• 0

C# Calculating textbox values?


Question

Hi,

I have an application with 20 textboxes, i need to do the calculations for example ((TextBox12 * TextBox1 * TextBox7) / 2) and display the result on label when clicking a button.

Ive usually done these like this:


private void lBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
double L, L2;
if (double.TryParse(kTb1.Text, out L) && double.TryParse(kTb2.Text, out L2))
lBl4.Text = String.Format("{0:f1}", (L2 * L));
else
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
}
[/CODE]

I was wondering if there is better way to do this so that I don't have to add all 20 textboxes into this with && double.TryParse?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1083591-c-calculating-textbox-values/
Share on other sites

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You could add the text boxes into an array, and then iterate over the array...


private void lBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
TextBox[] textboxes = {
kTb1,
kTb2,
kTb3,
...
kTb20
};

double temp = 0D, total = 0D;
bool isError = false;
foreach (TextBox tb in textboxes)
{
if (!double.TryParse(tb.Text, out temp))
{
isError = true;
break;
}

total *= temp
}

if (isError)
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
else
lBl4.Text = String.Format("{0:f1}", total);
}
[/CODE]

To generate the array, you could create it in the form's constructor (or OnLoad event handler), and store it as a class variable...

[CODE]
TextBox[] m_textboxes;

protected void Form1_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
TextBox[] m_textboxes = {
kTb1,
kTb2,
kTb3,
...
kTb20
};
}
[/CODE]

If the only text boxes on the form are the ones you'll be using in the calculation, you could also use the Controls property to get the list of child text boxes :)

  • 0

I'd put the textboxes into a panel, iterate the panels controls where the type is a textbox, load the value into an object then use the object to output your requirements.

Agreed that this is the best way to go.

  • 0

An application with 20 textboxes sounds like a pain in the ass to begin with. That said, you can at least factor out repetitive code inside methods, for instance you could create an extension method for textboxes to get their value as a double:


public static double getValue(this TextBox txtBox) {
return double.Parse(txtBox.Text;)
}
[/CODE]

So your code can look like:

[CODE]
try {
lbl4.Text = string.Format("{0:f0}", txt1.getValue() * txt2.getValue() / 3);
}
catch (Exception) {
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
}
[/CODE]

Btw double.Parse with a try-catch (rather than TryParse) is probably the best approach here, it's not like the cost of throwing an exception in this case was of any significance and it leads to cleaner code.

  • 0

An application with 20 textboxes sound like a pain in the ass to begin with. That said, you can at least factor out repetitive code inside methods, for instance you could create an extension method for textboxes to get their value as a double:


<snip>
[/CODE]

Btw double.Parse with a try-catch (rather than TryParse) is probably the best approach here, it's not like the cost of throwing an exception in this case was of any significance and it leads to cleaner code.

How does what you did eliminate repetitive code versus simply using a loop? Using an extension method seems a bit overkill.

  • 0

How does what you did eliminate repetitive code versus simply using a loop? Using an extension method seems a bit overkill.

Assuming he's doing some operation that involves getting the values of all textboxes indistinctly (like a sum or an average), a loop is the obvious solution, but from his code example I gathered he wants to do operations involving specific textboxes and is wondering how to avoid having to write the double.TryParse boilerplate every time. Maybe I just misinterpreted though, anyway the loop solution was already given by others here.
  • 0

Assuming he's doing some operation that involves getting the values of all textboxes indistinctly (like a sum or an average), a loop is the obvious solution, but from his code example I gathered he wants to do operations involving specific textboxes and is wondering how to avoid having to write the double.TryParse boilerplate every time. Maybe I just misinterpreted though, anyway the loop solution was already given by others here.

Actually yeah I see your point now; the first code snippet in the OP seems to suggest arbitrary calculations while the later code snippets suggest otherwise. Interesting.

  • 0

I wonder if the textboxes are the right way to do this afterall?

This application will have 50 textboxes and user inputs values 1-5. Two buttons, calculate and clear. After the calculations it shows a the results of 8 calculations and also a graph.

I first thought I do it with popup dialog but then decided to use textboxes so that user can check the entered values but it will have alot of textboxes...

Any ideas?

  • 0
I wonder if the textboxes are the right way to do this afterall? This application will have 50 textboxes and user inputs values 1-5. Two buttons, calculate and clear. After the calculations it shows a the results of 8 calculations and also a graph. I first thought I do it with popup dialog but then decided to use textboxes so that user can check the entered values but it will have alot of textboxes... Any ideas?
So the user has 5 values to enter and you want to display the result of 8 calculations. Why do you need 50 different fields for that?

I'm not too familiar with Winforms but if you have a lot of data it's usually better to display it with some kind of list control, perhaps DataGrid or ListView.

  • 0

So the user has 5 values to enter and you want to display the result of 8 calculations. Why do you need 50 different fields for that?

I'm not too familiar with Winforms but if you have a lot of data it's usually better to display it with some kind of list control, perhaps DataGrid or ListView.

I meant user needs to enter value 1-5 for every textbox.

  • 0

Ok so you have 8 different calculations that all require 5 inputs for the user and a field to display the result, if I understand correctly. So you could design a UserControl that has 5 input fields and a result field, and use that 8 times with a different equation passed in as a parameter. The equation could be a five-argument Func where the arguments are the 5 different textbox values. Does that make any sense for you?

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!