

Why is it advisable to purchase an amplifier?

Does it actually improve / change the sound to movies and games?

My girlfriends dad has one and his sounds are great, really deep bass but not overpowering. I have a 5.1 system plugged in to a PC (just plain old motherboard connectors) but it was on the low end market, a Creative iTrigue 5600.

So I plug some wires from the PC into the amp, then the wires go from there to the speakers? Not sure I would want to buy a cheaper one (?100-?200) but then I can't really afford to buy a ?600 / ?700 one.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1070657-why-do-you-need-an-amp/
Share on other sites

PC connectors are generally different to the audio connections on an amplifier. PC sound systems are usually only the speakers and a sub-woofer, not an amp.

Yeah,

Can't say as I've ever seen an amp hooked to a computer, although anything is possible. Don't know why anyone would want to hook an amp to a computer really either?

A good Amp will need good speakers to make use of its full potential and vice versa for good speakers. Sound quality is highly subjective beyond certain price point. So if you are satisfied by the motherboard sound sound, don't bother spending. It's an endless expense pit when it comes to the hobby of being an Audiophile.

Yeah,

Can't say as I've ever seen an amp hooked to a computer, although anything is possible. Don't know why anyone would want to hook an amp to a computer really either?

Amp as in a stereo amp or A/V unit not a guitar amp. Reason you do it is for sound quality. A pair of half decent bookshelf speakers sounds better than most PC equipment. There are also plenty of sound cards on the market with connectors for all kinds of amplifiers, the Asus Xonar Essence range is pretty good and not too expensive either.

A good Amp will need good speakers to make use of its full potential and vice versa for good speakers. Sound quality is highly subjective beyond certain price point. So if you are satisfied by the motherboard sound sound, don't bother spending. It's an endless expense pit when it comes to the hobby of being an Audiophile.

There's some truth in that...

But it seems his desire for better quality is already there and he has heard the difference, so it's lost...

Also, in before cooky lol

Glassed Silver:mac

I don't think I've ever seen this setup before, i.e. PC sound system connected to an amplifier?!

If you want nice sound to be produced from your PC (particularly for movies and gaming), just make sure you have a good quality set of surround sound speakers such as the Logitech offerings and couple that with a good dedicated sound card; such as the Creative X-Fi or Asus Xonar ones :D

I hook up my MBA via an amp for 5.1 and boy does it make a difference, the sound on the MBA is quite tinny but via the amp sounds amazing. Even live TV from the net comes through as 5.1 although I think it may be stereo just pumped to the rear speakers as well.

For me worth every penny for the sounds alone. Mine was about ?6/700 but also makes life easier for switching between PS3/Xbox/TV/Mac

The quality comes from the DAC (Digital to analogue converter) ;)

Absolutely.

Why is it advisable to purchase an amplifier?

...

For your purposes it might be better to get a quality sound card and use your existing speakers. Otherwise, you could spend a bit more and do digital out to a quality speaker system.

Yes, that's correct; for your purposes the right surround sound speakers and possibly a quality sound card (if you can justify/afford this expense) would do the trick!

A dedicated sound card really enhances the gaming experience even through the use of traditional headphones :D

I also have my PS3 hooked up through a Yamaha receiver/amplifier via HDMI and Optical for the audio, but the PC is a totally different ballgame...

If you want better quality sound from your computer, buy better speakers and a good dedicated sound card.

You don't need an amp, computer IS the amp.....

You'd only need any amp if your using standard speakers that don't plug directly into your computer.

Even if you plug a $5000 amp into your computer, it's not gonna magically make your **** sound better on your same speakers. It's still getting the same signal from your sound card. You just need to get good computer speakers unless your wanting the home cinema kinda deal.

You don't need an amp, computer IS the amp.....

I'm confused by this entire thread... yes, some computers have a class T amplifier in them, but most sound cards generate enough power to only drive an amplifier or headphones. The amplifier is built into the speakers (somewhere, usually in the subwoofer if it has one). Otherwise, you're limited to those 3-5 watt laptop type speakers.

So, you're going to use an amplifier either way. The real question is, what happens to the signal on its way from it's digital origin to your ears. If you want a better amplifier, you can buy a home A/V one, but in reality depending on what you listen to (compressed music / movies) and your sound card (on the motherboard?), it probably won't sound any different.

The real advantage of home audio amplifiers is that they're usually bigger, and can drive speakers with more power as they have more room to vent, which means you get clearer sound at higher volumes. Also, you can get a huge upgrade in sound by getting a better subwoofer... usually PC ones are designed to go "boom boom boom" to make shotguns sound better in games... they're not often well mixed with the other speakers, which can make them overbearing in movies.

I've never used PC speakers. Even when I had Amigas I had then connected to my hifi system. At the most basic level you just need any amp that has an input. My old hifi didn't have a AUX input so I used the CD player one as I was playing the CDs from the PC.

Currently my PC is connected to a home cinema receiver driving a pair of bookshelf speakers. I game and watch movies on this too, but it's primarily for music so 2.0 is good enough for me. My room isn't laid out properly to get the full advantage of 5.1 anyway.

If you have a home cinema receiver then you have the option of using digital output on your PC. This means that your crappy onboard soundcard will output the same ones and zeroes to the amp as a high end dedicated one. If you don't have a receiver you should be able to pick up a used one pretty cheap (especially if it's a non-HDMI one). Then just get some proper (i.e. non-computer) speakers.

I have an Onkyo amp/receiver connected to my laptop using HDMI cable. The amp feeds the 5.1 speakers.

If you can do this type of setup, use a movie player like VLC/PotPlayer X64 which can perform bitstream / audio passthrough over HDMI. This way your amp does the job of decoding the pure audio signal (DTS/DTS:HD MA/AC3/DD) and you get the best sound quality your speakers are capable of.

I notice substantial audio quality improvement while doing a bitstream / audio passthrough.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!