Recommended Posts

Is it possible to access SSH/FTP through port tunnelling or proxy or something?

I'm not exactly sure what i'm asking for but the problem i'm facing is: i want to access my home NAS (linux) box from work. However my works proxy is pretty much locked down i can't ftp, ssh, ftps.. everything is pretty much blocked.

I can WebDAV into the box, as expected as this is port 80.. so is there any way i can access ssh/ftp over port 80? Obviously i can't listen on port 80 since it's already in use but i can change the ports to anything else not in use.

WebDAV would be suitable but since it treats all files like http requests it's hard to do web development from the box, if there is an error in the PHP file. then opening the file will just display the error, rather than the code. It's the same with .htaccess files and such, they are blocked from direct http access.

I'm not sure if either solution would be possible:

- Make WebDAV work like FTP... may be some apache configs or something?

- Port tunnelling or some sort of service to allow access to FTP/SSH over a proxy?

I don't need a lecture about trying to go outside of company networks, policies or going around firewalls. I manage the whole network it is the external firewalls whats blocking but the guys who manage it are a nightmare ignore emails and never get the job done. I've been complaining about FTP access for years as we struggle to update our own website, they say it should work, logs say otherwise.. They haven't given me full access to the proxy firewall, even though they should, i've given up trying and want to see if there is another method?

Who said anything about the NAS running on 443? Have you router forward 443 to 22. Use a different box to tunnel into your network, then access what you want over that tunnel. Use openvpn to your router/otherbox on 443, then connect to whatever you want, etc.

What router do you have? if you have one that runs Tomato or DDWRT you could run the SSH server on port 443 then forward ports to services running on your nas.

I do this as a quick and secure way of connecting to my home server.

I use openvpn over 443 to my router, then I can access anything I want on my local network. What is nice about openvpn is you can even bounce it off a proxy if all they do is allow your proxy to access the internet.

Sure you can use ssh as your poor mans vpn, tunnel through it to what you want. If all you need is access to a couple of devices/services on the remote network that works fine. But its much easier when you have access to everything on the remote network without having to create specific tunnels through the ssh connection.

As to your ftp not working -- are you using active or passive? If your running through a double nat - ie your end and the remote end. And there is no helpers on the firewalls to change ports. Server not setup correctly to hand out its public ip, etc. etc. Then yeah you can have issues with that.

Can you not even get the control connection on port 21? Are you trying to use ftps? What ports?

Here is a good writeup on how active and passive ftp work, once you understand how the connections are made in each method it can help you figure out what is not setup correctly on your ftp server to allow access, etc.

http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html

I have a rubbish Virgin Media SuperHub which is a NETGEAR VMDG480 so i'm not sure what capabilities it will have i'll check when i return home.

VPN will require some reading i'm not 100% on it never done it before however my NAS does have a VPN server capabilities no sure if that would help?

FTP i've tried passive and active;

Blocked logs just show this:

May 30 13:59:20  reject_Trusted/Internet LAN 1? 10.83.112.36 59277 81.100.2X7.XX 21 TCP[/CODE]

Also does this for 22.

Where did you pull that log entry from? Your locations firewall/proxy?

Yeah never going to work if you can not connect to the control port. What nas do you have? If it has vpn, I would guess some proprietary vpn -- maybe its openvpn?

Would have to check the manual for your router - but if some modified device for use with a specific isp, they might have removed the bells and whistle type features. Not sure I would call forwarding port X to private ip port Y a bell or even a whistle. But yeah that would make it a bit more difficult if not there, would have to then change the actual listen port on the device running the service -- which might not be an option if some appliance type nas? Do you have any other PC or something you could use to run either SSH or openvpn? So for example you can pickup like a pogo for like $25.

Where did you pull that log entry from? Your locations firewall/proxy?

Yeah never going to work if you can not connect to the control port. What nas do you have? If it has vpn, I would guess some proprietary vpn -- maybe its openvpn?

Would have to check the manual for your router - but if some modified device for use with a specific isp, they might have removed the bells and whistle type features. Not sure I would call forwarding port X to private ip port Y a bell or even a whistle. But yeah that would make it a bit more difficult if not there, would have to then change the actual listen port on the device running the service -- which might not be an option if some appliance type nas? Do you have any other PC or something you could use to run either SSH or openvpn? So for example you can pickup like a pogo for like $25.

That log is from my works cachepilot/proxy from when i try to connect to anything except http/https on my works network.

I have a QNAP TS219P II and it has OpenVPN - the information on that: http://docs.qnap.com/nas/en/vpn_service.htm?zoom_highlightsub=vpn

My router definitely has some sort of port forwarding features.

Well I would hope it have port forwarding ;) But can you forward port X to port Y is the question, this is not an uncommon feature - really should be standard type setup.. But you never know with these isp modified devices.

If your nas supports - the question is can you get it to listen on tcp port X vs the standard udp openvpn 1194 port.

If you can get it to listen and use tcp on 443 then you should be be good to go with openvpn setup.

I'm not sure here is the admin screens:

http://screenshots.portforward.com/routers/Virgin_Media/CG3101D/Port_Forwarding.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Het12XEXyVM/Tw24KPP0bBI/AAAAAAAAAcA/TCwzuTkPdR0/s1600/001%252520%25282%2529%255B3%255D.png

When i try to set OpenVPN Server port to TCP 443 on the NAS it says the same 'This port is reserved for other services' - That's so annoying considering i've disabled everything it uses.

Are you sure you're forwarding your ports properly? SImply tried rebooting or updating the firmware?

Next to that, I'm not sure whether you've got a consumer or business membership, but I suspect Virgin might be using the port for some sort of remote management of the router. Have you to just use tcp port 80 or tried using another router? I'd like to suggest using a router that can be flashed with DD-WRT or OpenWRT or a professional router with Cisco IOS (not the SOHO/SMB crap), because it offers advanced options and lets you mimic most requirements or special settings required by an ISP (not sure how closed down Virgin is).

Another 'dirty' solution would be using a reverse NAT based rule that would publish your data to another external (3rd party) service that offers access through the webbrowser in case you really need it, but securitywise this is generally not a good idea.

Another 'dirty' solution would be just to open a port on the router (not forwarding it to anything, if your router supports it), then connect to your router on that source port and sort of re-direct the traffic to another destination port (with an SSH client or some sort of client which would support it ofc).

Yes forwarding ports correctly the NAS does it automatically as soon as i change port on a service it automatically updates on the router i've confirmed it works. rebooted yes firmware is latest.

i think VM use 8080 for remote.

I've tried connecting to VPN on some known unused ports but no joy at all, i need 443 but the stupid NAS won't take it.

I'm going to check on their support forums to see if there is a way to free it or change from the command line.

Other than that i think my only option is tunneling on port 80 or 443? to 22 or whatever on my NAS. but still struggling with this?

The SuperHub port forwarding is hopeless and does not support what you want for mapping external port to different internal port better to just get your own router really.

For tunnelling you could use FreeProxy.

http://www.handcraftedsoftware.org/index.php?page=download&op=getFile&id=2&title=FreeProxy-Internet-Suite

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I a;ways do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions a concept before defining it, e.g., relays.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!