Recommended Posts

I tried Firefox HA mode and it just make Firefox dramatically slowed down. The UI rendering is so laggy and the web rendering of youtube when scrolling is considerable laggy too. Firefox renders and scrolls youtube fine when HA is off. IE9 renders youtube normally so can anyone explain the reason Firefox is so horrible at it? Or why bother with HA at all if it doesn't actually render Firefox faster?

Well, it might be due to several reason, I personally also victim of it so I am not gonna defend Firefox but you can do several things to reduce impact of Hardware Acceleration.

1) Update your driver

2) Tweaking settings in about:config

Also can you tell me your addons list, might be some addon making your UI so slow. Firefox improved a lot since FF7 onward. FF13 is quite snappier than any earlier version.

Well, it might be due to several reason, I personally also victim of it so I am not gonna defend Firefox but you can do several things to reduce impact of Hardware Acceleration.

1) Update your driver

2) Tweaking settings in about:config

Also can you tell me your addons list, might be some addon making your UI so slow. Firefox improved a lot since FF7 onward. FF13 is quite snappier than any earlier version.

My addons are of the usual ones like adblockplus, greasemonkey,firebug,flashgot,User Style Manager, etc. I set my graphic driver to be updated automatically so it shouldn't be a problem. Firefox feels pretty snappy with HA off, so it must be their HA mode that slow it down.

What setting are you refering to in the config?

It's because FF HA mode is still young and hasn't matured hence why software mode works much better they've done all they can to make it fast and stable now it's time to try using something other than the CPU alot of browsers that are starting out with GPU acceleration are having problems with either speed or stability or both and like anything new it takes time to become good

I'm running a laptop with C2D T9300 and Nvidia 8600M GS with latest driver 296.10.

Today there are chances of new driver release, so make sure to update. I personally had issues with 296.10 so I am using currently 301.40 and it is much better than 296.10. Also new driver will be from same branch as 301.40.

Also should I suggest you once try Nightly for a while and tell us whether you feel any difference?

I was reading the Opera release thread and apparently they are offering both OpenGL and DirectX options. Is it posible that Mozilla could do the same? DirectX seems to be superior at doing HA in IE9 compare to OpenGL in Firefox. Does anyone have a lead on Mozilla HA's developement?

Firefox's hardware acceleration already uses DirectX (Has since 4.0), OpenGL isn't used by default because a bunch of cheap cards have either terrible or no support for it.

I've got a GTX 570 with full OpenGL support for the latest version, but Firefox still doesn't use it.

Firefox HWA is terrible because, (research! "lurksearch" {tm})

  1. Developers focus on Smart Phone Version
  2. Developers focus on Panorama, Smooth WebM playback and other things of little value.
  3. Developers do not have any way to test D3D10 performance for some reason, otherwise they would know it is slow.
  4. Most Developers use Macs.
  5. Aside from a developer called Bas, I don't know anyone who talks about Windows HWA.
  6. Developer's solution to Windows HWA problems is a BLACKLIST.
  7. Last performance improvement for HWA was Azure in FF7 which does NOTHING for helping YouTube, tab scrolling, etc.
  8. I also heard that a lot of rendering that is supposed to be accelerated falls back to software for GUI.
  9. They probably just don't care.

I was reading the Opera release thread and apparently they are offering both OpenGL and DirectX options. Is it posible that Mozilla could do the same? DirectX seems to be superior at doing HA in IE9 compare to OpenGL in Firefox. Does anyone have a lead on Mozilla HA's developement?

Well, Firefox already offer both Hardware Acceleration but Skia backend (OpenGL) can only turned on for canvas hardware acceleration. Azure Content Acceleration will be Nightly (FF15) turned, which is better than Cairo backend but it still uses Cairo as a backend but it is still better.

  • 11 months later...

Firefox HWA is terrible because, (research! "lurksearch" {tm})

  1. Developers focus on Smart Phone Version
  2. Developers focus on Panorama, Smooth WebM playback and other things of little value.
  3. Developers do not have any way to test D3D10 performance for some reason, otherwise they would know it is slow.
  4. Most Developers use Macs.
  5. Aside from a developer called Bas, I don't know anyone who talks about Windows HWA.
  6. Developer's solution to Windows HWA problems is a BLACKLIST.
  7. Last performance improvement for HWA was Azure in FF7 which does NOTHING for helping YouTube, tab scrolling, etc.
  8. I also heard that a lot of rendering that is supposed to be accelerated falls back to software for GUI.
  9. They probably just don't care.

I agree, when I used firefox on a linux recovery disk, it runs so much smoother than the windows version.Also firefox has a page where they classify the various versions, the classification affects how much dev focus it gets. Its notable that the windows version of firefox is not in the top classification.Trying to find the url now with the info but I found this out when looking for why is no 64bit windows version and then discovered because they dont treat windows as that important.Its sad but they consider mobile platforms and even metro as more important than 64bit windows desktop version.http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9234997/Mozilla_compromises_on_x64_Firefox_after_user_backlashLinux and even mac os (a OS I consider irrelevant on desktop) have 64bit firefox. For whatever reason firefox dev's treat windows as a 2nd class OS.Firefox is probably my most power hungry app, it draws mroe resources from my PC than even some games, right now its using 1.1gig of ram and a 32bit version can only address 2 gig. It also crashes often and slows down a lot, I remain curious if these issues would be resolved with a 64bit version, as now days a browser is not just for web pages, its used as a launcher for apps and multimedia.On the Hw acceleration this is highlighted a lot.Firefox 3 using software rendering runs very smooth, but of course it doesnt support many of today's modern web features. However if disabling hw acceleration in firefox 20 (or any new version) the software mode is slower than it was in firefox 3's day because it now has no focus on it plus features are been added that bog it down. Hardware mode is smooth if the 3d card is moderatly powerful and isnt throttled back. using firefox puts a lot of load on my nvidia card, it hits high temperatures and is often on 3d clocks, it I use an app to force the card to stay in 2d idle mode (which Ie can handle) firefox becomes jerk city, it struggles to even scroll pages like neowin forums. It is extremely power hungry and clearly not very optimised.See this alsohttp://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/11/64-bit-firefox-for-windows-should-be-prioritized-not-suspended/Here is the link for dev priority, found it. Windows 64 tier 3. linux 64 tier 1.https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Supported_build_configurations

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!