UK Motor Insurance (Claim) question


Recommended Posts

So, my car was recently hit and both of the near-side doors have been damaged. It was parked at the time. The other driver assumes full responsibility and has told me that he would like to get it done via his insurance.

Now, my question is, will my insurance be affected in anyway? The reason I ask is because when one applies for insurance, it asks if the person has been in an accident in the last 5 years, regardless of fault.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078829-uk-motor-insurance-claim-question/
Share on other sites

Yes, it's ridiculous but since insurance is all about statistics and you've been involved in an accident - even though it wasn't your fault - you're now deemed a higher risk so your premium will go up. Impossible to say how much unfortunately but it obviously won't be as substantial as if you had a fault claim.

It shouldn't

The company are not paying out anything and you have not caused an accident

they tried to do this with me and i put a complaint in and threatened to go to the FSA

the apologised and claimed it was a system error

some more info

Your car insurance rates aren't necessarily going to increase at renewal time if you make a claim under your own insurance policy for an accident that wasn't your fault. Most laws prohibit insurers from surcharging policyholders or raising their premium rates for accidents in which they weren't at fault. However, those laws do not preclude your insurer from dumping your policy at renewal time if you've made a couple of recent claims. If you drive in a high-risk area and are subject to being hit, even if you are not at fault, your insurer might find you too high a risk to insure.

http://www.insure.com/car-insurance/third-party-accident.html

It shouldn't

The company are not paying out anything and you have not caused an accident they tried to do this with me and i put a complaint in and threatened to go to the FSA the apologised and claimed it was a system error

I don't believe that in the slightest. Your risk has changed because the vast majority of non-fault accidents could have been avoided by the non-fault party (you lane switch and pull out in front of somebody, they're at fault since they go into the back of you, but it still could have been avoided). Even though it's seemingly unfair, they're quite within their rights to charge what they like.

i had a no fault claim, went through my insurance and they claimed the money back from the other person's insurance (?500) my insurance has beehn about ?150 a year extra for 2 years now, only a three year window on declaring claims so next year will be my last extra high premium i hope.

i heard that for every ?1 of premiums the insurance companies got over the last few years they spent ?1.50 in claims, so any excuse to get more premium and they take it

best advice, get some quotes and speak to the guy to see if he wants to pay out of his own pocket, he and you will end up paying more back in premiums

If the accident was 100% not your fault, your insurance premiums won't go up, it cant, as you've done nothing wrong.

The person who caused the accident, their premiums go up as there now a hazard, with hazard up goes insurance.

So don't worry.

Have you informed your car insurance company? As I believe you have to, your fault or not

  • 3 weeks later...

If it helps, I was hit whilst parked, and although it was not my fault my premium was increased straight away untill the claim was settled as my insurers deemed both parties to be at fault automatically, Once the claim was settled my premium was reduced and as i was paying monthly at the time the direct debit reduced accordingly. It still appears on my claims history at renewal time, though as a no fault accident. Hope this helps.

If the accident was 100% not your fault, your insurance premiums won't go up, it cant, as you've done nothing wrong.

The person who caused the accident, their premiums go up as there now a hazard, with hazard up goes insurance.

So don't worry.

Have you informed your car insurance company? As I believe you have to, your fault or not

Err wrong, it's called a no claim bonus, not a no fault bonus. Too many people have this misconception..

Statistically, if you are involved in an accident, fault or not, you are more likely to be involved in another accident.. Therefore your premiums will go up.

Anecdotal evidence may, on occasion, prove this to not be the case but I is very much the exception to the rule.

Not at fault claims shouldn't raise your insurance one single red penny.

I recently had a run in with a deer, and because it wasn't my fault, my insurance will remain the same.

4 years ago, I had rear ended someone, and my insurance went up then.

What he **** did the deer do? Drive into you?? Haha

  • 4 weeks later...

I've had two accidents which were not 100% my fault and the other party accepted full liability. The difference in my premiums when I get quotes is approx ?150 per claim even when i point out it wasn't my fault.

Thats ?300 extra a year I have to pay more by declaring them than if I never mentioned it. I rung up and asked why this was, "statistically I am more at risk now I have had an accident"

I've had two accidents which were not 100% my fault and the other party accepted full liability. The difference in my premiums when I get quotes is approx ?150 per claim even when i point out it wasn't my fault.

Thats ?300 extra a year I have to pay more by declaring them than if I never mentioned it. I rung up and asked why this was, "statistically I am more at risk now I have had an accident"

In some ways they're right. How many accidents that are non-fault could be avoided if the 1st party was a bit more observant. Take switching lanes for example, you switch lanes in front of somebody and they go into the back of you, they're at fault, but it still could have been avoided by some observation on your part.

In some ways they're right. How many accidents that are non-fault could be avoided if the 1st party was a bit more observant. Take switching lanes for example, you switch lanes in front of somebody and they go into the back of you, they're at fault, but it still could have been avoided by some observation on your part.

I understand your point, however in my case first one was i got tboned at a junction. Women pulled out early into the side/front of me. Second one, a van went straight up the back of me when i was stopped to turn at a junction.

In this case I couldn't have been any more observant as I had done all that was required of me. Ah well, after 4 years driving I have it down to ?50/month instead of ?160 when i started.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!