Discussion for AMD CPU/APU owners


Recommended Posts

I thought I'd create a topic for people who have an FX-series CPU to talk about what you like about the CPU, what you hate about it and what you are expecting from next generations.

From performance wise I couldn't be happier with mine, haven't clocked it and probably won't as I've yet to see what can cripple this CPU. I mostly game with it, deal with video/photo editing :)

Altho there's one thing, the stock cooler that came with it, it's loud as hell when the CPU gets some work on it, hopefully next time they'll ship a better cooler with it (or maybe its just me don't know :) )

Anyway shoot ahead. :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071853-discussion-for-amd-cpuapu-owners/
Share on other sites

So far my favorite thing about my FX 6 core is its ability to multitask. I have yet run into any real performance hits while running multiple applications outside of accidentally running two games simultaneously (which are both graphically demanding).

I really want to try and overclock it but I'm completely alien to it and I'd rather keep it working than risk fudging it up. The only issue I have had with it so far is the mobo firmware problem for Shogun 2. But now that I have a workaround for it the thing runs like a dream. Handles everything I throw at it and more and never hits too high a temperature.

So far my favorite thing about my FX 6 core is its ability to multitask. I have yet run into any real performance hits while running multiple applications outside of accidentally running two games simultaneously (which are both graphically demanding).

I really want to try and overclock it but I'm completely alien to it and I'd rather keep it working than risk fudging it up. The only issue I have had with it so far is the mobo firmware problem for Shogun 2. But now that I have a workaround for it the thing runs like a dream. Handles everything I throw at it and more and never hits too high a temperature.

You can try AMD Overdrive for clocking, in most cases it gives you a stable clock and will do it for you :)

I wonder if consumers who purchased an FX cpu were a bit clueless about what kind of computer they were building. I don't ask to be sarcastic but there was a lot of willful ignorance on how fast it really was.

Please do enlighten us :)

I wonder if consumers who purchased an FX cpu were a bit clueless about what kind of computer they were building. I don't ask to be sarcastic but there was a lot of willful ignorance on how fast it really was.

Yep. My Sandy Bridge from over a year ago absolutely blows it out of the water... the i7-3770K Ivy Bridge I have right now just furthers the blow :p

Yep. My Sandy Bridge from over a year ago absolutely blows it out of the water... the i7-3770K Ivy Bridge I have right now just furthers the blow :p

Eh, my Ferrari is faster than my VW bug, doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the bug, and it was a lot cheaper.

I'd still get an FX over a Intel processor right now, they're dirt cheap by comparison, and for gaming, they're good enough.

Can a moderator maybe keep an eye out for this topic and delete all kinds of "bashing" and/or mine is better then yours posts as this is meant for people who actually have an FX CPU and want to talk along :)

Yep. My Sandy Bridge from over a year ago absolutely blows it out of the water... the i7-3770K Ivy Bridge I have right now just furthers the blow :p

Intel CPU's are great for single, high power applications. But the multitasking power of my AMD is amazing. Its like comparing a Ferrari to an F350. Can you haul 350lbs of luggage, your entire family and the dogs in your Ferrari? While the Ferrari will win in a race, they still have similar power and similar ability to perform.

Not everything is about benchmarks and stress tests. Sometimes its about fulfilling a role. If all you want is for BF3 to run at 60fps on Ultra then by all means get an i7. But if you want to run Photoshop + Illustrator or Premier Pro + After Effects then I'd bet my money an FX will perform better.

PS: Speaking of stress tests and benchmarks. My current setup can run the Unigine benchmark at max settings at an average of 22fps. I think for a budget gaming rig that's pretty darn good.

For those who think their iwhatever is great, that's great. You should feel good about what you bought, or you shouldn't have bought it. However, http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-6100+Six-Core

So, please, go home and love what you have. I don't really want to hear about what you think your i-3/5/7 can do that you think my FX can't, because plain and simply, my FX can do it all. Oh yeah, and I can keep some of the money for that needlessly expensive mobo/cpu in my pocket.

Good day to you sir.

I SAID GOOD DAY!

  • Like 2

Intel CPU's are great for single, high power applications. But the multitasking power of my AMD is amazing. Its like comparing a Ferrari to an F350. Can you haul 350lbs of luggage, your entire family and the dogs in your Ferrari? While the Ferrari will win in a race, they still have similar power and similar ability to perform.

Not everything is about benchmarks and stress tests. Sometimes its about fulfilling a role. If all you want is for BF3 to run at 60fps on Ultra then by all means get an i7. But if you want to run Photoshop + Illustrator or Premier Pro + After Effects then I'd bet my money an FX will perform better.

PS: Speaking of stress tests and benchmarks. My current setup can run the Unigine benchmark at max settings at an average of 22fps. I think for a budget gaming rig that's pretty darn good.

Time and time again benchmarks have proven that Intel Core i7 is much faster than AMD's top offerings. Why would you doubt Intel has better multitasking, when it gets beat in performance tests? I'm not trying to troll, because yes, AMD is great value for the money, and Intel comes at a premium. Don't see your logic here...Personally, I'd rather have a Hyperthreaded turbo-boosted hexa core Intel i7.

Intel CPU's are great for single, high power applications. But the multitasking power of my AMD is amazing. Its like comparing a Ferrari to an F350. Can you haul 350lbs of luggage, your entire family and the dogs in your Ferrari? While the Ferrari will win in a race, they still have similar power and similar ability to perform.

That used to be true before the Core i5/7. Today Intel CPUs are just faster whatever the scenario.

That used to be true before the Core i5/7. Today Intel CPUs are just faster whatever the scenario.

Really? Whatever the scenario? I got alot of results that say otherweise. As soon as it comes to multithreading AMD's FX will pull ahead, I'm not even going to talk about Linux benchmarks as thats a different story, FX has a whole new life over there.

Whoever was comparing IB to FX (Currently bulldozer) should look up when BD was release and when was IB released.

Anyway to the people who plan to buy Piledriver, there are some big changes.

Quad-channel DDR3

Up to 10 cores

HT

Dynamic scheduling and speculative execution

8 CUs with two cores per a CU.

AMD released a software optimization guide for Piledriver in January. You can read more about it here.

http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/47414_15h_sw_opt_guide.pdf

Really? Whatever the scenario? I got alot of results that say otherweise. As soon as it comes to multithreading AMD's FX will pull ahead
Feel free to share them, because the last time I checked, FX got smoked by the entire Core i5/7 line on nearly every benchmark, including heavily threaded ones, like C++ compilation. I think FX very slightly won on synthetic 7-zip performance, x264 2nd pass and that's basically it. And even there it still loses to the latest 3770k.

Example

Feel free to share them, because the last time I checked, FX got smoked by the entire Core i5/7 line on nearly every benchmark, including heavily threaded ones, like C++ compilation. I think FX very slightly won on synthetic 7-zip performance, x264 2nd pass and that's basically it. And even there it still loses to the latest 3770k.

Example

First of all, 3770k is a newer CPU then Bulldozer is so I can't understand why do you keep comparing them?

Secondly.

photoshop.png

41698.png

CCIMG55.png

c-rayir38.png

(Keep in mind its as fast as an $1000 Intel CPU whilist the 8150 costs around $200)

Synthetic_01.png

Anyway I got tons more but is a pain in my *ss to upload them all here.

I love the fact that when ever FX is better in a benchmark it will be labled syntetic instantly but untill then its the most widley used benchmark. Typical.

Also dear sir, just to finish our d*ck comparing, please do read on the .pdf I linked earlier and please do look up all the changes Piledriver comes with, alot of the software problems are going to be fixed with it so even if it might not be as good as Intel CPU's it'll sure close the gap a bit. :) Have a good day and please do Your own Intel topic as I'd really like to talk to people who actually have one FX or want one in the future :)

and to top it off when AMD/MS release the patch for the FX it should perform even better :D

so I think +Dr_Asik you just got smoked :woot:

Don't worry he'll be back soon stating that those benchmarks "show nothing and are usless". They always will :rofl:

Altho I think MS already released 2 patches altho they didn't change much ~1-2% gain. Not too sure if they are working on a new one.

Well, I have to say I am plesantly surpprised with the performance of my AMD FX-8120.

Some of the best features are its brute speed when it comes to multiplexing and Transcoding Hi-Def Video. Its also fast as hell when processing .FLAC Audio. All is indeed very good news it also over clocks well. I am just waiting for a pair HD7950 to come through the post.

Check out this rather large system spec. under full load :)

amdfx812039ghzbenchstre.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Well, I have to say I am plesantly surpprised with the performance of my AMD FX-8120.

Some of the best features are its brute speed when it comes to multiplexing and Transcoding Hi-Def Video. Its also fast as hell when processing .FLAC Audio. All is indeed very good news it also over clocks well. I am just waiting for a pair HD7950 to come through the post.

Does the Gigabyte 990 perform good? I made the stupidest mistake when I bought an 970 series from Gigabyte also, running on PCI-E on 4x lol :(

Now Im between Formula V and the one you got now (990 GB), if the GB one is okay I'll go with that because the price differnce is almost 100 euros :|

x264.jpgpovray.jpgcinebench-x.jpg

cinebench.jpgpcmark7.jpgpovray.jpg

Synthetic_01.pngSynthetic_02.pngSynthetic_04.png

Application_01.pngApplication_03.png

Application_04.pngEncoding_02.png

Got this from Legitreviews review of the i7-3770k and Techspot's review of the Core i7 3770k You should compare whatever is the latest/greatest from Intel with whatever is the latest/greatest from AMD - these are recently released CPU's from both companies. What more do you want - compare the Bulldozer to the Core 2 lineup? Every review I have seen says i7 for pure performance, and yes that comes with price.

Trust me, I want AMD to succeed, and competition is a great thing to have between two companies - brings better CPU's, lower prices, etc.. If you can't admit AMD is getting whopped now, then you are just not looking clearly at the benchmarks...

Thats exactly what you are doing right now. Ironic isn't it.

How so? Core 2 was released around Summer '06, and important to note it's no longer being produced nor is it anywhere on Intel's current roadmap. Bulldozer was released in October 2011, with CPU's still being produced today. Intel's i7 Sandy Bridge was released January 2011, with CPU's being produced today. Sandy Bridge-E was released in November 2011, and still being produced today. If you look at the charts, there are Sandy Bridge-E CPU's kicking AMD's ass.

I'm comparing the two current flagship models from both brands. :shifty:

Sure, what ever lets you sleep at night.

So what do you want to see a comparison of?

Believe me, I'm not losing any sleep at night over AMD vs. Intel or other technology related comparisons. I could care less who's better, and in the end consumers win. I just want what's best performance wise at a good price. It is just apparent you love AMD a little too much.

So what do you want to see a comparison of?

Believe me, I'm not losing any sleep at night over AMD vs. Intel or other technology related comparisons. I could care less who's better, and in the end consumers win. I just want what's best performance wise at a good price. It is just apparent you love AMD a little too much.

It's not about me loving them or not.

Comparsion? I don't want to see any as I already saw from graphs that you posted that the 8150 can easily hold up with the 2500k and 2600k (which are 8150's Generation CPUs).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!