Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to purchase a router with a very strong range. For some reason, despite forking out reasonable money (?50-ish) for a router previously, I'm still struggling to get a decent signal in all areas of the house despite the fact that it's a small 3-bedroom council maisonette with plaster walls. Why... I really can't figure out.

SO! I'm looking at getting a new router, but I really don't fancy being burned again by a router again with signal strength that won't even cover my whole house. Preferably this router would have USB mass storage over network capabilities (although not needed) and external antennas?

I'm not really what you would define as a "power user" when it comes to networking - so things like Tomato support, DHCP customisation, heavy QoS and traffic shaping, etc, aren't really a necessity for me. Of course, if it supports these, I won't complain! On the flipside, I'm not afraid to get my hands a little dirty when setting up my router either - so while hand-holding installations are nice they're not a necessity for me.

As long as the router has a high LOS, 300N, the ability to change channels/switch to auto, and doesn't look like a 90s switch box, it's good for me :) My budget is ?100, although if we can keep it below ?75 that'd be best.

Thanks guys :)

NETGEAR WNDR4500 is without a doubt the best consumer router currently available. Not sure what it costs in the UK, but here in the US it is $178.

If not too pricey for you in UK I can defo recommend it. Check out the Newegg reviews too. Excellent router.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122435&Tpk=wndr4500

Are you sure it is the router and not the device's WiFi capabilities?? Have you tried accessing the same router with other devices?

100% the router.

Tried it with my DS, 3DS, PSP, HTC Desire, HTC Mozart, Lumia 800, an iPhone 3GS and a 4S and 3 laptops (not all mine!). I always get the same issue in the same parts of the house, pretty much. Wavers ever so slightly, but on the whole it always throws a wobbly in the same parts of the house, so yeah, I'd say it's the router. All those devices can't be wrong, surely?

Squuiid: I'll check out that router, thanks!

Multiple cheap routers and cascade them or WDS them (for a completely terrible speed)

One will not do it and will be a serious waste of money.

the airport extreme and the airport express systems do this - if you can deal with apple. Other than that, get some DD-WRT compatible routers and set them up to distribute the wifi quite easily. Not sure how the iptables will need to be modified to allow traffic from any router to see any other router in the system.

Also the WNDR4500 is a very good router, I just upgraded my 310N to this model and even running the stock firmware I am satisifed. But, for WIRELESS, the 3700 is actually much better! (read around) The 4500 advantage is that I switched everything over to 5GHz, which provides increased range (higher freq = smaller wave) and it allows 40MHz bandwidth rather than 2.4GHz's 20MHz bandwidth. so on a 300Mbps connection with 2.4GHz I get around 7-9MB/s and on 5GHz I get around 15MB/s

I would just get 2 or 3 linksys 4200, flash with DD-WRT, add some active cooling (as they get hot and problematic! Same chipset as the wndr4500 actually) and throw one upstairs and one downstairs as 2 separate wifi points, then allow the wifi system to choose which one it wants to access. (configure both points in all wifi devices and they'll configure auto)

Also - theres no interference? microwaves, cordless phones, scanners, walkie-talkies, or anything else using the band? again the 'manual channel' forcing would avoid this interference.

100% the router.

Tried it with my DS, 3DS, PSP, HTC Desire, HTC Mozart, Lumia 800, an iPhone 3GS and a 4S and 3 laptops (not all mine!). I always get the same issue in the same parts of the house, pretty much. Wavers ever so slightly, but on the whole it always throws a wobbly in the same parts of the house, so yeah, I'd say it's the router. All those devices can't be wrong, surely?

Squuiid: I'll check out that router, thanks!

They are known as deadspots. Despite how much power you emit, its likley the waves will propagate the same way and still be horrible.

try some different channels - force your router to go to channel 1.. then test. switch to 2. unplug and plug back in (so devices reinitialize new channel) and test again.. keep going. each channel is separated by a few MHz so they will propigate differently. Ensure you test other areas too as it may fix area 1 but create a new problem in area 2.

5GHz signal maybe your best bet if you want one device - but your devices list, I think the 4s is the only one which can actually do 5GHz wifi... I know the ds, psp, desire, 3gs and probably the laptops (depending) won't.

Multiple cheap routers and cascade them or WDS them (for a completely terrible speed)

One will not do it and will be a serious waste of money.

the airport extreme and the airport express systems do this - if you can deal with apple. Other than that, get some DD-WRT compatible routers and set them up to distribute the wifi quite easily. Not sure how the iptables will need to be modified to allow traffic from any router to see any other router in the system.

Also the WNDR4500 is a very good router, I just upgraded my 310N to this model and even running the stock firmware I am satisifed. But, for WIRELESS, the 3700 is actually much better! (read around)

I would just get 2 or 3 linksys 4200, flash with DD-WRT, add some active cooling (as they get hot and problematic! Same chipset as the wndr4500 actually) and throw one upstairs and one downstairs as 2 separate wifi points, then allow the wifi system to choose which one it wants to access.

Am I able to setup the second 4200 as a Wi-Fi repeater or would it have to be it's own thing? The reason being is cabling... having to drill a hole in the floor/ceiling to get a network cable down would be a ******. I could use powerline adapter, but surely that's just asking for trouble?

They are known as deadspots. Despite how much power you emit, its likley the waves will propagate the same way and still be horrible.

try some different channels - force your router to go to channel 1.. then test. switch to 2. unplug and plug back in (so devices reinitialize new channel) and test again.. keep going. each channel is separated by a few MHz so they will propigate differently. Ensure you test other areas too as it may fix area 1 but create a new problem in area 2.

5GHz signal maybe your best bet if you want one device - but your devices list, I think the 4s is the only one which can actually do 5GHz wifi... I know the ds, psp, desire, 3gs and probably the laptops (depending) won't.

Ah, I didn't think of that. The DS and PSP don't get any online loving anymore, the 3DS is usually used in the good zones, the Desire I no longer own and the iPhones aren't even mine. These would be for my Lumia, the laptop and other future devices I might own. That's a great suggestion though, I might force different channels through and see how that works.

Just a thought though - would my microwave cause any issues, even when it's not in use? Just a random thought that's popped into my head.

Actually the new Netgear R6300 Dual Band Gigabit WiFi Router is now the premium router based on the new AC standard (supports previous N, etc).

Yes, you need the clients to support the standard but it gives far better throughput and increased range so a better buy in the long term.

Actually the new Netgear R6300 Dual Band Gigabit WiFi Router is now the premium router based on the new AC standard (supports previous N, etc).

Yes, you need the clients to support the standard but it gives far better throughput and increased range so a better buy in the long term.

This isn't out yet.

Multiple cheap routers and cascade them or WDS them (for a completely terrible speed)

One will not do it and will be a serious waste of money.

the airport extreme and the airport express systems do this - if you can deal with apple. Other than that, get some DD-WRT compatible routers and set them up to distribute the wifi quite easily. Not sure how the iptables will need to be modified to allow traffic from any router to see any other router in the system.

Also the WNDR4500 is a very good router, I just upgraded my 310N to this model and even running the stock firmware I am satisifed. But, for WIRELESS, the 3700 is actually much better! (read around) The 4500 advantage is that I switched everything over to 5GHz, which provides increased range (higher freq = smaller wave)

You are mistaken. 5GHz has far less range than 2.4GHz.

This is VERY true. the 5GHz on my netgear has better range as my 2.4GHz linksys did, but the linksys was single-band and the netgear is dual or tri band - (more ways to connect and less multipath echos) Higher freq = smaller wave = less propagation.

So, speaking strictly range, your BEST bet is to get a 802.11b router in 1-2MB/s mode, as it will give the MAXIMUM range possible as it has the largest wavelength. http://www.medicalel...medical-devices paragraph below fig 1. specifically states this. All in all this is a good read too.

Im thinking that multipath is the problem in the OP setup, and signal propagation is more of an issue than actual coverage.. 5GHz will not (likely) remedy this problem. It will only fix interference issues and allow double the throughput.

Maybe go buy $600 worth of routers (dlink, netgear and linksys) and test them for the 14 days or whatever the return policy is.. see which works better and return the other 2.

http://www.ko4bb.com..._2_and_5GHz.pdf

this is a good PDF, they test propagation through things and plot it. like blinds, carpet, glass, brick, water, nearly everything. In the abstract they derive -6.8dB is mathematically calculated gain from a jump of 2.4 to 5GHz (in laymens terms, if 2.4GHz is 100% strength you'd get 25% strength with 5GHz, as every 3dB loss is halfing the power)

Now - according to their tests, the experienced loss is about equal on both bands.... This means the propagation loss experienced is the same, so signal range would be about the same. Maybe the linksys isn't all that bad afterall.

OP: Kinda went on a tangent but out of this, if there is a lot of full water piping running between floors - 2.4GHz will be severely affected. This is also why microwaves use this frequency, as it excites water and heats up our food (and also explains why things without water in them won't heat right)

I doubt you have the gear to test how well signals propagate, so i'd just try routers and if they don't work or you don't like, return them until you either proved the top of the line ones aren't any better than what you got or you found one that works. FWIW, find one you like, return it, then order for likely cheaper online.

Asus RT-N56U.

I pull up in my car outside the house and get a signal before I even get out. There's a long garden between the car park and my house too.

The range is phenomenal.

?100 but well worth it and it looks great :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!