Recommended Posts

Is it possible to access SSH/FTP through port tunnelling or proxy or something?

I'm not exactly sure what i'm asking for but the problem i'm facing is: i want to access my home NAS (linux) box from work. However my works proxy is pretty much locked down i can't ftp, ssh, ftps.. everything is pretty much blocked.

I can WebDAV into the box, as expected as this is port 80.. so is there any way i can access ssh/ftp over port 80? Obviously i can't listen on port 80 since it's already in use but i can change the ports to anything else not in use.

WebDAV would be suitable but since it treats all files like http requests it's hard to do web development from the box, if there is an error in the PHP file. then opening the file will just display the error, rather than the code. It's the same with .htaccess files and such, they are blocked from direct http access.

I'm not sure if either solution would be possible:

- Make WebDAV work like FTP... may be some apache configs or something?

- Port tunnelling or some sort of service to allow access to FTP/SSH over a proxy?

I don't need a lecture about trying to go outside of company networks, policies or going around firewalls. I manage the whole network it is the external firewalls whats blocking but the guys who manage it are a nightmare ignore emails and never get the job done. I've been complaining about FTP access for years as we struggle to update our own website, they say it should work, logs say otherwise.. They haven't given me full access to the proxy firewall, even though they should, i've given up trying and want to see if there is another method?

Who said anything about the NAS running on 443? Have you router forward 443 to 22. Use a different box to tunnel into your network, then access what you want over that tunnel. Use openvpn to your router/otherbox on 443, then connect to whatever you want, etc.

What router do you have? if you have one that runs Tomato or DDWRT you could run the SSH server on port 443 then forward ports to services running on your nas.

I do this as a quick and secure way of connecting to my home server.

I use openvpn over 443 to my router, then I can access anything I want on my local network. What is nice about openvpn is you can even bounce it off a proxy if all they do is allow your proxy to access the internet.

Sure you can use ssh as your poor mans vpn, tunnel through it to what you want. If all you need is access to a couple of devices/services on the remote network that works fine. But its much easier when you have access to everything on the remote network without having to create specific tunnels through the ssh connection.

As to your ftp not working -- are you using active or passive? If your running through a double nat - ie your end and the remote end. And there is no helpers on the firewalls to change ports. Server not setup correctly to hand out its public ip, etc. etc. Then yeah you can have issues with that.

Can you not even get the control connection on port 21? Are you trying to use ftps? What ports?

Here is a good writeup on how active and passive ftp work, once you understand how the connections are made in each method it can help you figure out what is not setup correctly on your ftp server to allow access, etc.

http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html

I have a rubbish Virgin Media SuperHub which is a NETGEAR VMDG480 so i'm not sure what capabilities it will have i'll check when i return home.

VPN will require some reading i'm not 100% on it never done it before however my NAS does have a VPN server capabilities no sure if that would help?

FTP i've tried passive and active;

Blocked logs just show this:

May 30 13:59:20  reject_Trusted/Internet LAN 1? 10.83.112.36 59277 81.100.2X7.XX 21 TCP[/CODE]

Also does this for 22.

Where did you pull that log entry from? Your locations firewall/proxy?

Yeah never going to work if you can not connect to the control port. What nas do you have? If it has vpn, I would guess some proprietary vpn -- maybe its openvpn?

Would have to check the manual for your router - but if some modified device for use with a specific isp, they might have removed the bells and whistle type features. Not sure I would call forwarding port X to private ip port Y a bell or even a whistle. But yeah that would make it a bit more difficult if not there, would have to then change the actual listen port on the device running the service -- which might not be an option if some appliance type nas? Do you have any other PC or something you could use to run either SSH or openvpn? So for example you can pickup like a pogo for like $25.

Where did you pull that log entry from? Your locations firewall/proxy?

Yeah never going to work if you can not connect to the control port. What nas do you have? If it has vpn, I would guess some proprietary vpn -- maybe its openvpn?

Would have to check the manual for your router - but if some modified device for use with a specific isp, they might have removed the bells and whistle type features. Not sure I would call forwarding port X to private ip port Y a bell or even a whistle. But yeah that would make it a bit more difficult if not there, would have to then change the actual listen port on the device running the service -- which might not be an option if some appliance type nas? Do you have any other PC or something you could use to run either SSH or openvpn? So for example you can pickup like a pogo for like $25.

That log is from my works cachepilot/proxy from when i try to connect to anything except http/https on my works network.

I have a QNAP TS219P II and it has OpenVPN - the information on that: http://docs.qnap.com/nas/en/vpn_service.htm?zoom_highlightsub=vpn

My router definitely has some sort of port forwarding features.

Well I would hope it have port forwarding ;) But can you forward port X to port Y is the question, this is not an uncommon feature - really should be standard type setup.. But you never know with these isp modified devices.

If your nas supports - the question is can you get it to listen on tcp port X vs the standard udp openvpn 1194 port.

If you can get it to listen and use tcp on 443 then you should be be good to go with openvpn setup.

I'm not sure here is the admin screens:

http://screenshots.portforward.com/routers/Virgin_Media/CG3101D/Port_Forwarding.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Het12XEXyVM/Tw24KPP0bBI/AAAAAAAAAcA/TCwzuTkPdR0/s1600/001%252520%25282%2529%255B3%255D.png

When i try to set OpenVPN Server port to TCP 443 on the NAS it says the same 'This port is reserved for other services' - That's so annoying considering i've disabled everything it uses.

Are you sure you're forwarding your ports properly? SImply tried rebooting or updating the firmware?

Next to that, I'm not sure whether you've got a consumer or business membership, but I suspect Virgin might be using the port for some sort of remote management of the router. Have you to just use tcp port 80 or tried using another router? I'd like to suggest using a router that can be flashed with DD-WRT or OpenWRT or a professional router with Cisco IOS (not the SOHO/SMB crap), because it offers advanced options and lets you mimic most requirements or special settings required by an ISP (not sure how closed down Virgin is).

Another 'dirty' solution would be using a reverse NAT based rule that would publish your data to another external (3rd party) service that offers access through the webbrowser in case you really need it, but securitywise this is generally not a good idea.

Another 'dirty' solution would be just to open a port on the router (not forwarding it to anything, if your router supports it), then connect to your router on that source port and sort of re-direct the traffic to another destination port (with an SSH client or some sort of client which would support it ofc).

Yes forwarding ports correctly the NAS does it automatically as soon as i change port on a service it automatically updates on the router i've confirmed it works. rebooted yes firmware is latest.

i think VM use 8080 for remote.

I've tried connecting to VPN on some known unused ports but no joy at all, i need 443 but the stupid NAS won't take it.

I'm going to check on their support forums to see if there is a way to free it or change from the command line.

Other than that i think my only option is tunneling on port 80 or 443? to 22 or whatever on my NAS. but still struggling with this?

The SuperHub port forwarding is hopeless and does not support what you want for mapping external port to different internal port better to just get your own router really.

For tunnelling you could use FreeProxy.

http://www.handcraftedsoftware.org/index.php?page=download&op=getFile&id=2&title=FreeProxy-Internet-Suite

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!