Recommended Posts

A judge in Florida ruled on Tuesday that flashing one's headlights to warn other drivers of speed traps set by police is protected by the First Amendment.

Ryan Kintner of Lake Mary, Fla. was pulled over and cited by a police officer in an unmarked car for doing just that. Kintner was at home when he saw a deputy park along a street and being using his radar gun. He got in his car, drove a little ways away and parked his vehicle so he could flash his lights at oncoming traffic to warn them.

He was stopped shortly after doing so and fined $166 for "improper flashing of lights."

Kintner, however, was not going down without a fight. :) He took his case to court, suing the Seminole County Sheriff's Office, with Attorney J. Marcus Jones arguing that "You're completely in your rights to flash your headlights. Flashing your headlights is expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. By issuing a citation, monetary fine for that conduct you've breached the First Amendment rights."

The judge agreed that the officer misapplied a law meant to ban motorists from flashing after-market emergency lights and ruled that the law does not apply to people using headlights as a form of communication. Thus, the court decided, citing Kintner was, in fact, a violation of one of his Constitutionally-protected rights.

Jones has filed a similar suit in Tallahassee aimed at the entire Florida Highway Patrol, which has agreed to stop citing drivers for flashing their headlights until litigation is complete.

"This stuff is fun," said Jones after Tuesday's hearing.

source

  • Like 2

Imagine if that had been upheld. Drivers often warn other drivers of not only speed traps, but upcoming queues/problems/accidents (mainly lorry drivers). That's be a lot of people breaking the first amendment!

  • Like 1

I've run into this myself, I'm glad to hear he not only pushed back but one. Just another slimy way local city cops are looking to screw people over.

Frankly, it seems that new drivers today don't understand their civic duty to other drivers when they see speed traps like that.

  • 1 month later...

I can't believe someone was fined for this. I was driving my truck into town the other day to pickup a friend and I didn't have an inspection, but I saw someone flashing their headlights and was wondering what was going on... I get down the road to find a road check, luckily I drove slow and was able to turn into a subdivision right before it and turn around. People flash their lights around here to warn of road checks, speed radaring, accidents or maybe even a reckless or drunk driver. As soon as you see someone flash their lights, it's to signal you to proceed with caution and pay close attention to detail - It pretty much wakes you up.

If the argument that speed traps is to get people to slow down were to hold any water, the police wouldn't give a damn what the actual reason was for the slowing down, as long as the driver actually slowed down. The fact that the people giving the warnings are being censored tells us one thing: That the speed traps have nothing to do with safer driving and everything to do with making more money from fines.

  • Like 6

Well he could argue that he was warning drivers of a hazard ahead, slow down. After all a speed gun/camera etc is a hazard as people usually brake, even though they don't need to, just a natural reaction.

Could of even tried "I forgot where my window washer lever was" :p

but yer, he knew what he was doing and got raped for trying to help others, always happens to the nice people

'Civic duty', 'the nice people' ... seriously? I know this is hardly a new issue (nor am I going to end the discussion), but think of it this way: he was acting as a lookout for people engaged in illegal acts. That doesn't sound like civic duty to me.

  • Like 1

I've run into this myself, I'm glad to hear he not only pushed back but one. Just another slimy way local city cops are looking to screw people over.

Frankly, it seems that new drivers today don't understand their civic duty to other drivers when they see speed traps like that.

Civic duty? lol.

I personally never warn oncoming drivers on speed traps. You know the speed limit. You know the punishment if caught. You made the choice.

  • Like 2

'Civic duty', 'the nice people' ... seriously? I know this is hardly a new issue (nor am I going to end the discussion), but think of it this way: he was acting as a lookout for people engaged in illegal acts. That doesn't sound like civic duty to me.

How do you know those people were intent on committing illegal acts? I've nearly been caught out before simply because I wasn't watching my speed as it slowly increased over the speed limit. The civic duty here is reminding people to watch their speed and to avoid an accident by driving too fast, and to drive safely (after all, speed cameras are there to ensure that people are driving safely, and not just as a source of money right? Right?). It's not like every person on the road is a lead-footed death trap.

  • Like 2

How do you know those people were intent on committing illegal acts? I've nearly been caught out before simply because I wasn't watching my speed as it slowly increased over the speed limit. The civic duty here is reminding people to watch their speed and to avoid an accident by driving too fast, and to drive safely (after all, speed cameras are there to ensure that people are driving safely, and not just as a source of money right? Right?). It's not like every person on the road is a lead-footed death trap.

Intent has nothing to do with it. If you're not controlling your speed, that's your problem. (Yes, I drive, and I know it's not easy - but that doesn't really excuse it).

Civic duty would mean doing it all the time, not just when the person has a chance of being caught.He was doing it to save people from being caught by the police officer, not to save them from speeding.

And yes, speed cameras are used to prevent people from speeding. Amazingly, things can have more than one purpose. I don't agree with profit being a good purpose, but I'm not denying it might be a motivation. However, the main reason for having them is to prevent people from doing something dangerous and illegal.

  • Like 2

If the argument that speed traps is to get people to slow down were to hold any water, the police wouldn't give a damn what the actual reason was for the slowing down, as long as the driver actually slowed down. The fact that the people giving the warnings are being censored tells us one thing: That the speed traps have nothing to do with safer driving and everything to do with making more money from fines.

Or you know, it's the principle of random sampling.

Glassed Silver:mac

However, the main reason for having them is to prevent people from doing something dangerous and illegal.

But isn't that what this guy was also trying to do, less the conviction for motoring offences?

I usually flash my lights because I feel everyone should have a chance to correct their behaviour before being caught by traffic cops. If you want to continue speeding, fine by me, you deserve a ticket/fine then. Anyways, fines and tickets are all such a load of BS money making schemes, i have 0 respect for traffic cops, especially when I see how reckless and stupid they drive themselves. So i'll be damned if they get the upper hand..

I usually flash my lights because I feel everyone should have a chance to correct their behaviour before being caught by traffic cops. If you want to continue speeding, fine by me, you deserve a ticket/fine then. Anyways, fines and tickets are all such a load of BS money making schemes, i have 0 respect for traffic cops, especially when I see how reckless and stupid they drive themselves. So i'll be damned if they get the upper hand..

Traffic cops don't make the law - their behaviour has no bearing on whether people should be caught or not. (Obviously I do think police in any form should be paragons of society).

Civic duty? lol.

I personally never warn oncoming drivers on speed traps. You know the speed limit. You know the punishment if caught. You made the choice.

I completely agree. It's your own decision to speed, and by doing so you're endangering others (YES you are, even if you're a Nascar super-auto cross expert space ship g-force racer).

And it's your own fault if you slowly rise above the speed limit or don't realize you're speeding. You're driving a VEHICLE on a PUBLIC ROAD, you are responsible for your actions. You could kill someone, so you better be aware of what you're doing.

Now do I sometimes speed? Yep, but I go with the flow of the traffic (unless they're going more than 10 mph over). People typically drive 5 mph over, and that's became acceptable (heck, speed cameras only catch you for going 11 mph over). People who excessively speed need to be punished.

Traffic cops don't make the law - their behaviour has no bearing on whether people should be caught or not. (Obviously I do think police in any form should be paragons of society).

sure they don't make it, but most twist it or try to meet quotas for the month to make money. Then it comes down to them simply pulling you over or giving fines for pure BS.

sure they don't make it, but most twist it or try to meet quotas for the month to make money. Then it comes down to them simply pulling you over or giving fines for pure BS.

You got that right man. I find during the first 2 1/2 weeks of the month the cops are really understanding and slack. For the last 1 1/2 weeks the cops put the hammer down on absolutely everything and around here it's the only time that you'll see a road-check or anything like that. Another thing I noticed is that here we have our "Graduated Driver Licensing Program" it's also called the GDL program, and in that program you're required to wear a "G" decal regardless of what stage you are in for the 3 years that you have your license under that program. There are numerous restrictions on the first year, then the second year you pretty much have your full license and the 3rd year is a probationary period - The police take advantage of all this, because they can give tickets for no decal, past curfew e.t.c.

I would be willing to bet any amount of money that once the quota situation was removed, there would be a lot less tickets.

Do any of you (not surprisingly European) who are more worried about the 'unpunished' crime really think that ticket changes behavior or creates safer drivers? Especially when they aren't really targeting specific bad behaviors? (ie not all speeding is 'reckless', in fact not flowing with traffic is far more dangerous - which is really what most of these traps boil down to - a big game of red rover)

Civic duty? lol.

I personally never warn oncoming drivers on speed traps. You know the speed limit. You know the punishment if caught. You made the choice.

People like you should not be allowed to drive!

Sadly this almost doesn't happen in Ontario...nobody cares about other drivers :( But when i was driving in Europe i noticed it a lot more often. Good people there!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!