Jump to content

Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?




Photo

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic * * * * * 1 votes

#1 Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 55,150 posts
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 25 May 2012 - 00:57

A judge in Florida ruled on Tuesday that flashing one's headlights to warn other drivers of speed traps set by police is protected by the First Amendment.

Ryan Kintner of Lake Mary, Fla. was pulled over and cited by a police officer in an unmarked car for doing just that. Kintner was at home when he saw a deputy park along a street and being using his radar gun. He got in his car, drove a little ways away and parked his vehicle so he could flash his lights at oncoming traffic to warn them.

He was stopped shortly after doing so and fined $166 for "improper flashing of lights."

Kintner, however, was not going down without a fight. :) He took his case to court, suing the Seminole County Sheriff's Office, with Attorney J. Marcus Jones arguing that "You're completely in your rights to flash your headlights. Flashing your headlights is expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. By issuing a citation, monetary fine for that conduct you've breached the First Amendment rights."

The judge agreed that the officer misapplied a law meant to ban motorists from flashing after-market emergency lights and ruled that the law does not apply to people using headlights as a form of communication. Thus, the court decided, citing Kintner was, in fact, a violation of one of his Constitutionally-protected rights.

Jones has filed a similar suit in Tallahassee aimed at the entire Florida Highway Patrol, which has agreed to stop citing drivers for flashing their headlights until litigation is complete.

"This stuff is fun," said Jones after Tuesday's hearing.

source


#2 sava700

sava700

    Resident Elite

  • 1,150 posts

Posted 25 May 2012 - 01:03

use off road lights..they don't flash up the tail lights in the process which is what gives most people away in the first place.

#3 cooky560

cooky560

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 3,158 posts
  • Location: Around
  • OS: Mac OSX
  • Phone: iPhone 5

Posted 25 May 2012 - 09:02

You are missing the point I think sava

#4 +Daedroth

Daedroth

    Resident Fanatic

  • 958 posts
  • Location: UK

Posted 25 May 2012 - 09:14

Imagine if that had been upheld. Drivers often warn other drivers of not only speed traps, but upcoming queues/problems/accidents (mainly lorry drivers). That's be a lot of people breaking the first amendment!

#5 Dashel

Dashel

    Disgustipator

  • 7,195 posts
  • Location: USA

Posted 25 May 2012 - 15:27

I've run into this myself, I'm glad to hear he not only pushed back but one. Just another slimy way local city cops are looking to screw people over.

Frankly, it seems that new drivers today don't understand their civic duty to other drivers when they see speed traps like that.

#6 OP Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 55,150 posts
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 25 May 2012 - 15:34

We should have vehicle signs that we can light up, that read: COP AHEAD :laugh:

#7 melansonbx93

melansonbx93

    Neowinian

  • 3 posts

Posted 03 July 2012 - 23:44

I can't believe someone was fined for this. I was driving my truck into town the other day to pickup a friend and I didn't have an inspection, but I saw someone flashing their headlights and was wondering what was going on... I get down the road to find a road check, luckily I drove slow and was able to turn into a subdivision right before it and turn around. People flash their lights around here to warn of road checks, speed radaring, accidents or maybe even a reckless or drunk driver. As soon as you see someone flash their lights, it's to signal you to proceed with caution and pay close attention to detail - It pretty much wakes you up.

#8 Javik

Javik

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,433 posts

Posted 03 July 2012 - 23:47

If the argument that speed traps is to get people to slow down were to hold any water, the police wouldn't give a damn what the actual reason was for the slowing down, as long as the driver actually slowed down. The fact that the people giving the warnings are being censored tells us one thing: That the speed traps have nothing to do with safer driving and everything to do with making more money from fines.

#9 Dan~

Dan~

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 2,556 posts
  • Location: Southampton, UK

Posted 04 July 2012 - 08:57

Well he could argue that he was warning drivers of a hazard ahead, slow down. After all a speed gun/camera etc is a hazard as people usually brake, even though they don't need to, just a natural reaction.

Could of even tried "I forgot where my window washer lever was" :p

but yer, he knew what he was doing and got raped for trying to help others, always happens to the nice people

#10 Kami-

Kami-

    ♫ d(-_-)b ♫

  • 3,640 posts
  • Location: SandBox

Posted 04 July 2012 - 11:44

but yer, he knew what he was doing and got raped for trying to help others, always happens to the nice people


Did you actually read the whole thing?

#11 Kirkburn

Kirkburn

    Mmm, delicious sanity.

  • 6,696 posts
  • Location: Bristol, UK

Posted 04 July 2012 - 12:40

'Civic duty', 'the nice people' ... seriously? I know this is hardly a new issue (nor am I going to end the discussion), but think of it this way: he was acting as a lookout for people engaged in illegal acts. That doesn't sound like civic duty to me.

#12 Rohdekill

Rohdekill

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 2,996 posts
  • Location: Earth

Posted 04 July 2012 - 12:50

I've run into this myself, I'm glad to hear he not only pushed back but one. Just another slimy way local city cops are looking to screw people over.

Frankly, it seems that new drivers today don't understand their civic duty to other drivers when they see speed traps like that.


Civic duty? lol.
I personally never warn oncoming drivers on speed traps. You know the speed limit. You know the punishment if caught. You made the choice.

#13 +Majesticmerc

Majesticmerc

    Resident Idealist

  • 5,132 posts
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • OS: Arch Linux / Win 7
  • Phone: HTC One X

Posted 04 July 2012 - 12:52

'Civic duty', 'the nice people' ... seriously? I know this is hardly a new issue (nor am I going to end the discussion), but think of it this way: he was acting as a lookout for people engaged in illegal acts. That doesn't sound like civic duty to me.


How do you know those people were intent on committing illegal acts? I've nearly been caught out before simply because I wasn't watching my speed as it slowly increased over the speed limit. The civic duty here is reminding people to watch their speed and to avoid an accident by driving too fast, and to drive safely (after all, speed cameras are there to ensure that people are driving safely, and not just as a source of money right? Right?). It's not like every person on the road is a lead-footed death trap.

#14 Kirkburn

Kirkburn

    Mmm, delicious sanity.

  • 6,696 posts
  • Location: Bristol, UK

Posted 04 July 2012 - 13:00

How do you know those people were intent on committing illegal acts? I've nearly been caught out before simply because I wasn't watching my speed as it slowly increased over the speed limit. The civic duty here is reminding people to watch their speed and to avoid an accident by driving too fast, and to drive safely (after all, speed cameras are there to ensure that people are driving safely, and not just as a source of money right? Right?). It's not like every person on the road is a lead-footed death trap.

Intent has nothing to do with it. If you're not controlling your speed, that's your problem. (Yes, I drive, and I know it's not easy - but that doesn't really excuse it).

Civic duty would mean doing it all the time, not just when the person has a chance of being caught.He was doing it to save people from being caught by the police officer, not to save them from speeding.

And yes, speed cameras are used to prevent people from speeding. Amazingly, things can have more than one purpose. I don't agree with profit being a good purpose, but I'm not denying it might be a motivation. However, the main reason for having them is to prevent people from doing something dangerous and illegal.

#15 Glassed Silver

Glassed Silver

    ☆♡Neowin's portion of Crazy♡☆

  • 10,729 posts
  • Location: MY CATFORT in Kassel, Germany
  • OS: OS X ML; W7; Elementary; Android 4
  • Phone: iPhone 5 64GB Black (6.0.2)

Posted 04 July 2012 - 13:02

If the argument that speed traps is to get people to slow down were to hold any water, the police wouldn't give a damn what the actual reason was for the slowing down, as long as the driver actually slowed down. The fact that the people giving the warnings are being censored tells us one thing: That the speed traps have nothing to do with safer driving and everything to do with making more money from fines.

Or you know, it's the principle of random sampling.

Glassed Silver:mac



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: florida, first amendment