Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Help with webhosting?||
|uTorrent client is stealing your CPU cycles to mine Bitcoins||
|Your thoughts on VR headsets?||
|Need help upgrading from window 8.1 OEM to 8.1 pro||
|New feature found - Geofencing!||
Posted 27 April 2012 - 12:12
Posted 27 April 2012 - 12:27
I agree. There had been photos released a few years ago claiming to be Source 2, but they were never verified.
At this point, I'd prefer it if Valve developed Half-Life 3 with a new engine (e.g. Source engine 2). The latest version of Source engine is somewhat limited in comparison to other engines like CryENGINE 3 or Frostbite 2. The frequent loading screens of Portal 2 is a good indication of that. Also, I don't think Valve has the resources to develop Half-Life 3 alongside Dota 2 and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. On top of that, they're still releasing content for Team Fortress 2 and Portal 2. Once they get those games out of the way, they should focus on Source engine 2 and Half-Life 3.