Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Noticeable difference in speed between SATA2 (285MB/s) & SATA3 (550 MB/


19 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 kiddingguy

    ^ Nikki, my dreambabe!

  • 2,901 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 03
  • Location: .nl
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate & Windows 8 Pro

Posted 06 May 2012 - 11:55

I currently have an OCZ Vertex 2 SSD (read around 285MB/s; write 275MB/s)
Is an Intel 520 SSD (r: 550 MB/s; w: 500 MB/s) noticeable faster or doesn't it matter in day-to-day activities?

The SSD will be primary used for Windows booting, and starting of programs like Kaspersky IS, IE, OL2010, Photoshop Elements and a bit of Word and Excel etc.


#2 Detection

    Detecting stuff...

  • 8,369 posts
  • Joined: 30-October 10
  • Location: UK
  • OS: 7 SP1 x64

Posted 06 May 2012 - 11:58

Copying files would be faster, its the access speeds (seek time) you would notice the most between drives for normal opening of programs I would imagine, although I doubt it would be massively noticable between SSDs really

#3 philcruicks

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,502 posts
  • Joined: 24-February 09
  • Location: Bracknell, UK

Posted 06 May 2012 - 12:03

Yeah providing you have a SATA3 connection on your Mobo, you should notice an increase, its not gona be massively noticeable, but your talking nearly double the access speeds..

#4 OP kiddingguy

    ^ Nikki, my dreambabe!

  • 2,901 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 03
  • Location: .nl
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate & Windows 8 Pro

Posted 06 May 2012 - 12:26

@philcruicks; I have a SATA3 connection on my mobo

#5 OP kiddingguy

    ^ Nikki, my dreambabe!

  • 2,901 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 03
  • Location: .nl
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate & Windows 8 Pro

Posted 11 May 2012 - 15:13

There might be some sort of increase, but it's not worth the bucks (from what I understand here....)?!

#6 Astra.Xtreme

    Electrical Engineer

  • 5,919 posts
  • Joined: 02-January 04
  • Location: Milwaukee, WI

Posted 11 May 2012 - 15:21

Keep tabs on the deals that occur and you can probably get a good deal on a recent SSD.
I bought a 120GB Vertex 3 for $100 after rebates a few months back.
I believe you can get a 128GB M4 for $120 currently. The OCZ drives seemed to have spiked in price lately.
Intel tends to be the most expensive of the bunch for whatever reason.

#7 Bun-Bun

    Goiva @ PSN

  • 1,949 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 04
  • Location: Portugal

Posted 11 May 2012 - 15:37

Not noticeable at all unless you just run benchmarks all day and look at the pretty numbers. Save your money.

#8 Wakers

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,642 posts
  • Joined: 30-July 07

Posted 11 May 2012 - 16:23

Depends what you do. If you spend a large amount of time copying files or if you play a lot of big games, you might notice the load and copy times increase from ssd to ssd.

General windows use? We're probably talking a fraction of a second increase.

#9 OP kiddingguy

    ^ Nikki, my dreambabe!

  • 2,901 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 03
  • Location: .nl
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate & Windows 8 Pro

Posted 12 May 2012 - 00:18

I'm talking general Windows use.

For games I already have an Vertex Turbo SSD and a 10000 RPM WD Raptor.

#10 MorganX

    MegaZilla™

  • 2,052 posts
  • Joined: 16-June 04
  • Location: Midwest USA
  • OS: Digital Storm Bolt, Windows 8 Pro w/Media Center Pack, Server 2k12 - Core i7 3770K/16GB DDR3/HyperX SSD/EVGA Nvidia 650 Ti
  • Phone: Lumia 920; Surface RT, HTC 8X, HTC the ONE (soon)

Posted 12 May 2012 - 00:37

Tray SATA6. You will notice a difference, PhotoShop will open off an SSD as fast a Painbrush.

@kiddingguy, for games, USB 3.0 has made life an inexpensive joy for me. I actually have some games that just don't like running off an SSD.

#11 +djdanster

    Neowin elite

  • 2,795 posts
  • Joined: 28-October 08
  • Location: England, Great Britain
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 White

Posted 12 May 2012 - 00:38

I have 2 OCZ Agility 3 SSD's in RAID 0, going at nearly 1.1GB/s read and write. I can boot into windows with a fully usable desktop after the bios screen in 12 seconds! I can open heavy programs such as Photoshop in 3 seconds! If you can afford it and the motherboard supports it, this is definitely the future!

#12 Wakers

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,642 posts
  • Joined: 30-July 07

Posted 12 May 2012 - 20:31

@djdanster - eh, that's slow for an SSD.

i5-2400 and a Corsair Force 3 SSD here and Win 7 starts in 5 seconds (from BIOS to usable desktop) and Photoshop launches in 1 second or less.

#13 OP kiddingguy

    ^ Nikki, my dreambabe!

  • 2,901 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 03
  • Location: .nl
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate & Windows 8 Pro

Posted 12 May 2012 - 20:31

I'm not going RAID and am not planning to use it as game-SSD.

Still worth it for booting into Windows and day-to-day usage like IE, Chrome, Outlook and other Office products?

#14 Wakers

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,642 posts
  • Joined: 30-July 07

Posted 12 May 2012 - 21:01

Hmm..If it were me, I would say no.

I don't really care about boot times - my habit always was, and still is, turn on PC and make a drink. Boot time could be 3 minutes and I wouldn't notice.

Opening programs wise - office programs open instantly now, but they were only taking a second to open before.

#15 Kelxin

    Resident Fanatic

  • 518 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 04

Posted 13 May 2012 - 05:36

Went from an Intel X25 to an Intel 520, made an enormous difference for me.