• 0

C# Calculating textbox values?


Question

Hi,

I have an application with 20 textboxes, i need to do the calculations for example ((TextBox12 * TextBox1 * TextBox7) / 2) and display the result on label when clicking a button.

Ive usually done these like this:


private void lBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
double L, L2;
if (double.TryParse(kTb1.Text, out L) && double.TryParse(kTb2.Text, out L2))
lBl4.Text = String.Format("{0:f1}", (L2 * L));
else
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
}
[/CODE]

I was wondering if there is better way to do this so that I don't have to add all 20 textboxes into this with && double.TryParse?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1083591-c-calculating-textbox-values/
Share on other sites

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You could add the text boxes into an array, and then iterate over the array...


private void lBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
TextBox[] textboxes = {
kTb1,
kTb2,
kTb3,
...
kTb20
};

double temp = 0D, total = 0D;
bool isError = false;
foreach (TextBox tb in textboxes)
{
if (!double.TryParse(tb.Text, out temp))
{
isError = true;
break;
}

total *= temp
}

if (isError)
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
else
lBl4.Text = String.Format("{0:f1}", total);
}
[/CODE]

To generate the array, you could create it in the form's constructor (or OnLoad event handler), and store it as a class variable...

[CODE]
TextBox[] m_textboxes;

protected void Form1_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
TextBox[] m_textboxes = {
kTb1,
kTb2,
kTb3,
...
kTb20
};
}
[/CODE]

If the only text boxes on the form are the ones you'll be using in the calculation, you could also use the Controls property to get the list of child text boxes :)

  • 0

I'd put the textboxes into a panel, iterate the panels controls where the type is a textbox, load the value into an object then use the object to output your requirements.

Agreed that this is the best way to go.

  • 0

An application with 20 textboxes sounds like a pain in the ass to begin with. That said, you can at least factor out repetitive code inside methods, for instance you could create an extension method for textboxes to get their value as a double:


public static double getValue(this TextBox txtBox) {
return double.Parse(txtBox.Text;)
}
[/CODE]

So your code can look like:

[CODE]
try {
lbl4.Text = string.Format("{0:f0}", txt1.getValue() * txt2.getValue() / 3);
}
catch (Exception) {
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
}
[/CODE]

Btw double.Parse with a try-catch (rather than TryParse) is probably the best approach here, it's not like the cost of throwing an exception in this case was of any significance and it leads to cleaner code.

  • 0

An application with 20 textboxes sound like a pain in the ass to begin with. That said, you can at least factor out repetitive code inside methods, for instance you could create an extension method for textboxes to get their value as a double:


<snip>
[/CODE]

Btw double.Parse with a try-catch (rather than TryParse) is probably the best approach here, it's not like the cost of throwing an exception in this case was of any significance and it leads to cleaner code.

How does what you did eliminate repetitive code versus simply using a loop? Using an extension method seems a bit overkill.

  • 0

How does what you did eliminate repetitive code versus simply using a loop? Using an extension method seems a bit overkill.

Assuming he's doing some operation that involves getting the values of all textboxes indistinctly (like a sum or an average), a loop is the obvious solution, but from his code example I gathered he wants to do operations involving specific textboxes and is wondering how to avoid having to write the double.TryParse boilerplate every time. Maybe I just misinterpreted though, anyway the loop solution was already given by others here.
  • 0

Assuming he's doing some operation that involves getting the values of all textboxes indistinctly (like a sum or an average), a loop is the obvious solution, but from his code example I gathered he wants to do operations involving specific textboxes and is wondering how to avoid having to write the double.TryParse boilerplate every time. Maybe I just misinterpreted though, anyway the loop solution was already given by others here.

Actually yeah I see your point now; the first code snippet in the OP seems to suggest arbitrary calculations while the later code snippets suggest otherwise. Interesting.

  • 0

I wonder if the textboxes are the right way to do this afterall?

This application will have 50 textboxes and user inputs values 1-5. Two buttons, calculate and clear. After the calculations it shows a the results of 8 calculations and also a graph.

I first thought I do it with popup dialog but then decided to use textboxes so that user can check the entered values but it will have alot of textboxes...

Any ideas?

  • 0
I wonder if the textboxes are the right way to do this afterall? This application will have 50 textboxes and user inputs values 1-5. Two buttons, calculate and clear. After the calculations it shows a the results of 8 calculations and also a graph. I first thought I do it with popup dialog but then decided to use textboxes so that user can check the entered values but it will have alot of textboxes... Any ideas?
So the user has 5 values to enter and you want to display the result of 8 calculations. Why do you need 50 different fields for that?

I'm not too familiar with Winforms but if you have a lot of data it's usually better to display it with some kind of list control, perhaps DataGrid or ListView.

  • 0

So the user has 5 values to enter and you want to display the result of 8 calculations. Why do you need 50 different fields for that?

I'm not too familiar with Winforms but if you have a lot of data it's usually better to display it with some kind of list control, perhaps DataGrid or ListView.

I meant user needs to enter value 1-5 for every textbox.

  • 0

Ok so you have 8 different calculations that all require 5 inputs for the user and a field to display the result, if I understand correctly. So you could design a UserControl that has 5 input fields and a result field, and use that 8 times with a different equation passed in as a parameter. The equation could be a five-argument Func where the arguments are the 5 different textbox values. Does that make any sense for you?

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
    • If you have an account with any of Meta's services, you technically have an account with all of their services. You may not use it, but it exists.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!