How do I check if my wireless repeater is working or not ?


Recommended Posts

Tracert ?? Should show up as a link in-between you and the router... just a thought..(not quite 100% sure it would show up but worth a try)

also like suggested go far away from your router.. then switch off the repeater go to the point at which you loose original signal.. then switch the repeater back on-- you should notice the signal come back..

Is their website under maintenance ? Or I'm looking at a wrong url.

Could you please post download link

LOL-- Tracert means traceroute from command prompt..

http://www.mediacoll...traceroute.html

from the command prompt....

tracert www.google.com [/CODE]

You may want to elevate it to administrator ...

Sometimes depending on the repeater model you may see two of your routers listed as being in the route.. to the traced website.

this is a handy tool for testing wireless http://www.metageek....ducts/inssider/. hope this helps

I used this tool and run this ... I get this report

repeatertest.png

I dont understand those data in snapshot. I am using D-Link Router and ASUS reapeter .

Could you please tell if my ASUS Reapeter is working OK ?

I used this tool and run this ... I get this report

repeatertest.png

I dont understand those data in snapshot. I am using D-Link Router and ASUS reapeter .

Could you please tell if my ASUS Reapeter is working OK ?

so from what i understand you are getting a slightly better connection with the Asus repeater.

-70 still a pretty crappy signal -- how far away from devices are you? Across the street?

What do you mean by working? What that you can connect to it? That your connecting to it vs the router? See how its highlighted a bit brighter, that means your connected to it.

Does it cut your speed in half -- then your connected to the repeater ;)

If you want to have better wireless coverage and speed - then run a wire from your router to where you need coverage and use the wireless router/repeater as AcessPoint! You will then get full wireless speed to it, vs half because its wireless connected to your first router. Repeat as many times as you need to provide full wireless coverage for your area with the strength you want.

I am really curious how far away your repeater is if your seeing -70, and where is your actual router? **** my wireless interface is in my metal case of my computer - with NO antenna attached, and is under my very heavy wood oak desk, and I still get better than -84 to routers somewhere down the block from me!

post-14624-0-10596000-1338033802.jpg

See those 2 with better than your 84, they are somewhere in the neighborhood. If inssider is showing you the signal in Red and Orange, etc.. Not a very good signal ;)

edit: Ok I connected my ALFA usb card, its got an antenna on it and on top of my desk. Look at the jump in signal from some wireless network in the neighborhood -- its now at -67 which is better than your repeater signal.. Where are you at in relation to this repeater? What kind of wireless interface are you using - is it built into your laptop? Usb? What

post-14624-0-57676100-1338034658.jpg

^ yup that is correct, tracert is used to show how many users are connected to any site, and what their speeds and IPs are...

You have to watch this if you have not seen it!!

And keep in mind the ones you can not see are because your connection is not as good as theres!!

^ yup that is correct, tracert is used to show how many users are connected to any site, and what their speeds and IPs are...

You have to watch this if you have not seen it!!

And keep in mind the ones you can not see are because your connection is not as good as theres!!

i can sleep soundly at night knowing he is l33t with tracert. i just hope he dosnt discover how to use ping.

tracert isn't going to show you what you want, it only shows you who/how many people is/are connected to google at any particular time. nextgenhacker101 says so.

Actually-- depending on the Repeater.... The repeater will echo the router and show up twice in a trace.... ....Read what I wrote...

The one I have now without the repeater on it shows my router once in the trace... with the repeater on the router shows up twice.....

And Yes I know what you are saying, but when a repeater is used it will show up twice in a trace route... (because in essence it goes through the router twice)

You know the hand off from the repeater back to the router.......

basically what happens--

without a repeater....

Your computer says -- go to google.com- router says router here -- go to google.com

With the repeater

your computer says - go to google.com - repeater says router here- relay to router - go to google.com to router- go to google.com

when it relays that signal it shows up as two router connections

That and in the troubleshooting part of my repeater manual it says

run Tracert to diagnose connection issue to router..It says should show as two of the same connection if working. If it does not show up twice the routers connection then it is not working and to reset it and reprogram it.

But that is the wrong way to troubleshoot wireless. How budman is going about it is the proper way.

You need to see signal strength, not reply times. While it helps somewhat, it doesn't do squat for you. It doesn't tell you if you are covered enough, it doesn't tell you which ap you are connecting to, the only thing it does is tell you ping/response times.

True it may show you you are connected to a repeater, but if you want to know if you are properly saturated a tracert isn't going to give you that information....you need to look deeper.

That is the difference between book smarts and experience. A book isn't going to tell you to do something else when it is wrong.

But that is the wrong way to troubleshoot wireless. How budman is going about it is the proper way.

You need to see signal strength, not reply times. While it helps somewhat, it doesn't do squat for you. It doesn't tell you if you are covered enough, it doesn't tell you which ap you are connecting to, the only thing it does is tell you ping/response times.

True it may show you you are connected to a repeater, but if you want to know if you are properly saturated a tracert isn't going to give you that information....you need to look deeper.

You are telling me the manual is wrong?? He only asked was it working>?

I understand you are talking about signal strength , but this is step one of the troubleshooting guide in my manual for my repeater.

That and it also suggests setting the repeater to a different ip address then re run the tracert . To see if there is a large delay between the handoff times. Quoting the book...

And I was just using google.com as an example-- for this example he should use the IP of his router.. to see if it shows up twice..

"The repeater will echo the router and show up twice in a trace"

Where does it say that?? If you are double natting or actually routing you would see different IP in the hop, but you should not see duplicate of your gateway??

That is what would happen if you had a double nat setup with same IP address on both sides of the nat. But wireless is a bridge and the repeater is not your gateway - its just repeating the wireless connection. You should never actually land on the repeater for it to show up in a hop. The IP address of the repeater would be a different IP than your gateway as well, so why should it show the gateway IP twice?

Please provide source to this manual, what is the make and model number of your device and what mode do you have it in?

If you are seeing your router IP twice in a tracert to google, your not really in wireless repeater or bridge mode or WDS type setup. What is the IP address of your "repeater" ?

So when your network traffic be it wireless or wired transverses a bridge, do you see this as a hop? No -- so why should you be seeing your gateway IP twice?

Really curious to how your setup if this is the case!

Think of it this way -- do you see the IP address your AccessPoint when it is connected to your wired network. Then why should you see your gateway address repeated twice when you go through another bridge that just repeats the wireless signal to another AP?

If you want to know what wireless AP your connected to then you would look in your supplicant and it will show you the MAC address of the wireless radio your associated too. The wireless router/ap/repeater/etc.

Now the gui one that comes with w7 is pretty limited, but you can get that info from cmd line with netsh


netsh>wlan
netsh wlan>show all
Wireless System Information Summary
(Time: 5/27/2012 6:05:55 AM Central Daylight Time)

<snipped>
=======================================================================
============================= SHOW INTERFACES =========================
=======================================================================


There is 1 interface on the system:

	Name				   : Wireless Network Connection
	Description			: DW1501 Wireless-N WLAN Half-Mini Card
	GUID				   : 737d5c79-2b15-4e24-87cf-6d4afff1c9db
	Physical address	   : 38:59:f9:5f:63:c1
	State				  : connected
	SSID				   : snipped
	BSSID				  : 00:13:10:<snipped>
	Network type		   : Infrastructure
	Radio type			 : 802.11g
	Authentication		 : WPA2-Personal
	Cipher				 : CCMP
	Connection mode		: Auto Connect
	Channel				: 1
	Receive rate (Mbps)	: 54
	Transmit rate (Mbps)   : 54
	Signal				 : 96%
	Profile				: snipped

	Hosted network status  : Not available

See the BSSID, that is the MAC of the radio your connected too. Now I have snipped the SSID and part of the mac, because there are databases created from wardriving info that you can look up that stuff, and could point you pretty much right to my house. So its a privacy thing.

"The repeater will echo the router and show up twice in a trace"

Where does it say that?? If you are double natting or actually routing you would see different IP in the hop, but you should not see duplicate of your gateway??

That is what would happen if you had a double nat setup with same IP address on both sides of the nat. But wireless is a bridge and the repeater is not your gateway - its just repeating the wireless connection. You should never actually land on the repeater for it to show up in a hop. The IP address of the repeater would be a different IP than your gateway as well, so why should it show the gateway IP twice?

Please provide source to this manual, what is the make and model number of your device and what mode do you have it in?

If you are seeing your router IP twice in a tracert to google, your not really in wireless repeater or bridge mode or WDS type setup. What is the IP address of your "repeater" ?

So when your network traffic be it wireless or wired transverses a bridge, do you see this as a hop? No -- so why should you be seeing your gateway IP twice?

Really curious to how your setup if this is the case!

Think of it this way -- do you see the IP address your AccessPoint when it is connected to your wired network. Then why should you see your gateway address repeated twice when you go through another bridge that just repeats the wireless signal to another AP?

If you want to know what wireless AP your connected to then you would look in your supplicant and it will show you the MAC address of the wireless radio your associated too. The wireless router/ap/repeater/etc.

Now the gui one that comes with w7 is pretty limited, but you can get that info from cmd line with netsh



netsh>wlan
netsh wlan>show all
Wireless System Information Summary
(Time: 5/27/2012 6:05:55 AM Central Daylight Time)

<snipped>
=======================================================================
============================= SHOW INTERFACES =========================
=======================================================================


There is 1 interface on the system:

Name : Wireless Network Connection
Description : DW1501 Wireless-N WLAN Half-Mini Card
GUID : 737d5c79-2b15-4e24-87cf-6d4afff1c9db
Physical address : 38:59:f9:5f:63:c1
State : connected
SSID : snipped
BSSID : 00:13:10:<snipped>
Network type : Infrastructure
Radio type : 802.11g
Authentication : WPA2-Personal
Cipher : CCMP
Connection mode : Auto Connect
Channel : 1
Receive rate (Mbps) : 54
Transmit rate (Mbps) : 54
Signal : 96%
Profile : snipped

Hosted network status : Not available


See the BSSID, that is the MAC of the radio your connected too. Now I have snipped the SSID and part of the mac, because there are databases created from wardriving info that you can look up that stuff, and could point you pretty much right to my house. So its a privacy thing.

Sorry that was a mistype--

It says the router will "echo in repeater mode" in a tracert and shows up as a connection (hop) between the router to see if it is working.. and a I use Lynksis router in repeater mode. (two of the same model)

There is a setting to enable specify IP address as well. To make for easier diagnosis.

I am guessing that by ECHO they mean respond back in a tracert. And that it is counting it and the router.

Which in my case is two routers but I figured with a simple repeater it would show up as "hop" as well.

What I meant is that there should be two hops between you and the router.

Sorry for the confusion it says that it does show up in a tracert and says to use the ttl's to see if connection issues exist.

It also has troubleshooter that suggests things to try with the repeater , such as changing its radio from 54,000 to 72000 or 150,000 (Wireless Bands Is the settings in the router to just use N or A-B) and or the changing channel to other channels to reduce interference.

When I run Tracert there is two three hops between me and my internet...

Me to "Router in Repeater mode"

The router that is being repeated

The Cable Modem

(next hop is the internet)

The manual is not exactly the best at explaining but for me -- With my other router setup in repeater mode it shows up as hop . (the repeater itself with a different Mac address)

A cable "modem" does not show up in a traceroute - its not a modem if it does, its a GATEWAY (modem/router combo)

What is the model of the devices you are using?

From what you have stated, I would assume your doing at min a double nat, if not a triple?

Why would anyone want 3 hops before they even hit the ISP router? Here is trace to google, there is router in there the 192.168.1.253 address and even if wireless which is at 192.168.1.252 (you would never see this as a hop) Unless you were routing the traffic -- why would you want to run through 3 different segments before you even hit your isp? Even if no nat involved until the last router before you isp.

Can you please provide the make and model numbers of all of your devices so I can read the manual and see how you have it configured - I would guess from 3 hops you don't have it configured in a optimal fashion. If your cable "modem" is a hop - why do you even have a router? Why don't you just use the "modem" that is the border between your private network and the public internet to control access? When you say lynksis -- do you mean linksys?

Here is a trace from a wireless device through my AP, My router and my cable modem!

traceroute www.google.com

traceroute to www.google.com (74.125.225.209), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets

1 pfsense.local.lan (192.168.1.253) 2.159 ms 2.495 ms 2.453 ms

2 c-24-13-xx-xx.hsd1.il.comcast.net (24.13.xx.xx) 11.791 ms 18.604 ms 32.163 ms

3 te-1-2-ur08.mtprospect.il.chicago.comcast.net (68.85.131.153) 19.468 ms 19.426 ms 20.286 ms

<snipped>

So I snipped out the rest of that, and snipped the last couple of octets off my ISP gateway, no reason to give you the network I am on. You can see pfsense is my router. What you don't see is the SB6120 Motorola cable modem that is between my router and the isp. Nor do you see the AP that has an ip of 192.168.1.252 on my network that the traffic flows through as well. Even if I had a reason to repeat that wireless signal - because I could not run a wire to the AP to extend my wireless network. For example like this

post-14624-0-80046000-1338314022_thumb.j

You would not see those devices in the trace, even if there were multiples of them chained out.. Just your wireless speed would be cut in half for every repeat.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • They have lots of info on me, I have a facebook account and have done so for years, it was the thing to have then. My phone number is not on it. I don't have the Facebook app on my phone these days, just the messenger part, and only for a couple of people to contact me, most will text me via SMS or phone. I agree, Meta, like others, even without an account will know something about me. Just have to try and keep some things private Also, never saw the need for Whatsapp, people used to ask for me to join it, but as I said to them, I have SMS and a phone, use that, or email
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!