Recommended Posts

So this is a topic that can fit under many forums be it hardware, server or technical support, etc. My question comes down to this: how do these large cloud services providers manage their back-end to automate and even segregate the services from each customer?

There are a couple examples of what I'm referring to the best of which is Microsoft's Office 365 or, more specifically, Hosted Exchange. I'm talking about everything from licensing to reverse DNS records. If I wanted to do something like this for my clients, I could have an Exchange server that accepts mail for many domains and I could create many users with specific email addresses manually assigned. This is entirely a manual process though. How do these large cloud services providers do this in an automated way? I would assume Microsoft would use a Microsoft product to accomplish this. Maybe they have created a custom system using APIs or something?

On the more technical side, if I were to have an Exchange server and do this, it would be behind one IP address and thus only one reverse DNS record could be made for a lookup back to it (right?). It's completely inefficient to have an exchange server for each person that signs up for Microsoft's Hosted Exchange. Another large setback to using one Exchange server is the originating server's responding FQDN. As far as I know, this can be only one domain and if someone were to look at the an emails message details, they could see that this person's email did not come from domainxyz.co but from another domain123.co as would all other customers on the same Exchange server.

Hopefully someone has insight on this!

As a simple answer of "it just works don't worry about it" I would add in,

At a level of Microsoft or Google's services, you are talking custom written software to run all of this.

So they can program it exactly how they want it.

Which I would expect from Rackspace (another of these cloud providers) but I was hoping that Microsoft would be using their own product/tools to do this. I can understand though that to make this readily available creates direct competition.

I know that it just works and I'm fine with that. However there are some technical aspects such as reverse DNS records and FQDN responses that are fundamental workings of email technology, I don't think a custom software can make exceptions to how these things work.

accepting mail is different than sending mail. You don't need a PTR for accepting mail.. The only time a ptr is checked is the accepting server checking the server sending it mail - if no valid PTR then its most likely some fly by night mail server, etc.. and prob spam - so sure many major domains will not accept mail from such a server.

But this is not the case with having servers that accept mail for users.. They do not need ptr to match anything.

You can have a cluster of servers accepting mail on lots of different IPs, or even behind a load balancer accepting the connection on 1 IP and then sending on to email servers behind that to handle the getting of the mail and then once accepting it routing it to the mail server the mail box sits on for that user.

Take a look at your say gmail or yahoo.com headers for email sent to you.. It more than likely routes through a few servers on gmail or yahoo side.

example

Delivered-To: [email protected]

Received: by 10.60.141.201 with SMTP id rq9csp9608oeb;

Wed, 9 May 2012 10:23:08 -0700 (PDT)

Received: by 10.182.44.74 with SMTP id c10mr1164113obm.43.1336584188741;

Wed, 09 May 2012 10:23:08 -0700 (PDT)

Return-Path: <[email protected]>

Received: from mail.adagio.com (mail.adagio.com. [67.192.109.186])

by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fq1si187201obc.135.2012.05.09.10.23.08

see where mx.google.com got it from mail.adagio.com -- then it went through 2 private IPs in googles network before I got it.

This is routing internal to gmail system..

Same goes for the way back out -- you send email using gmail to say yahoo. You create the message on the server you connected too, its more than likely going to be routed through a few servers again before it gets to the actual sending server(s) that will send the mail to yahoo.

If you want to understand how an email message flows - just look at the headers, it will show you all the different email servers that message went through to get from where sent to your mailbox.

Basically I am researching how I can duplicate these hosted Exchange solutions for my clients.Typically for my clients who have their own mail server, headers will read that the message originated from their domain/networks because of the send connector. If I host their mail, it will come from me. Is that unavoidable? Or am I being way to concerned about what the message headers say?

In an Exchange server that is hosting mail for many domains, what is the best way segregate the customers? Different databases? Could you create different send connectors for each domain and somehow only allow certain databases to send out with a connector? This would solve the outgoing mail headers having a strange originating domain. But can you have multiple PTRs going back to the same IP?

not sure why your hung up on PTR? so you want your sending server to match up with their forward domain?

So for example you have domainA.tld, domainB.tld, domainC.tld

And all being sent from same email server at 1.2.3.4, your concerned that when someone looks up 1.2.3.4 PTR it will reflect say mx.domainZ.tld?

There there is no way to have multiple PTR records for the same IP. Sure you can have mx.domainA.tld, mx.domainB.tld both point to the same IP.

I would not worry too much about the PTR, as long as its valid. So for example mx.domainZ.tld, while that server hosts mail for domainA, domainB, domainC, etc.. you don't even have to have the mx for domainA point to something domainA, it can point to mx.domainZ.tld just fine -- does not matter what the name of the server is accepting the mail for a specific domain.. Quite often it does not match.

example neowin.net mx points to google servers. Companies host their mail on other domains all the time, the name of the server that accepts mail for your domain does not have to be in the same domain.

Keep in mind that the sending server is not always the same name as the sending domain either. Just look through the headers of the email in your inbox

not sure why your hung up on PTR? so you want your sending server to match up with their forward domain?

So for example you have domainA.tld, domainB.tld, domainC.tld

And all being sent from same email server at 1.2.3.4, your concerned that when someone looks up 1.2.3.4 PTR it will reflect say mx.domainZ.tld?

That is exactly my concern. I would like it to be as seemingly segregated as possible. Do you think this is impossible when using one Exchange server? I think you answered that here:

There there is no way to have multiple PTR records for the same IP. Sure you can have mx.domainA.tld, mx.domainB.tld both point to the same IP.

This is only one technicality that I'm hung up on. I am still curious how Exchange is best configured to manage multiple domains.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
    • OpenAI's new GPT-5.5-Cyber tops Claude Mythos 5 in vulnerability benchmark by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI today announced a major expansion of Daybreak, a cybersecurity initiative designed to help defenders find, validate, and fix software vulnerabilities earlier in the development process. The availability of powerful AI models has definitely changed the cybersecurity landscape by making vulnerability discovery much faster. However, the bigger bottleneck for the industry is now patching those vulnerabilities. Impacted software teams need to validate the discovered issues, understand their impact, develop fixes, test them, and deploy patches. Back in March, OpenAI launched a preview of Codex Security, which uses agentic reasoning with automated validation to discover high-impact issues and actionable fixes specific to the codebase. Since then, it has scanned more than 30 million commits across over 30,000 codebases; more than 70,000 findings were marked as fixed by human reviewers, while over 500,000 findings were automatically determined to be fixed. Now, OpenAI is releasing an updated Codex Security plugin that can run deep scans, review recent code changes, generate security reports, trace attack paths, validate findings, and create codebase-specific patches for human review. It can also triage findings from existing scanners, advisories, bug bounty reports, and ticketing systems. OpenAI says the plugin can export results to vulnerability management systems and integrate with workflows using SARIF files, CodeQL queries, the Codex CLI, and the Codex app. Back in May, OpenAI announced the preview of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a new model built on top of the recently released GPT-5.5, designed for specialized cybersecurity work. Today, OpenAI launched the full version of GPT-5.5-Cyber through a limited release for verified defenders. On CyberGym, GPT-5.5-Cyber scored 85.6%, compared with 81.8% for GPT-5.5 and 83.8% for Claude Mythos 5. It also scored 39.5% on ExploitGym, compared with 25.95% for GPT-5.5, and 69.8% on SEC-bench Pro, compared with 63.1%. OpenAI also announced the new Daybreak Cyber Partner Program, which will allow security vendors and service providers to use GPT-5.5 with Trusted Access for Cyber in their products and services. Accenture, Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, IBM, Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, SentinelOne, Wiz, Zscaler, and others were listed as initial partners for this program. OpenAI is also launching Patch the Planet with Trail of Bits, HackerOne, Calif, researchers, and maintainers. More than 30 open-source projects have committed to participate, including cURL, Go, Python, Sigstore, and pyca/cryptography.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs by Sayan Sen Earlier today AMD released a major graphics driver update as it brings support for FSR 4.1 to Radeon RX 7000 series GPUs. The new update, version 26.6.2, also brings support for Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and more. And while the driver technically supports Windows 10 version 21H2 and newer, the tech giant has confirmed that there is a major issue with the new driver on non-Windows 11 PCs as it fails to launch properly on such systems. The error message says, "The version of AMD Software that you have launched is not compatible with your currently installed AMD graphics driver." Therefore on the surface it looks like a compatibility problem. AMD has also confirmed that the device manager will display the yellow bang or yellow exclamation sign alongside your GPU under the Display adapters dropdown. Here is what the Radeon team's official advisory recommends to affected users: "Users Running Windows 10 and AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 May Encounter Yellow Bang in Device Manager Affecting AMD Radeon RX Series Graphics ... Our Engineers are currently investigating this issue and will provide a fix once it is available. Affected users may revert to AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.1 as a temporary workaround." As such you should revert back to the previous 26.6.1 driver which was released earlier this month. In case you were looking to play Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and DOOM: The Dark Ages | Revelations you will probably have to wait a while if you want the driver to support those games officially. You can find the support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • https://uupdump.net/selectlang...7829-4524-978d-7b5fe79263e3
    • A McDonald's restaurant uses about 1.5 to 2 million gallons of water per year for operations like food preparation, cleaning, and restrooms. That is a lot less than the 2,083 gallons of water per megawatt hour mentioned above.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      208
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!