Recommended Posts

So I went to the optician the other week for my regular check-up. They for the first time prescribed me some glasses, dubbing them "strain relief glasses".

Now, I don't really have any problems with my eyesight, I can see stuff close and far away, and to be honest, I can see just as well with them on, or off without having to squint or anything like that.

Problem is, when I DO wear them, I have this weird feeling at the back of my eyes, like it's actually causing some kind of strain, it makes my eyes feel sort of tired.

Not having glasses before, I wondered if this is normal? One of my friends said it could take weeks for this feeling to go away but if they're strain relieving glasses, surely they shouldn't cause any problems?!

BTW, I didn't even think there were any issues before I was told I should have these, no headaches or anything so what do you think? They sort of feel pointless to me.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1076591-glasses/
Share on other sites

I used to get a weird tingly feeling due to the bridge resting on my nasal. Most sunglasses can do this to me. Maybe you're getting this? You get used to it eventually.

If you think they're pointless, don't bother with 'em. If you can see fine, and don't need them for driving or reading then what's the point? If you feel that wearing the glasses doesn't change the image you see then what's the point? For me, when I first put my glasses on everything was immediately clear and sharp.

What's your prescription? I'm like -2 or something.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1076591-glasses/#findComment-594861063
Share on other sites

Something like -0.50 +0.25. It's the same result I had a couple of years ago at a different optitian and they said I'd be fine without glasses :s

They said I overall have fine eyesight, a problem could occur when my brain tries to primarily use the signal from my stronger right eye and attempt to ignore the left more so.

The ache isn't so much exterior but more from behind my eyes internally.

When the guy was testing different lenses on my eyes with the strange spectacle contraption, he handed me a piece of paper to read with some fine print at the bottom. I read it fine with the lenses in, but just out of interest, I pulled them up for a second to see how it looked without them and I could read it just as well, no squinting or anything. Still he said I should have them.

Just the week I'd gone to the optician, I'd been having some neck/head pains, turns out in the end it was my crappy pillows causing (as advised by an osteopath) it but I'd mentioned it to the optician so I imagine that's why he was so adamant that I needed the glasses.

Kinda feel cheated out of my ?85. Also, they look TERRIBLE on me, I never have been able to find any glasses which suit me.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1076591-glasses/#findComment-594861305
Share on other sites

Something like -0.50 +0.25, they said I overall have fine eyesight, a problem could occur when my brain tries to primarily use the signal from my stronger right eye and attempt to ignore the left more so. It's the same result I had a couple of years ago at a different optitian and they said I'd be fine without glasses :s

The ache isn't so much exterior but more from behind my eyes internally.

If you're eyesight is unbalanced then one of your eyes will strain more doing activity (even if you think you can see fine), over time it means that one eye works harder and wears out quicker, and the other eye could become lazy - basically the problem gets worse and worse with time.

Whilst it may have little to no impact on current vision, the intent is to relieve the strain and prolong your 'good-ish' vision.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1076591-glasses/#findComment-594861331
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      407
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      167
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!