Gaming setup, high-end(budget)


Recommended Posts

Specs :PROCESSOR : CORE I3 2100 @ 3.1GHZ

MOTHERBOARD : ECS H61H2-M2 B3 -

RAM : GENERIC 4GB DDR3 1333MHZ

VIDEO CARD : SAPPHIRE HD 7850

POWERSUPPLY : CORSAIR VX550W / HEC RAPTER II 600W

CASING : Aerocool (VS3 Advanced)

my budget is up to $620(26300 philippine peso-converted to usd)

3. I'll use it for gaming purposes, playing @max settings

4. 19" widescreen LED @1360x768 ; not planning to SLI/Xfire

5. I'm buying this June

6. I'll be overclocking.... overclocking my GPU only.

7. Where? oh i plan to buy in my country, philippines

8. No extra features, the build has it all.

Im planning to downgrade the Wattage of my psu to 430W-460W , will it be capable?

please recommend me some PSU manufacturers so I can base on them.

oh, and one more thing, I'm choosing among these 3 cards : GTX 560 ti, GTX 560 ti 448, HD 6950 and HD 7850 what do you recommend among these 3?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078563-gaming-setup-high-endbudget/
Share on other sites

So what exactly is "high end" ?

I feel stupid for even posting on this thread because I think I just fell for a joke.

Then don't even post on such topic, you're not helping either !

@OP !

Don't compromise on PSU ! use at least 500W PSU !

& you didn't mentioned the Graphic Cards in detail, there's so many varities of HD 7850 & HD 6950,

anyway, check which one is 256Bit with DDR5 memory.

  • Like 2

Go with at least a 500 watt PSU and theGTX 560 Ti 448. You should be fine if you plan on gaming up to 1680 x 1050, although in some games you may have to leave MSAA off; such as BF3. Also I'm not a fan of that motherboard, but I guess it should suite your needs.

So what exactly is "high end" ?

I feel stupid for even posting on this thread because I think I just fell for a joke.

we'll im sorry if my "high-end" doesn't meet your "high-end" standards

it would be better if you helped me out a bit rather than posting useless comments..

thanks for reading my "joke" thread.

Then don't even post on such topic, you're not helping either !

@OP !

Don't compromise on PSU ! use at least 500W PSU !

& you didn't mentioned the Graphic Cards in detail, there's so many varities of HD 7850 & HD 6950,

anyway, check which one is 256Bit with DDR5 memory.

thanks..

and oh... yeah there are many varieties of those cards but i based on the reference cards, the original ones...

sorry,, i forgot to mention that earlier..

thanks for the reply, i appreciate it much.

Go with at least a 500 watt PSU and theGTX 560 Ti 448. You should be fine if you plan on gaming up to 1680 x 1050, although in some games you may have to leave MSAA off; such as BF3. Also I'm not a fan of that motherboard, but I guess it should suite your needs.

that's a relief to hear.. thanks for the reply.

Go with H67 if possible instead of H61 for a motherboard.

Or better yet, Z77.

Also, do give the i5-K (either 2500K or 3570K) serious consideration - while a lot of games don't take advantage of multiple cores, the operating systems definitely do.

Chipsets to *avoid* : P67. Why? Motherboards based on P67 not only cost more than Z68, they also cost more than Z77, which I simply cannot forgive.

I also concur with the poster that suggests GDDR5, at least 1 GB of it, and a 256-bit bus (alternative - 128-bit bus) for a gaming GPU. However, in addition to the nVIdia 550/560, add the AMD HD68xx/78xx to the list as well.

If its possible you can save more money for it itll future proof you alot better. ive put together this, it in english pounds off 1 site. Shopping on multiple sites will give you the best deals.

Gigabyte H61MA-D3V Intel H61 (Socket 1155), ?48, give you 2 sata 6, 2x usb 3 ports and PCIe 3.0

Intel Core i5-3450 3.10GHz (Ivybridge) - ?150

Corsair XMS3 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 PC3-10666C9 1333MHz, ?40, its best to go with 8GB over 4GB for games just to make sure your not running out of ram etc

Corsair Builder Series CX 600W V2 '80 Plus' Power Supply - ?53

Aerocool VS-3 Advance Midi Tower Case - ?35, looks quite cool actually :D

MSI HD 7850 Power Edition Twin Frozr IV OC 2048MB - ?220 or

Sapphire HD 7850 2048MB - ?200, Id prolly be more inclined to go with sapphire on a personal peference but like AMD or nividia to different brands. Its mostly personal preference

Cost = ?545 or ?525 pending on gfx card

if i did your specs of

i3 2120, ?92

4Gb ram (OCZ Platinum 77720 timings, only a few pounds more than other ram), ?27

500 watt corsair builder PSU (miinmum you want really) ?45

Total cost, ?466

TYou could save a bit more money by going with the 6950 which are still very good cards

Sapphire HD 6950 OC "Dual Fan Edition" 2048MB - ?150

Total cost on the cheaper system would be ?397

on the more expensive system would be ?475 - ?495 depending on which of the 2 7850's you would go for

You could change your ram to 1600Mhz as some only costs a few pounds more than the 1333Mhz ones, not sure if youll see much difference though

Hope that helps ya

So what exactly is "high end" ?

I feel stupid for even posting on this thread because I think I just fell for a joke.

this is high end depending on where you are in the world. In the phillipines, this computer is 3-4 months salary. It would be the same as you buying a 6,000 dollar pc.

this is high end depending on where you are in the world. In the phillipines, this computer is 3-4 months salary. It would be the same as you buying a 6,000 dollar pc.

High end isn't compared using currencies, it's compared in performance...in general terms. Sure, the cost may make it high end to you, but in terms of technologies available, it isn't high end.

High end gaming machines are Core i7-2600K, GeForce 560Ti and 8GB of RAM or above processor wise in the current age of technology

i would say for a gaming rig high end would be i5-2500k and above seeing as it is widely recognized as the best processor for gaming. the i7's hyperthreading isnt needed for gaming in fact the i5 is under utilized plus it overclocks really well. A high end gaming rig would have some of the latest gfx tech rather than having the best processor you can buy as the games use the GPU far more than the CPU.

Exactly -

I laugh because OP says "high end" yet mentions specs that are budget - and some people are all "well its alot in the Philip..."

I dont care where he is - Core i3 is NOT high end. I am not being ethnocentric to my fat, lazy rich american ideals.

If you'll excuse me I have to go to drop $100 to fill up my SUV...

*Disclaimer - author does not own an SUV & it cost $50 to fill up his car*

I totally agree with the high end comments. You don't want an i3, sure it's a great processor, but it's a core component of the build. Do not cheap out. I would sacrifice a little GPU power for more CPU power, as your monitor is a lower resolution. I would go for the i5 2500 at least, and a GTX 560 (Ti, if possible).

high end is high end true, but to each its different. To some, i5 is a joke.. You call it high end but its garbage low end to weather machines and architectural rendering offices with mainframes, and even pixar graphics production machines. Since this guy is in the phillipines, its high end for him.

high end is high end true, but to each its different. To some, i5 is a joke.. You call it high end but its garbage low end to weather machines and architectural rendering offices with mainframes, and even pixar graphics production machines. Since this guy is in the phillipines, its high end for him.

Hey ---- you sound like that Einstein guy or whatever his name was -- he said something like "its all relative" - :wacko:

the i3-2120 offers the best bang for the buck right now if you ask me as it's only $115-125 and holds up well against some of the higher end CPU's when it comes to gaming abilities.

but basically that CPU should AT LEAST hold out until the next gen consoles arrive as it can comfortably run any game out there right now if paired with a decent GPU.

You don't want an i3, sure it's a great processor, but it's a core component of the build. Do not cheap out. I would sacrifice a little GPU power for more CPU power, as your monitor is a lower resolution. I would go for the i5 2500 at least, and a GTX 560 (Ti, if possible).

as far as games go... i am pretty sure right now it would make more sense to get that CPU (i3-2120) along with a fairly fancy graphics card because i don't think much can max out a i3-2120 CPU as far as games go as from what i been reading it seems like most games right now like a fast dual core more than a slower quad core basically.

only reason to go quad core right now for games is basically down the road when the next gen consoles arrive as i suspect then is when games will start the process of needing quite a bit more power to run well again as it seems lately most CPU's that are not TOO old can still play games on them comfortably and with the i3-2120 being the best dual core CPU out there it should be good for a while especially considering the $$$ you spend on it and by the time it starts struggling to run games you could just upgrade to something better anyways.

plus with it being dual core it's better on power consumption to which is a bonus.

Then don't even post on such topic, you're not helping either !

@OP !

Don't compromise on PSU ! use at least 500W PSU !

& you didn't mentioned the Graphic Cards in detail, there's so many varities of HD 7850 & HD 6950,

anyway, check which one is 256Bit with DDR5 memory.

Why all the "!" ?

you're too high strung. Were you crying when you posted this ? :unsure:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!