Recommended Posts

Intro

Having owned the Hazro HZ24Wi (h-IPS) since before launch I've been fully covered as far as photo editing goes but recently I've been feeling an itch, an itch for a 2nd monitor that wasn't the 19" TN panel Samsung I was using to plonk workflow palettes and sidebar gadgets, a screen that could do all those and more...and so the research began!

I've owned various VA/IPS and even TN panel monitors whilst owning the Hazro and none of them really wowed me except maybe the HP 24W which had excellent performance and quality but at the time it had a pink tinge problem that was documented quite well (now long resolved though) so I returned it. I've also owned the Dell 2405 series and was not happy with any of them due to input lag for gaming which was easily noticeable and also a slight mouse lag delay in Windows itself.

So after lots of reading reviews and seeing what's offering the best bang for buck I bought the U2410 for ?250.

Initial thoughts

desktop_dellu2410_2.jpg

The plastic casing and stand build quality seem OK but I do note that they're not as solid feeling as the monitors Dell used to sell such as the 2405/2000WFP etc. Saying that though, the thing is put together solidly and the front bezel and buttons have a professional look and feel to them. I like the backlit power button which is the LED indicator, it's little things like that that impress me most and it's a faint blue glow as opposed to a mini torch.

desktop_dellu2410_3.jpg

The stand offers all adjustments needed from height to tilt/rotate and pivot, standard stuff for a Dell display of this class so nothing new there.

Image quality

Powering it up and connecting to my PC via the supplied DVI cable I noticed the colours at default appeared visually acceptable but brightness was quite high. Side by side next to the Hazro though you could tell there was quite a difference. Dell opt for a 50/75 Brightness and Contrast setting and the colour temp is set to "Standard" which is the same as the custom preset of 6500k within the menu.

desktop_dellu2410_4.jpg

(The menu offers a raft of options to customise the display and the UI itself is very easy to navigate and actually one of the more pleasing to look at I have seen on a Display. Dell has always excelled here I feel.)

I saw no obvious backlight bleeding either but since this is an IPS display you do get the IPS tinge effect when moving around the screen from various angles. this isn't a problem as you soon get used to it and it's automatically ignored by your brain. The tinge is minimised on more professional end IPS displays by use of a front polariser but they also cost a lot more too :)

**I connected up the EyeOneDisplay 2 colorometer and fired up Lacie's BlueEye software to begin calibration. Here is where I saw the actual results of the factory defaults, colour temp was actually closer to 5700 than 6500 and the luminance value was not far from 120cd/m2. 120 is accepted as the norm for average room lighting and monitor usage, Some people prefer a lower luminance value while others prefer a brighter (higher) output. This aspect doesn't really affect the end result much so it's more of a preference thing than not. I like a low luminance value as it's more pleasing when reading text on a white background so have my monitors around 90cd/m2 and this has yet to compromise shadow detail.

Once calibrated the results were:

desktop_dellu2410_CalibrationReport.PNG

That's better than my Hazro and that has a h-IPS display compared to the cheaper e-IPS on the Dell. Rather happy with that :)

I then checked that black and white shades were visible:

Blacks: http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php

Whites: http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/white.php

Chart: http://www.photofrid...m/calibrate.php

All were fine, the white shade test on panel 254 was faint but still visible. Out of the box, before calibration, the black panels 1 and 2 were not that visible really and the last 2 on the white test were the same.

desktop_dellu2410_5.jpg

Now that it was calibrated I fired up Lightroom and checked through previous edits and was rather pleased at my new found advantage of having a monitor dedicated to portrait orientation :D

Gaming

I played some Battlefield 3 and saw no problems with input lag or ghosting. I left Overdrive enabled as this can be turned off from the service menu. I didn't expect to see any lag or ghosting either having read the TFT Central review and saw their results and it wasn't far from the Hazro which also had no problems gaming.

Closing

For ?250 the U2412M has excellent performance, features and image quality (though only truly usable after calibration if you require accurate colours for photo editing). The only thing it lacks really is HDMI but you could use a DVI to HDMI adapter and use Display Port for the other connection as graphics cards these days have Display Port outputs. It comes with 4 USB2 downstream ports as well but I didn't bother testing this as it's not something that I will ever use.

Maybe some people will find this review useful I don't know but I thought it was worthwhile sharing my experience of this monitor and I think it's a perfect upgrade for someone on a ~22" screen but wants a proper 16:10 aspect ratio display instead of the many 16:9 ones out there and also wants good image quality with good performance in games. It won't rank up with 120Hz TN panels for gaming of course but where it doesn't match them it strips them naked for viewing angles and picture quality.

**If you edit photos or just want accurate colours then it's worth investing in a calibration probe of some description from Spyder or Xrite. It's a long term investment that pays for itself over the years because you're doing your eyes a favour and they can be used on multiple screens as many times as you like. I calibrate my screens once every 6 months or sooner if I make a big change like GFX upgrade or whatever.

UPDATE:

Here are my OSD settings and ICC profile that others might want to try on their U2412M screens as well. I created the profile using BlueEyePro and before clibration got as close to 120cd/m2 and 6500k using the pre-cal fine tune measurement. This allowed me to set the monitor OSD close to how it should be so when using other input sources the display is good enough. It also makes calibration easier for the software with less deviation due to extreme LUT changes.

Brightness: 25

Contrast: 75

Custom Colour Values:

R 86

G 87

B 92

http://robbiekhan.co.uk/root/files/2012.05.18_Dell_U2412M.icc

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1076723-dell-u2412m-24-e-ips-monitor/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Nice review, mrk. I've had my 2412M for a couple of months now and it's one of the best monitors I've owned for the price point. I use mine for gaming a fair bit and never notice any lag, and the colours on it are excellent once you give them a slight tweak.

I own this monitor and it's definitely worth every penny.

It's being used for Movies, Gaming, Reading and I specially love it's USB ports which I use a lot for External HDDs and USB peripherals such as gamepads.

The only downside is it doesn't offer an HDMI input, instead it offers a DVI and a Mini-Displayport which an HDMI would be greatly preferred.

The rotation feature is also nice and the 1920x1200 resolution is even greater.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!