• 0

Which language would you chose between C# and PHP


Question

I'm interested in changing career paths from computer repair and troubleshooting to programming. The two languages I'm looking at are C# and PHP. I understand the two are apples and oranges in comparison because they are for two entirely different things. However, I would like to learn a language that is in high demand and could give me a good level of job security. So based on your knowledge and experience, which of these two would you think could provide that? I appreciate any feed back you can provide.

Thanks! :D

Recommended Posts

  • 0

C# is more general-purpose, it's used on a wide variety of platforms (pretty much all) to do a wide variety of things, be it games, mobile apps, traditional GUI-based applications, web servers, etc. Syntax-wise, C# has a deep Java and C++ heritage; it's also only one of a family of diverse languages running on the .NET platform, including VB, F#, IronPython, IronRuby and many more. It's also a well-designed language and a pleasure to work with in general.

I haven't learned PHP, but from what I heard, I perceive it as hackish and quirky, and it's certainly much more limited in its application domain, that is, server-side code. I even wonder if it's not going to be entirely replaced by Javascript now that Javascript is used on the server as well, but that's pure theorizing on my part.

Both are in high demand but, again, it's a question of application domain. IMO C# opens many more doors than PHP.

  • 0

Definitely C#. You can do so much more with it. You can use it with ASP.NET for server-side stuff that you would use PHP for. Then there is the added benefit of everywhere else you can use C# - desktop apps, mobile apps...

I haven't learned PHP, but from what I heard, I perceive it as hackish and quirky

That's certainly how I would describe it.

  • 0

I haven't learned PHP, but from what I heard, I perceive it as hackish and quirky

I think this article, albeit long, sums up PHP pretty nicely.

http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/

  • 0

C/C#/C++/PHP/etc. all have relatively similar syntax, the main issues come down to the bindings or APIs provided. If you're looking at web programming look into things like Ruby or Python, for desktop programming C# would be fine.

I think this article, albeit long, sums up PHP pretty nicely.

http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/

That amazed me, I knew PHP was pretty meh, but I didn't realise it was that bad.

  • 0

As someone who has used both C# and PHP, I can't express enough how much better C# is. PHP is certainly a capable language, but you do notice quite quickly some very quirky design decisions. If you have the option, pick C#.

In terms of valuability as a career choice, there's not much in it in my experience. Web developers will tend to favour PHP (or Ruby or Python) since historically its cheaper to run as it didn't require a Windows Server, it was also one of the first languages tailored to web development.

On the other hand, business programming and desktop development is usually oriented around .net languages. C# being the favourite. As a C# developer, I'm regularly being approached with offers of C# developer jobs, so you'll certainly carry value knowing C#.

TL;DR pick C#

  • 0

Between the two choices, C# easily. Not just because it's a better language, but you can use the same language and tools for near everything.. web, desktop, mobile, gaming, etc, plus it's available for multiple operating systems. (Granted, as long as you can work with the deficiencies of Mono.)

I think this article, albeit long, sums up PHP pretty nicely.

http://me.veekun.com...-of-bad-design/

Good reading, really points out some of the absurd design choices in the language.

  • 0

C#. There are a lot of jobs out there on the .NET stack from mobile apps, back end web services, asp.net web sites to desktop apps and so on. It's a far more widely used language, whereas PHP pigeonholes you into web stuff.

Its also pretty easy to go to Java which is equally in demand, or to C++. PHP is starting to go out of fashion a bit. If programming languages ever were in fashion, anyway.

  • 0

I think this article, albeit long, sums up PHP pretty nicely.

http://me.veekun.com...-of-bad-design/

Oh my God. That seems worse than C++ somehow. I think I'm going to keep not learning PHP for a while. :laugh:

[Just for the record, there's a similar, even longer rant about C++ on the internet: http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/ ]

  • 0

Oh my God. That seems worse than C++ somehow. I think I'm going to keep not learning PHP for a while. :laugh:

That article summed up my experience with PHP nicely. I hate it, but I have to live with it (albeit only occasionally, thank the maker). Unless you specifically have to, don't learn PHP. It's an ugly language that tries to look like C (and now C++ since it's adding stuff like classes and, one day, namespaces), but never quite works how you'd expect it to. The level of inconsistency is pretty staggering too, which is only multiplying now that classes are being added into the mix. Besides, if you have to, it's pretty easy to pick up if you know C/C++, as it's a C-based syntax (with extra dollar signs). If you're looking to do web development, ASP.NET, Ruby, Python, are always there, and you can't really miss with any of them, they're all far superior to PHP.

  • 0

However, I would like to learn a language that is in high demand and could give me a good level of job security.

If this is what matters to you the most, then you should also consider Java. I'm not crazy about the language, but it wins hands down in the job market.

Still, out of the two you provided, I'd go with C# - but the languages are not only different in such silly terms as syntax - they serve different purposes.

With PHP you'll end up writing web-oriented systems, whereas C# is kind of a juggernaut for anything that you can run on Windows (in some cases, also Linux and Mac OS, but I've never used MonoDevelop myself, so take it with a grain of salt).

Then again, C# and Java are fairly similar (as far as the basic concepts go, of course), except that the other one is not platform-specific.

  • 0

IMO C# opens many more doors than PHP.

I disagree. Because PHP runs on any platform, it's much more flexible. It's the old proprietary vs FOSS argument again. Personally, I'd go with the FOSS tool every time. It's free, fully supported across all platforms, and it powers a great deal of the web.

I suppose it comes down to whether you're doing web development or general development. If it's more general you're after, I'd go for something like Java, Python, C, C++, Javascript. All very much in demand.

  • 0

Microsoft implementations run on Microsoft devices, and Mono runs everywhere else. So, C# runs, and is widely used, everywhere: in the mobile space, on the server, on the desktop client, on console. I don't think the same can be said of PHP.

  • 0

Microsoft implementations run on Microsoft devices, and Mono runs everywhere else.

Exactly. So it's not Microsoft's C#. It's another implementation that's poorly supported and does not have the same capabilities. I wouldn't recommend that to anyone. If you're only developing on Microsoft platforms, fair enough, but elsewhere, you're going to run into problems.

So, C# runs, and is widely used, everywhere: in the mobile space, on the server, on the desktop client, on console. I don't think the same can be said of PHP.

1. Mono isn't free on mobile. In fact it's quite costly.

2. Mono in general isn't as feature complete as Microsoft's implementation.

3. Mono's future is uncertain. SuSE fired most of their mono development team, and the new company formed to continue it is heavily involved in trying to monetise it. I wouldn't bet on Mono surviving for much longer.

4. Microsoft could choose to assert its patents against other implementations (like Mono) if it so wished in the future.

With so many problems concerning dotnet and C#'s crossplatform support, I would never recommend it.

Richard Stallman said it best

Debian's decision to include Mono in its principal way of installing GNOME, for the sake of Tomboy which is an application written in C#, leads the community in a risky direction. It is dangerous to depend on C#, so we need to discourage its use.

The problem is not unique to Mono; any free implementation of C# would raise the same issue. The danger is that Microsoft is probably planning to force all free C# implementations underground some day using software patents. (See http://swpat.org and http://progfree.org.) This is a serious danger, and only fools would ignore it until the day it actually happens. We need to take precautions now to protect ourselves from this future danger.

This is not to say that implementing C# is a bad thing. Free C# implementations permit users to run their C# programs on free platforms, which is good. (The GNU Project has an implementation of C# also, called Portable.NET.) Ideally we want to provide free implementations for all languages that programmers have used.

The problem is not in the C# implementations, but rather in Tomboy and other applications written in C#. If we lose the use of C#, we will lose them too. That doesn't make them unethical, but it means that writing them and using them is taking a gratuitous risk.

We should systematically arrange to depend on the free C# implementations as little as possible. In other words, we should discourage people from writing programs in C#. Therefore, we should not include C# implementations in the default installation of GNU/Linux distributions or in their principal ways of installing GNOME, and we should distribute and recommend non-C# applications rather than comparable C# applications whenever possible.

  • 0

Exactly. So it's not Microsoft's C#. It's another implementation that's poorly supported and does not have the same capabilities. I wouldn't recommend that to anyone. If you're only developing on Microsoft platforms, fair enough, but elsewhere, you're going to run into problems.

1. Mono isn't free on mobile. In fact it's quite costly.

2. Mono in general isn't as feature complete as Microsoft's implementation.

3. Mono's future is uncertain. SuSE fired most of their mono development team, and the new company formed to continue it is heavily involved in trying to monetise it. I wouldn't bet on Mono surviving for much longer.

4. Microsoft could choose to assert its patents against other implementations (like Mono) if it so wished in the future.

Myths and fear-mongering.

1) Mono sees frequent updates and development has not slowed or showed signs of immobility. New features in .NET are quickly implemented in Mono, often released before Microsoft.

2) Mono does not support certain Windows-specific .NET libraries such as WPF, because they are Windows-specific (so no one cares). Otherwise, the feature set is essentially the same. Mono also offers capabilities not present in Microsoft's .NET, such as SIMD support.

3) That MonoDroid and MonoTouch cost money doesn't make them any less available and supported. Besides, most people making a living of writing software are ready to invest 400$ in their tools.

4) People have been predicting the ruin of Mono since its inception. In reality, Mono has been a successful business venue for more than a decade now. MonoDroid and MonoTouch are popular tools that sell well and make a lot of money. Most of Mono is covered by ECMA standards, most of the remainder is under Microsoft Community Promise, and the little that isn't could be worked around, and there are little grounds to suspect concrete hostility by Microsoft. For all the fear-mongering, there hasn't been a single patent claim by Microsoft in Mono's 10 years of existence. Your Richard Stallman quote was answered by Ubuntu and Fedora thus:

"It is common practice in the software industry to register patents as protection against litigation, rather than as an intent to litigate. Thus mere existence of a patent, without a claim of infringement, is not sufficient reason to warrant exclusion from the Ubuntu Project."
"We haven't come to a legal conclusion that is pat enough for us to make the decision to take mono out."
[source]
  • 0

PHP is a good language ! (obviously people talking negative about it have not used it or find it hard to even begin to understand the power php and use has) but it is server side so you would be looking more at web development.. rather then C# I would look at java as it is the language of tomorrow its growing so much and is multi platform

  • 0

I think this article, albeit long, sums up PHP pretty nicely.

http://me.veekun.com...-of-bad-design/

the person who wrote that "article" has about as much credibility as a cats anus. PHP is a good web development language I know more then just PHP (which that BS article suggests) I Have been using PHP since I was 15 and now at university getting top grades in computer programming and web programming aswell as owning a web development company along with being a developing professional so Please next time you post something which insults my line of work please understand just because you dont like it and cant comprehend it does not mean others are the same way.

  • 0

the person who wrote that "article" has about as much credibility as a cats anus. PHP is a good web development language I know more then just PHP (which that BS article suggests) I Have been using PHP since I was 15 and now at university getting top grades in computer programming and web programming aswell as owning a web development company along with being a developing professional so Please next time you post something which insults my line of work please understand just because you dont like it and cant comprehend it does not mean others are the same way.

You took that way too personally. If you disagree, that's fine. But I won't stop posting things like this just because it might offend you (or others). Next time, might I suggest pointing out what's wrong with the article rather than going on a rant? You don't have to debunk the entire article, just pointing out a few false facts or inaccuracies will do plenty to diminish the credibility of the article and help others to think differently about it.

  • 0

You took that way too personally. If you disagree, that's fine. But I won't stop posting things like this just because it might offend you (or others). Next time, might I suggest pointing out what's wrong with the article rather than going on a rant? You don't have to debunk the entire article, just pointing out a few false facts or inaccuracies will do plenty to diminish the credibility of the article and help others to think differently about it.

it wasnt so much the article and you posting it more you agreeing with everything but yes you are right I am sorry. I pointed out the key insulting thing where the article basically says anyone who learns and goes forward with PHP does not know anything else...

he also says that PHP does not have advanced error checking, this is false there is a way to get it but its add on to your libary.. while there is still alot of php I do not know with the amount I do know I can do almost anything the language is capable of doing...

is it bad there is 100 ways to do one thing in php? and 100 ways to write the same code with the same end result? no it allows a more people with different mind sets and thought patterns to use the code rather then there be one way only to do something..

he also complains about settings if this and that is turned off it wont work... he needs a clap and a half thats the point of being able to turn it off!

this guy obviously knows about PHP but does not understand it at all he read the documentation it made him rage and he hates any body smarter then him (so anyone who can do php) I dont care if someone hates PHP loads of people i learn and get taught by hate it but his article is not a side of a story and opinion he fills it with false facts or tries to make true things sound like they are one sided..

  • 0

this guy obviously knows about PHP but does not understand it at all he read the documentation it made him rage and

The article is very long and quite extensive. I don't see how you can write it off so easily.

he hates any body smarter then him

Given that the author seems to know a lot about the subject, and you're just flying off the handle for absolutely no reason...

PHP isn't perfect, although it sounds like this is news to you. Take a look at Django (Python) or ASP.NET (C#) to see why PHP is so awful. I love me some Django.

  • 0

The article is very long and quite extensive. I don't see how you can write it off so easily.

Given that the author seems to know a lot about the subject, and you're just flying off the handle for absolutely no reason...

PHP isn't perfect, although it sounds like this is news to you. Take a look at Django (Python) or ASP.NET (C#) to see why PHP is so awful. I love me some Django.

I read the whole thing.. and I know it is not the best and needs some updating I know what I am talking about I may not be grande master PHP wizard but I clearly know alot more about the benefits then him ... and just because he can read documentation does not mean he knows what he is talking about he used some code which is viable code and some which is just a different way of writing one thing ... and I am happy with my php and java thanks (not that I have not looked at them I have looked at every one but preferred these) you are entitled to your opinion about php and if you think its crap then cool but that guy who wrote the article knows nothing and he then gave loads of arguments which he tried to justify why PHP is not needed or is used and It was just a load of hog

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the way that you framed it incorrectly. You wrote: "The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install" There's no "constant need to close all browser sessions". That's factually incorrect. The browser downloads its updates in the background and installs them when you open it again. Silently. And there's no "wait for a new version to install", updates are small and take 2-3 extra seconds AT MOST, if any. If you have an SSD, there's zero extra time. Also, every mainstream browser operates this way. Firefox, the FOSS go-to browser, the default on almost every Linux distro, does exactly the same. Also, you don't need to constantly restart Edge for updates to install, you can completely ignore them and it doesn't even ask you to handle them, it's all silent and automatic. So I don't understand what else do you want.
    • DuRoBo Krono Review: Portable E-Ink reader with great ideas that need a bit of improvement by Taras Buria Phone-sized e-readers are gaining traction these days, with more people treating them as a getaway device to cure phone addiction (or at least they are trying to) or having a more pocket-friendly reader that is easier to carry and hold. The market now has plenty of such readers to choose from, and DuRoBo is the latest addition, a new player that offers a more interesting approach to the idea. The Krono is a $279 e-reader with an interesting twist, which tries to make the device more fun and ergonomic. Here is my review. Disclaimer: DuRoBo provided the review sample without any editorial input or pre-approval. The Krono comes in a phone-sized box with pink accents. Inside, you get the device itself, a short user manual, and a USB cable. The cable is a bit old-fashioned, Type-A to Type-C, which is a bit disappointing. Hot take: I would rather have no cable in the box rather than another Type-A cable that gets immediately thrown into my box full of similar cables I never use. The Krono also has no charger in the box, as it relies on accessories you already own, which is fine with me. Here are the specs: Dimensions 154 x 80 x 9.0 mm or 6.06" x 3.15" x 0.35" 173 g or 6.10 oz Materials Black or White plastic Display 6.13-inch E-Ink Carta 1200, 1,648 x 824 pixels, 300 ppi Touch-capacitive. Dual-tone frontlight. Processor 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (QTI SM6350) 2 performance cores at 2.07 GHz 4 efficiency cores at 1.71 GHz Memory 6 GB Storage 128GB, non-expandable ~104GB available out-of-the-box Operating system Android 15 with a custom launcher Connectivity Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Battery 3,950 mAh battery Buttons and port USB Type-C port Power button, Volume button, Smart Dial Breathing Lights Audio Mono Speaker and Dual microphones In the box The Krono, a Type-A to Type-C cable, user manual Price $279 on Amazon First impressions Right off the bat, no, this is not a phone replacement. Do not approach this device thinking it can serve you as a dumb phone to cure your TikTok addiction. In addition to the fact that the Krono has no cellular connectivity, I strongly believe that no amount of extra devices can fix your phone addiction until you put some serious effort into it. The Krono is a phone-sized e-reader, a companion for your phone dedicated to reading without distractions. The DuRoBo Krono is made of plastic with a very fine texture. It is hardly premium, but I also cannot say it feels cheap. The device is also a bit thick, quite dense, and well-built without rattling or cracking. You get to choose between two colors: white and black. The front has quite thick bezels, which is hardly surprising for an e-ink device. These things use front light, with LEDs usually placed on the screen perimeter. While I do not mind thicker bezels, the notably larger chin cheapens the look a little. What I mind is a notable seam between the display and the main case, which, after just two days of use, collected plenty of dust and specks. The back of the Krono is what makes the device stand out. There is a cylinder (DuRoBo calls it the Axis) embedded in the back of the reader, housing three elements: a power button on the right edge, a Smart Dial on the left edge, and "Breathing Lights" on the back. An etched DuRoBo logo sits below the cylinder, and it is the only piece of branding you can find on the device. Overall, the design and materials are very unassuming, but the cylinder with additional control elements certainly elevates the look and makes it more interesting. Other physical elements include two microphones (one on the top edge and one on the bottom edge), a USB Type-C port, a volume rocker, and a single mono speaker. There is no fingerprint reader, so if you want to protect your device, a PIN is your only option. The official TPU case is not the most premium-looking Display The Krono has a 6.1-inch E-Ink Carta 1200 touchscreen display with a resolution of 1,648 x 824 pixels (300 ppi). The display is front-lit, and you can adjust the brightness and temperature from cool to warm. Unfortunately, the Krono lacks automatic brightness and temperature adjustments, and you cannot set a custom schedule for the frontlight. However, you can set it to always enable frontlight so that you can see what is happening on the screen when turning it on in a dark environment. On the bright side (get it?), the front light can get extremely dim so that the screen is barely readable in a pitch-dark room. The front light is also uniform across the screen, with no noticeable temperature gradients. I am very susceptible to uneven front light, and it is very easy for me to notice it, but the Krono is doing a very good job in this area. I also like that the edge shadow is not very prominent and barely visible in the black variant. E-Ink Carta 1200 is not the newest generation (there are Carta 1250 and 1300), but it is still a good display. It supports three modes: Clarity, Speed, and Quality. In Clarity mode, text is very sharp and easy to read, but you trade that for more ghosting, a slower refresh rate, and more artifacts when the display changes images. Speed mode, as the name suggests, boosts refresh rate and reduces ghosting, but fine print and text become more jagged. Finally, Quality mode is only available in Android apps. It has the lowest refresh rate, but in return, you get much better visuals, improved gradients, and more. Like brightness and temperature, you can toggle modes from the control center. It is available when swiping from the top-right corner of the screen (the top-left is for notifications). I also like that the Krono can work as a desk clock when not in use. It has a bunch of screensavers, including horizontal clocks with time, date, and current battery level. The screen refreshes once per minute, and battery drain is extremely low (not even 1% in 24 hours). It is a great use of the technology, and another thing I wish more e-ink devices featured. Smart Dial The Smart Dial is Krono's main party trick. It sits on the left side of the device and serves multiple purposes. You can twist or press it to perform various actions, depending on the current use case scenario. When reading books, twisting the dial flips through pages, and pressing it refreshes the screen. On the home screen, the dial adjusts the brightness, and holding the dial pressed launches voice note recording. Finally, a quick double press launches the DuRoBo AI chatbot. While the dial scroll is not notched, it is very smooth and has haptic feedback that confirms your actions, which feels very nice. As a long-term Apple Watch user, I love the idea behind the dial. It feels very natural and oddly satisfying to use, especially with that subtle haptic feedback. I never liked flipping pages with touch input, and I strongly believe each e-reader should come with some sort of physical controls for turning pages. The Krono has both volume buttons (which also work as page turners) and the dial, so you are free to use whichever you prefer. With that said, the dial is not perfect. For one, it sticks out of the case way too far for my liking, raising concerns about durability and longevity when carrying the Krono around in a pocket (it is a pocket-sized device after all). Also, it has too much wobble, which cheapens the experience and makes it feel a bit flimsy and unsecured. While there are two plastic guards on the Krono's case, they are way too small for any kind of protection. I also think DuRoBo should let users customize dial actions (the only available customization is scroll direction), particularly for long and double presses. Not everyone needs voice notes, and DuRoBo AI does not work without an active internet connection, leaving the long press essentially useless when offline. I do not mind these features, and I genuinely think they are useful, but I would rather have the ability to toggle between screen modes, turn the frontlight on/off, or launch my favorite app. I also agree with people on Reddit asking developers to let users adjust the dial sensitivity. I hope this is something DuRoBo can implement with a software update to make the experience more personalized (it is a Smart Dial, after all) and incentivize users to fiddle with the Dial more often. The Dial is a fantastic idea, so please, guys, improve it a little. As for ergonomics, they are mostly fine, but the dial's position may feel a little awkward and way too high. When I use a phone or a phone-sized gadget, I tend to rest one of its corners on my palm for a more secure grip. With the Krono, such a grip is impossible because you cannot reach the dial even with big hands. You have to lower the reader a bit and hold it like a bottle without any extra support for the bottom edge. Such a grip is not necessarily uncomfortable (the Krono is also light enough for it), but it requires a bit of muscle retraining. Sometimes, I do not bother with the dial and hold the Krono like my phone, flipping through pages with volume buttons, as they are perfectly positioned for my right-hand thumb. Interestingly, when testing the Krono, I would often find myself thinking that a roller embedded in the long plastic cylinder on the back of the device would have been a much more comfortable solution. There is a free idea for you, guys. Software The Krono runs Android 15 with a very minimal launcher on top. The home screen presents you with a list of apps, a scrollable list of widgets, and your user profile. Widgets can display time, calendar, or recent books for quick access. You can also add or remove apps from the home screen to keep the most useful stuff around without tapping "Apps." I like this minimalistic approach; it looks clean, easy to understand, and light. I understand that some may find the list of all apps way too clean, but fortunately, DuRoBo lets you switch to traditional icons. The reader also has a bunch of preinstalled apps: Read: The default app for reading. Browser: A Chromium-based browser. Files: A simple file manager. Music: A simple music player. Spark: A voice recorder with transcription support and AI summarization DuRoBo AI: A built-in AI chatbot. Transfer: An app for file transfer over Wi-Fi. If that is not enough, there is the Google Play Store, where you can download all the extra apps you need, alternative readers, podcast apps, chatbots, and more. DuRoBo is not trying to give you an all-in-one device. The standard software experience is quite minimal, which makes it easy to approach and learn. The standard reader supports EPUB, EPUB3, AZW3, MOBI, PDF, TXT, DOC, and DOCX, which is more than enough to let you read most books without third-party software. As for customizing the reading experience, you can select one of five built-in fonts, adjust size and thickness, adjust margins and spacing (only three variants for each), change text alignment and direction, toggle the reading status bar, and switch to dark mode. There is also text-to-speech, which utilizes Android's default TTS tech. While I like the simplistic approach, I cannot help but feel DuRoBo could have made the built-in reader a bit more customizable. However, I am not going to bog down on this, as you can always install any other reader you prefer using the Play Store or by sideloading an APK. Getting books to the Krono is very simple. Given that the device is an Android smartphone without cellular connectivity, you can transfer files via a USB Type-C cable, download them using the built-in browser, share them over Bluetooth, or use cloud storage. My favorite was the built-in Transfer app. It is simple, reliable, and very well-designed. I was surprised by how well-designed the web portal is. It is fast, pretty, and properly categorized. Well done! Once you have your books loaded, you can highlight or underline text, add annotations, bookmark pages, check the table of contents, and ask AI about the selected text. Unfortunately, the Krono has no built-in vocabulary, but again, that is something a third-party reader could fix. Overall, the built-in reader is light and snappy, with just the minimum amount of features for a regular user to enjoy reading books. The Krono has no built-in reading tracking, so stat nerds will have to look for third-party reading apps. However, you can set a daily reading goal, and the reader will notify you when you reach it (for example, one hour). You can also set a reminder to read at a certain time, and when the time comes, the Krono will light up its back LEDs and unlock itself to nudge you. Other than that, the rear LEDs do nothing, not even showing charging progress, which is an unfortunate misopportunity if you ask me. Quirks aside, Krono's Android runs quite snappily and bug-free. Early reviews of the Krono criticized its Android 13-based software quite a lot, but now, the reader runs Android 15, and its software has fixed plenty of initial complaints. I never experienced any issues with built-in apps. AI attempts The DuRoBo Krono comes with a built-in AI chatbot. There is no information on what model powers this thing, but the system says it was "trained by Google." You can launch the bot from the app list or by double-pressing the dial. It works just like any other chatbot, and you can ask it anything by typing or using voice input. The AI saves your chats, and you can rename, export, or delete them. DuRoBo AI requires an active internet connection, and it does not work offline. Its reach and capabilities are also limited. You can only chat in the app and use it in the reader app as a makeshift vocabulary. However, the implementation is kinda awkward. You can only send a selected portion of text to AI without giving it any requests or instructions. I highlighted the word "dumb," and it apologized to me for not being useful. You also cannot ask follow-up questions or send the generated response to a separate chat. The chatbot is also slow, even with fast Wi-Fi, making the overall experience quite frustrating, which makes me again wish for the ability to remap the double press to something else. Spark, the standard voice recording app, also uses AI for note summarization and transcribing. Neither feature works offline, unfortunately. Spark records notes up to 30 minutes using Krono's dual microphones, and you can rename or export notes. Transcription quality is decent, and the speed is alright, but you can find much better solutions in the Google Play Store. What I like about Spark is that transcribed notes are not locked, and you can always type more to elaborate on your ideas, which is handy. Overall, I like that the Krono is not shoving AI down my throat, but to be honest, there is really not that much to shove. AI features here feel raw and need improvements to be more useful. Battery Life Like most E-Ink readers, the Krono has fantastic battery life. Even with a clock as a screensaver, its standby power consumption is incredibly low. And when in use, you can get weeks of reading on a single charge. Without the front light, my unit never sipped more than one or two percent of battery during a one-hour reading session. It was nice to see plenty of battery-related settings. You can limit charging at 80% to protect battery health long-term, check the number of charging cycles, manufacturing/first-time use date, battery health, and the maximum capacity. Additionally, the Krono lets you select what hardware remains enabled when sleeping. This lets you keep Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on (say, if you want to receive notifications, for some reason) and keep audio playing when locked. Turning these features off effectively eliminates any standby battery drain. I left my Krono sitting for 24 hours with a clock screensaver on, and it did not drop a single percent. The pretty big 3,950 mAh battery justifies the device's thickness and ensures you do not have to charge it for long periods. Speaking of charging, it is capped at only 10W, which is a bit disappointing, as getting such a big battery to 100% takes a notably long time in the era of super-fast charging smartphones. DuRoBo Moodi The Moodi is a standalone, optional accessory for your Krono. It is a wireless remote with two customizable buttons that you can use to flip pages, control media, or scroll webpages. The accessory connects via Bluetooth. Despite having a built-in rechargeable battery, it is extremely light. While the Moodi's shape and form factor is not what I would call particularly ergonomic, it is not uncomfortable to hold and use. The Moodi comes with six removable magnetic buttons with various smiley faces. Buttons sit securely, and they have nice-feeling, albeit a little loud, clicks. It is a cute touch that adds a little more fun and character to the device. There is also an accented power button and a single status LED. The latter displays charging status and connection mode. The Moodi supports three modes: Reading: Buttons work as volume buttons, allowing you to flip pages in the built-in reader or other apps that support page turning with volume buttons. Media: Buttons work as skip forward/backward, which is useful when listening to audiobooks, podcasts, or music. Scroll: The third mode lets you scroll pages in the web browser or any other application The Krono properly detects the Moodi and presents you with an on-screen guide when you connect it for the first time (it also displays the battery level). However, you can only change modes by holding both buttons for a few seconds. It is also worth noting that the Moodi works with other devices. I connected it to my iPhone and it let me adjust volume or control media playback. Sadly, the scroll did not work, so you cannot use it to waste time scrolling TikToks. Overall, the Moodi is a cute little accessory, which I can recommend for those who read a lot. It is very useful for remote page flipping when you do not want to burden your hands by holding the Krono all the time. I only wish DuRoBo included a lanyard for the built-in loop. As for the battery life, after using the Moodi for a few days, I only managed to drop several percent of its 90 mAh battery. Despite the small size, it is rated for weeks of use, which is pretty impressive. At $35.99, I cannot say the Moodi is a must-have accessory, but I see the appeal. I prefer using the Krono with its Smart Dial, as I rarely read for more than 40-60 minutes in one sitting. However, if you have a stand and like reading for long periods, the Moodi is the right thing to have. It is a bit more expensive than regular page flippers on Amazon, but it is on par with similar products from Kobo or BOOX. Plus, it has a little more fun to it with removable buttons and better integration into the Krono. Conclusion At the end of the day, DuRoBo Krono is a nice pocket-sized e-reader. Its software focuses on the main things without trying to be everything at once. The smart dial idea is unique and great, and I wish more manufacturers had something similar in their devices. The display is also good, with an even frontlight and "always-on" support. I did not notice any deal-breaking issues with the Krono. However, you can feel that the idea needs some improvements, such as a slightly stiffer dial in a more ergonomic location, perhaps a little more premium materials, and better software customization. I hope the company won't give up on the idea and improve the dial and ergonomics in the second generation. Buy DuRoBo Krono Black - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Krono White - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Moodi - $35.99 on Amazon As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • In what way is any of what I said incorrect? To install an update you need to close all browser instances, upping it from once a month to once a fortnight is an inconvenience for users. Particularly when updates don't offer functionality that users want (notably copilot). Security updates should come as they are needed, not on a release schedule
    • Dopamine 3.0.6 by Razvan Serea Dopamine is an awesome free audio player which tries to make organizing and listening to music as simple and pretty as possible. Dopamine has been designed for Windows 7, Windows 8.x and Windows 10 and plays mp3, ogg vorbis, flac, wma and m4a/aac music formats quite well. The best part? It's created by long-time Neowin member, Raphaël Godart. If you’re looking for a music player to handle a large music collection, you should definitely give Dopamine a try. Dopamine 3.0.6 changelog: Fixed Manually edited album covers are overwritten on the next collection refresh Fixed AppImage package not working on modern GNU/Linux distributions Deleting song from playlist sometimes fails Playback controls only work when clicking on upper half of the buttons It's unclear that files must be tagged with an external ReplayGain scanner (for example rsgain) before normalization can take effect. Change to Artist or Album tags is not reflected in the song list view nor in the Now Playing information ReplayGain issues Smart playlist filters ignore text containing accents or other special characters Some MP3 files trigger an "MPEG header not found" error due to a too-narrow initial MPEG header scan range Changed Updated the Vietnamese translation Download: Dopamine 3.0.6 | 122.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Home Page | Forum Discussion | Screenshot | Other OSes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      96
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!